"Welcome, or No Trespassing (1964)" Movie Review Essay & Film Analysis

On the shoulders of the authors, including filmmakers, whose works give wide publicity, has been steadily falls high degree of responsibility. Many writers and directors about this for some reason forgotten. By creating their own world, the more close to reality, the author projects his merits and demerits of the present, the prevailing world order. The viewer will inevitably compare, compare what he sees on the screen, with its reality. With the means of artistic expression, commenting on the fact that the world's good, and what - bad, the author entices the viewer on its side, it brings up. The author may give one or another caste certain character traits, ridicule or praise a particular pattern of behavior. The author can not take account of who and how it shows, not to think about it, the demand will be the same. He has shown, described - then planned to show and describe. So, what tends to the author, what message it carries the movie audience - from this and not from an artistic point of view, I call in the first place to evaluate any work of art, especially art films
1964 year -. Time resignation of the First Secretary of the Party with Nikita Khrushchev. Before leaving Nikita, selling of opinion with the censors culture committee has time to approve a thesis novice director Elem Klimov's "Welcome, or No Trespassing". They say that even Khrushchev was elated. Aware of the "exploits" of Nikita Khrushchev in the post of Secretary General, in his mental faculties at the time of doubt, but it is unlikely he would have missed the picture, whether it is empty and unequivocal anti-Soviet grandstanding, the more happy. Only to supporters of a different, opposing points of view on the film, I would not recommend to side. "Welcome, or Trespassing" - certainly not a model of Soviet propaganda. However, unprincipled cute, solar fiction picture also will not name
«Soviet power created you such a haven, you are only required to discipline!" -. Said from the screen villain, the head of the children's summer camp, a protege of the same power, Dynin friend. It is against the orders of those in power Dynin and his informant (in management of labor collective of all good) in the movie are fighting all the main characters, including the main violator of discipline, the protagonist Kostya Inochkin.
Dynin focuses the forces on the cultural program and development of children and on the discipline and the strict observance of the rules. Not for the health and comfort of wards Dynin fights, but for the fact that they gained weight. Motivation Dynin not limited ambition and craving for order, scene by scene suggest the viewer thinking about cowardice brilliantly played Evstigneev director. By the day of the parent and the arrival of the top party leaders - companion Mitrofanov - Dynin throws all the forces on the organization of the event. By several episodes of the authors emphasize - Dynin in whatever was willing to please Mitrofanov, and even curry favor, to express themselves. Not children and colleagues for him to have a dominant value, and the high-ranking guest. "It's your niece as queen of the fields!" - happily hints Dynin Mitrofanov. Not pleased, Dynin remains in absolute solitude, throwing the children and leaves the camp.
second known adage, such as Dynin gently trail stretches embrace, calling in podotvetstvennye institutions do everything in training manual, but in fact it turns out that their ancestral lands rigid and stupid orders that no one liked. The final scene - the apotheosis of the collision idiotic nomenclature and healthy, free society that ignores the supervisors, demolishing the fence and begins to swim in the "wrong" place. Internal protest ends anarchy, the complete surrender of the supporters of discipline. Khrushchev, for sure, smiled that main - companion Mitrofanov - was a man, and together with all ran to the pond, in advance, of course, giving the go-ahead
If Klimov was far from ideological statements and concentrating only on morality, the ending would be. other, and the story would have been something else in addition to the conflict with the ideological enemy. Attitude towards the unfortunate Dynin formed gradually, the parents do not know anything, and nothing it does not accuses, and the audience about it for a long time to understand everything. While it is noteworthy that Dynin something by and large nothing sverhosuditelnogo does and does not say. Wanted to please his superiors - who does not happen. However, the authors do not think so, smearing Head of gigantic motion picture, go beyond. Judge for yourself, you will come to the children's camp, there are scheduled events scheduled program you for no reason at all spit on the camp commander and leads children to swim. Disrespectful to people unfamiliar to you, right? The authors make it clear on whose side they are, and how much they hate dyninopodobnye.
How could the Soviet intellectuals struggled with the party nomenclature, sometimes exposing the latest in the most unfavorable light. We do it gently and casually, sometimes strongly masking their intentions. To claim that "Welcome, or No unauthorized entry vosproschen" created with only one purpose, or that the film is useless, there are no grounds. Still think this picture makes on very specific things, and the words of a song can not erase.
P.s. It is worth paying attention to the original poster of the film.
6 of 10

How to cite this essay: