Discuss About The Sustainability Is Defined As The Capability?
Sustainability is defined as the capability of biological systems in order to remain and endure diverse and productive in the long run. The main leading value for the procedure of sustainability is the schedule for maintainable and sustainable development which has different interconnected elements such as ecology, economics, politics, and culture. There are several problems which have challenged people’s reality in the expedition for the accomplishment of developmental sustainability (Hallstedt, 2017, p. 70). Such issues are usually stated by the scholars as wicked issues since they may not be defined fully and they have no concluding solutions where all the interests of stakeholders are optimal. These issues are always difficult and are continually changing necessities, and when one tries to solve a particular aspect in them, it results in rising new several issues making it very complex to get an ideal solution. Wicked issues are thus a set of specific problems which are reflected to be symptoms of other issues. For people to be in a position to come up with resolutions to sustainability issues, it is necessary to change from their conventional tactic of reasoning and develop their mental models. System thinking comes in this situation as models to assist individuals in enhancing significant resolutions to sustainability issues (Rauter, Jonker and Baumgartner, 2017, p. 146).
System thinking is defined as an inter-disciplinary outline which is used to picture the interconnections for viewing different forms of change instead of static snapshots. Though system thinking is an old aspect, it is always referred to as the new method of thinking in order to manage and understand the already existing difficult issue both locally and worldwide. It is a way for development developers to conceptualize as well as act in the direction of the systematic incorporation of economic and socio-environmental proportions of sustainability. The tactic enables establishment for leveraging management difficulties comparative to other ways. It also comprises observing the entire picture as well as comprehending the broader setting while concurrently appreciating relations amongst different levels (Domingues et al., 2017, p. 300).
The importance of this study is based on the fact that no wicked issue which occurs in isolation, but all situations are part of the vast structure of interrelated networks, and thus systems thinking method is significant while creating resolutions for such issues. The reason is that an individual may not understand the behavior of a particular system by examining a few of its sections but rather the entire system (Kauflin, 2017, p. 1). This essay seeks to assess the function of systems thinking in local and global sustainability issues as well as drawing attention to one of the wicked challenges. Personally, I agree with the stated statement that “systems thinking is critical in developing solutions to sustainability challenges,” since the method shows a systematic approach to address problems. A system thinker usually tries to observe beyond the level of microscopic details of an issue to the set of connections in which they are related. This paper analyses the methods in which the tactic addresses the issues through its major phases such as diagnosing the issue so as to view how it may be solved, as well as implementing resolutions with known results. Specific attention will be drawn to the wicked issue of domestic violence while striving to appraise the significance of systems thinking in dealing with the problem.
Focusing on systems thinking, solving the wicked issues of sustainability like domestic violence needs two important components. Form bigger system flexibility for the natural surrounding as well as subsequently reconsidering leadership so as to make it appropriate for dealing with the difficulties of all the combined methods (Hubeau et al., 2017, p.62). Contrasting to the conventional methods of thinking, the systems thinking often put stress on the effects and causes in the systems and the way they are mutually reliant to each other. The tactic may, therefore, assist people to get an in-depth comprehending of the connection in the actual world systems as well as solving the sustainability problems by further comprehending the wicked issue system dynamics. This paper thus concentrates on the use of systems thinking method in order to ensure families are stable and no issues of domestic violence. Sustainable development tries to take along together its 3 elements in balance. Nevertheless, priority is offered to two of its major concepts that are the economy and the culture. The wicked issue of domestic violence lies under the cultural aspect of sustainability.
Looking at domestic violence, system thinking often demands that people should diagnose the issue on the table in its different forms and then see ways in which it can be solved. Looking at domestic violence, very many people in marriages go through domestic violence, and some have a tendency of keeping quiet and not speaking out about this issue because they are afraid of the way other people will perceive them. Focusing on the statistics, they show that women are more likely to be the victims of domestic violence caused by their intimate partners with 85% and men are only 15%. Several women have been held confined with the issue of domestic abuse whether through financial abuse, physical abuse, emotional or psychological abuse or a combination of the three issues (Robinson, 2010, p.311). Evidently, we have witnessed stories concerning the issue from athletes beating their spouses publicly or at home or even celebrities abusing their girlfriends in front of everyone. Research shows that there are many causes of violence and it brings when both partners disagree on an issue, and since women are most likely to be the victims, the husband may end up beating his wife out of anger. Most husbands feel superior, and they use their superiority to abuse their wives even over a little argument. Another cause is when one partner threatens the other one that she will leave him. Men abuse their wives after they are threatened that they will leave and they do this to scare them from leaving and obey whatever they are told (Koenen et al., 2017, p. 309). When the husband has financial issues, he may turn out to be violence in order to protect his ego. Some husbands use their wives as tools to get rid of the stress at their workplace, and after arriving at home, they only cause violence without caring about their children and the wife. Domestic violence is related to many diseases such as depression and hypertension due to stress and lack of peace at home. Additionally, it also affects the victim and particularly children in that family.
The features of systems are that all the sections should be there and that it needs a particular organization as well as purpose. Following the arrangement of how domestic abuse starts, it may begin with the abuser threatening to abuse the victim, but the victim takes it for granted. The abuser may also start showing signs of being jealous at the beginning of the relationship, and he might equate jealousy with a lot of love such that the victim may not suspect anything wrong. The abuser may question the victim the person she has been talking to and accuses her of flirting or become jealous of the time she has spent with others. He might have controlling behavior such as restricting her from visiting her parents. The victim may also be denied a chance to make her decisions and be forced to do something that she is not comfortable doing. When the controlling behavior persists, the abuser takes control of the finances of the victim such that all the money of the victim goes to the abuser. The abuser might start making the victim to isolate from her friends and family such that he blames them whenever something goes wrong in their relationship or marriage. These abusers have a tendency of blaming others due to their own problems or feelings, and mostly they put the blame of their wives. After all these signs, the abuser starts to be violent, and it affects both the wife and the children physically or psychologically (Hearn, 2013, p.169). Thus, peace in the family, and being emotionally fit depends on the relationship at home between couples hence there is need to get ways of solving the problem of domestic violence. It is using systems thinking which we are in a position to analyze and identify the features which result to the lead to the wicked issue. The method also qualifies us to develop a good relationship with our families and recognize how domestic violence is likely to affect us in the whole family. Thus, system thinking is important in establishing resolutions to sustainability problems (Phillips and Vandenbroek, 2014, p.42).
The major focus of system thinking is to help in solving problems and exclusive comprehending of the difficult actual world systems like the explained domestic violence issue. By concentrating on the problem, short term resolutions may be developed easily. Several efforts have been realized to help control the issue of domestic violence. Many organizations in the world have come, and they deal in rescuing victims of domestic violence and offering free houses and counseling processes (Wijethilake, 2017, p. 580). For example, the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence (NCADV) is usually the voice of all survivors and victims of domestic violence. Their mission is that they are the catalyst for a changing society in order to have zero tolerance regarding domestic violence. They do that by affecting the policy of the public, increasing the understanding of the effect of domestic violence as well as offering education and programs which drive the targeted change. The organization educates the society concerning the effects of domestic violence, and they help to reduce its occurrence thus creating peace in families. However, there are efforts of restoring broken marriages due to violence. The capability to see the system of the wicked issue thus results to the leveraging of solutions that in the aspect of domestic violence offers us an idea of the way we may make a better arrangement in order to make sure that there is sustainable control of the issue of domestic violence.
Decision makers in our society rely on the formation of more effective mental representations in order to understand the interconnections of the elements of the system and the way they influence people whether indirectly or directly. The survival of people is reliant on the constant development of system thinking (Allais, Roucoules and Reyes, 2017, p. 221). Nonetheless, it is complex to understand and learn concerning the complicated systems which one is still living in them. System thinking concerns taking one step away from the system and observe it from another perspective from outside. People have no otherwise, but they should rethink about their leadership in order to make it suitable to decide the crucial complexities of cooperative methods to deal with (Fritz, Sch?ggl and Baumgartner, 2017, p.591). Furthermore, improving system resilience improves the entire complexity of the system and therefore results to the necessity of effective understanding, coordination, and good leadership innovation in different organizations of investors. The necessity of working together with organizations increases because all have a common goal of ending domestic violence and it gives the leaders a new challenge.
In conclusion, it is greatly understood that sustainability problems which are faced by people currently are so complex to tackle due to the way they are difficult. Additionally, it is also understood that neither single solutions nor single firms may be optimal to solve these problems. It calls for system thinking in order to advocate for resilience as well as good leadership in striving to tackle the sustainability problems. Policy makers must, therefore, form legislations which may impact positive changes in our society since it is the only easy method to sustainability. Wicked issues are thus a set of specific problems which are reflected to be symptoms of other issues. For people to be in a position to come up with resolutions to sustainability issues, it is necessary to change from their conventional tactic of reasoning and develop their mental models. Additionally, leaders require acting with their wisdom which assimilates true systems moral imagination, understanding and general sensibility. Main funding firms, institutions, and governments must be encouraged to support programs which may establish new accomplished leaders who may comprehend the dynamics of the system and be in a position to deal with cultural issues. Therefore, with the information provided, I support the statement that “systems thinking is critical in developing solutions
Allais R Roucoules L and Reyes T (2017) ‘Governance maturity grid: a transition method for integrating sustainability into companies?’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, pp. 213–226. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.069.
Domingues A R Lozano R Ceulemans K and Ramos T B (2017) ‘Sustainability reporting in public sector organisations: Exploring the relation between the reporting process and organisational change management for sustainability’, Journal of Environmental Management, 192, pp. 292–301. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.01.074.
Fritz M M C Sch?ggl J P and Baumgartner R J (2017) ‘Selected sustainability aspects for supply chain data exchange: Towards a supply chain-wide sustainability assessment’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, pp. 587–607. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.080.
Hallstedt S I (2017) ‘Sustainability criteria and sustainability compliance index for decision support in product development’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, pp. 251–266. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.068.
Hearn J (2013) ‘The sociological significance of domestic violence: Tensions, paradoxes and implications’, Current Sociology, 61(2), pp. 152–170. doi: 10.1177/0011392112456503.
Hubeau M Marchand F Coteur I Mondelaers K Debruyne L and Van Huylenbroeck,G (2017) ‘A new agri-food systems sustainability approach to identify shared transformation pathways towards sustainability’, Ecological Economics, 131, pp. 52–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.08.019.
Kauflin J (2017) The World’s Most Sustainable Companies 2017, Forbes. doi:
Koenen K C Moffitt T E Caspi A Taylor A and Purcell S (2017) ‘Domestic violence is associated with environmental suppression of IQ in young children’, Development and Psychopathology, 15, pp. 297–311. doi: 10.1017.S0954579403000166.
Phillips J and Vandenbroek P (2014) Domestic violence in Australia: an overview of the issues, Parliamentary Library Research Paper. Available at: note (parliamentary library, australia)%22%5Cn
Rauter R Jonker J and Baumgartner R J (2017) ‘Going one’s own way: drivers in developing business models for sustainability’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, pp. 144–154. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.104.
Robinson A (2010) ‘Domestic violence’, in Handbook on Crime, pp. 245–269.
Wijethilake C (2017) ‘Proactive sustainability strategy and corporate sustainability performance: The mediating effect of sustainability control systems’, Journal of Environmental Management, 196, pp. 569–582. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.057.