In a few days, voters is likely to be maneuvering to the polls to throw their ballots for president (and also been the past couple of weeks)… well, type of. Once we may all keep in mind dimly from senior high school, when we vote for president, we don't actually vote the president, but for a slate of electors who cast the true votes for president. The Electoral College may have made feeling in 1789 when it was created included in the U.S. Constitution, however it makes very little feeling today. It is the right time to abolish the Electoral university and let the individuals select the president straight.

Before we get into why i really believe we must jettison the Electoral College, you need to realize why we have the Electoral College originally. As C.G.P. Grey noted in his great pair of explainer videos regarding Electoral university, whenever Electoral College was instituted by the founding dads into the 18th century, the fastest method to send information would be to «write it down on a bit of paper, hand it to a guy on a horse, want him 'godspeed, good sir,' and hope he don't get killed by Indians or perish of dysentery on the way.»

CGP Grey on YouTube

Because of the, not merely is there lots of time built-in to the electoral calendar, nevertheless the Electoral College was created allowing the states (through their representative electors) to react quickly to virtually any last-minute developments. As an example, if a presidential candidate died after Election Day but prior to the electors cast their ballots, the electors can make a decision on the basis of the many up-to-date information and never have to wait for guy regarding the horse to get entirely back to his house state.

But we don't require that type of backup system any longer. And considering that the Electoral university doesn't constantly select the most widely used candidate become president, it is a fairly defective system.

Furthermore, as a result of how the Electoral university apportions votes — one Electoral university vote for every single agent in Congress — bigger states are disadvantaged to the benefit of smaller ones. What this means is your vote is literally well worth less if you reside in a really large state, and worth more if you reside in a small state.

Finally, because most states apportion their electors with a winner-take-all rule, states which are almost certainly going to vote for starters prospect or any other get ignored in the run-up toward election. In accordance with FairVote, following conventions in 2012, the four ticket-topping prospects just visited 11 states, and more than 50 % of those visits were to Ohio, Florida, and Virginia.

Definitely, changing the Constitution to a favorite vote system will be tricky, since we'd need certainly to pass an amendment (unlikely in today's governmental atmosphere). But several states have actually finalized to a workaround called the National Popular Vote bill. When sufficient states have signed onto represent an Electoral university bulk, those states would automatically assign their electors to the prospect whom wins the nationwide popular vote no matter who wins the state. The issue could be resolved, no amendment required.


Until we have that fix — and/or participate in more hands-on electoral reform — we will have to deal with the Electoral College, keeping a detailed attention about it to be sure it fairly and accurately represents the folks.

How to cite this essay: