"The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring" Movie Review Essay & Film Analysis

! - You shall not pass
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring
This kind-hearted, noisy, talkative, little creatures that live in small houses or holes and dress up as a gang of Robin Hood, of course, on a smaller scale. They eat seven or eight times a day, like a nap, have never been away from home and have a glowing, eyes wide. They are like children who have grown up and grown old, and when it comes to traveling, it takes true heroism, because they are timid by nature, and would prefer to avoid combat. 'Lord of the Rings "- a fairy tale, myth and our imagination. Peter Jackson directed the movie, which has long been thought to be impossible to remove, and not only for technical reasons. Narrative roots incredibly monumental and detailed, and the story lines are deeply connected with the creation of the fantastic continent, a well-known place called - 'Middle-earth'. The author has devoted much of his life developing his universe, its different types of creatures, cultures and languages.
neither perceived Among fentezistov writers with great reverence than Tolkien, which most readers considered the father of modern fantasy. During the last 80-90 years, the number of fantasy works in bookstores grew from small subsection of science fiction to the main category in its own genre. Several dozen have been replaced by the hundreds. Genre 'Fantasy' has gone from cult genre before entering the mainstream. Without a doubt, this would not have happened without the popularity and influence of 'The Hobbit' and 'Lord of the Rings'. Author, almost every published work, admits that he had read and was inspired by Tolkien, and at the time as the 'Lord of the Rings' is not the longest or most complex fantasy series to date, it remains the standard by which all similar works evaluated. When Tolkien began to write 'The Hobbit' in 1930, he did not know that he was, in fact, the legislator of the genre. Tolkien was not the first author who wrote that, in the end, it was called 'Fantasy', but the synthesis of the elements - the mythology, history, covering more than life, the heroism and the fairy tale - was unique
in the late 1990s. 's, in New Zealand, the director Peter Jackson had two projects on the drawing board - a remake of' King Kong 'and ambitious' Lord of the rings'. A series of inconsistencies led to the fact that Jackson drew his attention to the 'Lord of the Rings'. To say that the fantasy films were not very successful at the box office - is to inflate their accomplishments. Much of this was due to the low quality of the product. But, finally, the 2,001th year was marked by a belated recognition of the 'fantasy' as a full-fledged cinematic genre. 'Harry Potter' was one of the most anticipated releases of the unknown and became a hit the next ten years. A little later, came 'The Lord of the Rings', as expected, to a more adult audience. As entertaining film, the first 'Harry Potter' is beautiful, classy and atmospheric film, but it is fair to admit to 'Fellowship of the Ring' Jackson invented the 'Fantasy' in a cinema. This striking film performs what he could not do any other fantasy film transported the audience into a completely different reality, plunged it into her and did not let go for about three hours. 'The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring' brings Middle-earth in our lives. From the very first moment, I was there. Finally, someone figured out how to do it.
'Fellowship of the Ring' begins in the quiet countryside of the Shire, where Bilbo Baggins celebrating his 111th birthday. Among the other characters - the young heir of Bilbo, Frodo and Gandalf the wizard. Gandalf tells Bilbo, it was time to go on a trip. He leaves his home, his favorite possession and magic ring that makes him invisible. But it is not just a magic ring - the only ring forged by the Dark Lord Sauron, capable of corrupting the owner. Servants of Sauron combing Middle-earth, as if it will be returned to their owner, nothing could stop him. The whole world is about to be plunged into war, and the only way to stop the evil - to destroy the ring, throwing him into the fire, where it was forged - in Mordor, on the threshold of the Dark Lord. This unviable task falls on the shoulders of Frodo, the ring carrier. I think the primary source fans were delighted to learn that adaptation is equally true, however, you can imagine. Jackson and his co-writers have done an excellent job of condensing more than five hundred pages of text in the script, which is not felt choppy, uneven or hasty. 'Fellowship of the Ring' is moving smoothly, but in the process excites.
Yes, some things were cut or compressed in the name of the movies, and the role of a single character (Arwen) has been expanded to enhance the romance that is largely absent from work Tolkien. In the first place, 'Lord of the Rings' - is an adventure, and it is constantly successful. No need to read the book to appreciate the film. Background explained briefly in offscreen prologue and narration continues in a simple manner. While the viewer is in a well-thought-out adventure world, and against the backdrop of a mythical battle between good and evil, 'Lord of the Rings' will satisfy. Like all great films of this kind, it is characterized by a spectacular action scenes, interspersed with moments of relaxation and reflection. Along the way there are moments of triumph, sadness and a little bit of philosophical depth. Artwork emphasizes two themes: the importance of brotherhood and the fact that the true strength comes from within. Jackson supernatural task was to give life to the world is completely fictional magic, monsters and heroes. He decided to make films in his native New Zealand, reminiscent of the idealized fairy-tale landscape, but not familiar to most viewers - a bright, varied countryside -. It is the perfect Middle Earth
Middle-earth is populated by a variety of creatures, taken from the world of native European traditions. It may surprise some, the fact that Tolkien was a conservative Catholic. He emphasizes humility and self-sacrifice, on corruption and greed. Immortal elves live in a state of grace in his Garden of Eden, while as mortal men fell, spoiled by power and greed. Sauron is in Mordor, in the fires of hell, and his servant, Saruman, dressed in white, a fallen angel. Ring - a temptation Sauron, offering infinite power. Frodo - a little man, symbolizing a man without self-centeredness or evil, it is the only one who can carry the ring, because he has no ambitions and does not possess any special abilities, which Sauron may draw their own purposes. There are great wizard and warriors who could take the ring, but they were not able to resist trying to use the ring for good or evil, but in the end, they were spoiled, falling under the control of Sauron. Combine your imagination with the imagination of Tolkien, as well as with Frodo, weakly similar to the hero (anyone can be Frodo) and you have the feeling that you are traveling and overcome together with them.
9.5 out of 10

How to cite this essay: