"Welcome, or No Trespassing (1964)" Movie Review Essay & Film Analysis

Summer. The sun. Camp. "Sight" binoculars slides along the restricted area on the other side of the river: businesslike and responsible comrade Dynin looking for violators. Here, in the field of view appears round tanned ass, skinny boy's back and then a mischievous person "spherical Vovochki". Meet - Kostya Inochkin. Brave, a swimmer, a pioneer, all the guys [bad] example. In general, the boy, who is about to go into hiding and will involve the whole camp in a spontaneous conspiracy ...
Elem Klimov film combines two layers of meaning, and not carefully "poured" layers as colorful fluid in exemplary cocktail and generously mixed. Unpretentious story of childhood friendship, generously a painted fantasies bones, and then launches into a satire on the good, but firmed in the formal system, to raise children, how to piglets: It would be health and weight gain
Perhaps it is this "nameshannost" and provided. film long life, but it also greatly hinders watch it now. Such pictures are somewhat similar to the legendary "old KVN" or jokes about Brezhnev. In the sense of humor that is eternal, and the historical context - is not, and fully experience the history of the salt can be used only if you are lucky enough to see the film on time. If you look through the years dtsat, the classics seem bold sharpness or not that sharp, or not quite so bold. After all, to see a radical critique of the Soviet system in the picture, where a prominent party functionary (Mitrofanov himself) represented almost the epitome of modesty, non-formal and mental approach - this is what a severe form of paranoia have to suffer! A friend Dynin ... And that, in fact, Comrade Dynin? Well, a walking guide, well, a biscuit and a formalist, well, does not feed passionate love for children. But nourish ardent love for work: after all, he has thought out and established, all under the master's look closely, though - without an iron grip, and other educational sadism
The part of the story of the children and all the more difficult, and more attractive.. Inexperience of the director gives still be felt: the film is very, very bumpy. Then we have an inner monologue Inochkin then detached from the events of the hero. The heroic sacrifice of Marat and Company resembling stories about boys Vsevolod Krapivina then some ridiculous jump across the river, awkwardly signifying freedom came. The enchanting, appealing to hysterical laughter fantasies about his grandmother or blood 33rd group, roundnose, "What are you doing here, huh?", Which inevitably begin to listen after the fifth repetition - do not beat if someone behind the scenes ... But children are always children, and Evstigneev always Evstigneev, and though about the children in the Soviet Union removed a lot of great films, and Yevgeny Alexandrovich has a strong role to look at this symbiotic relationship of sincerity and experience very pleasant.
what is all this? In addition, you do not lose anything if this particular example of Soviet classics will pass you side. And yet, on occasion, it is worth a look to enjoy the summer, humor and memories of childhood for an hour to return to the mythical time when the system is kind of like a crushed, but the teachers and the doctors tried to work on the conscience, children's nudity did not cause unhealthy associations, and the motto "one for all" was for the ten-year rule of life.
7 of 10

How to cite this essay: