Sociological Perspectives - there are three major categories in which people might go about and choose how to approach a certain topic. The approaches are known today as sociological perspect Essay



Paper # 1

Victor Grigorov


SOCIOLOGY 101: Sociological Perspectives Paper

When studying sociology, everyone is gonna approach topics in a different method. How we come across the planet from some other standpoint is called social imagination or perception. The sociological imagination, a concept that's been introduced to your globe by C. Wright Mills, fundamentally states that a person lives out a “biography”, and lives it down with a few “historical value “(Ferris 16). Meaning that everybody else reaches live their individual life and individual experience, but simultaneously they subscribe to the changes in history through their experiences which produces the historic series. This is why inside our culture today no two people will need the very same perspective on a certain topic. Nonetheless, you will find three major groups in which people might begin and select how to approach a specific topic. The approaches are known today as sociological views and so are the structural functionalism, conflict theory, and symbolic interactionism views (Ferris 43). These perspectives title diverse ways differing people decide how to analyze a subject, and exactly how they look and feel about society as a whole. Inside paper, i'll compare the three views, and identify major faculties of every one.
Structural functionalists, or simply functionalists, believe society functions in general object which has numerous structures that govern all of its actions and security (Ferris 44). This viewpoint discusses a society in a positive approach and views it as stable, along with of its structures involved in unity (Ferris 44). Within model, peace and social purchase is maintained through the cooperation of an individual as members of the very own culture. You will find three major people who were for the most part the key contributors within the progress for the functionalist viewpoint; they truly are Emile Durkheim, Auguste Comte, and Herbert Spencer (Ferris 44). Each of them learned different structures in society, and contributed to the general part of what structural functionalism is today. Unlike the conflict theory, these sociologists securely thought in a unified structured model. This is exactly why everything was perceived in a “big picture” from a macro sociological standpoint. All things are viewed as having a manifested, or claimed, function as well as a latent, or a concealed function. This overall generic concern with the stability of product and the elimination of disorder in society is just as much a basis because of this kind of concept as much as a flaw (Sociology). It will nothing to explain what drives the patient device to succeed and progress, but only sets the patient in a so called “institution”, and attempts to explain its meager presence. This is where conflict theorists are offered in and try to prove and explain this notion with their standpoint.

Unlike functionalism, the conflict theory bases every thing perhaps not on the unity of societal culture, but regarding constant socio-economic battle that develops between various classes of individuals. In contrast to the functionalist view of stability, conflict sociologists see our society to be in constant fight. Launched by the famous German thinker, Karl Marx, the conflict concept emphasizes its perspective from negative and ever changing nature of our society today (McClelland). Once the guide states, “ Conflict theory proposes that conflict and stress are fundamental facts of social life and suggests that people have disagreements over objectives and values and are also tangled up in struggles over both resources and power” (Ferris 46). Karl Marx proposed that if these tensions in our culture are lacking, then individuals will be more likely to obtain higher goals and training on their own (Ferris 46). This is the reason he strived so much to effect a result of socialism and equality for all individuals. Like functionalism, the conflict theory seen society through a macro sociological degree. As for every person, they're regarded as being shaped by control and power. Social purchase is regarded as being maintained not through cooperation, but through force. And social modification isn't as predictable like in functionalism, it is constantly evolving throughout time (McClelland). The conflict perspective's main concept usually you can find opposing passions between different classes and social inequality exists, therefore there's always conflict of some sort. And even though which explains a big component, and is part of our society today, it willn’t address small and much more subtle dilemmas.

Unlike both views above, symbolic interactionists concentrate the sociological look at the micro level, and on face-to-face interactions between people (Ferris 50). This sort of perspective came to be aided by the teachings of George H. Mead and Max Weber (McClelland). Both of them based their viewpoint from their perspective as humans, as opposed to culture like functionalism. The core view of symbolic interactions usually we as humans within our culture independently influence each others’ everyday social interactions. By studying the small scale interactions, interactionists better understand the more expensive macro sociological photo. When people share those interactions and each other’s understanding of the world, stability is formed and there's no dysfunction. All of these interactions involve some types of symbols, as well as the method they are interpreted determines how individuals function towards each other. Such a thing inside our world can serve as symbolic of interaction providing it relates to one thing beyond it self (Sociology). The same as binary code functions as an easy method of executing computer programs, spoken language serves as a major symbol for us humans. Although this perspective focuses on the micro view of our culture, it could often skip the big photo, which can subsequently cause more structural issue and cause more disorder in our culture.

Worldwide we reside today, individuals often have a tendency to see their individual problems as social dilemmas, and attempt to link their individual experiences using the mechanism of culture. And that's entirely reasonable. Mills thought that this could be the right method for people to gain an understanding and understanding of their personal dilemmas. The sociological perspective assists people link their very own issues with general public issues and their history. To ensure that a person to find out the sources of their problems, they first have to be in a position to comprehend the causes of the issues in the society by which they have been staying in. The sociological viewpoint tries to develop causes for many social trends and provides a structure for comprehending the social globe we inhabit. Having a sociological viewpoint is fundamental as it is very important for people to have a way to relate their individual dilemmas to of culture as a unit.

Works Cited

Ferris, Kerry, and Jill Stein. Actuality an Introduction to Sociology. 2nd ed. New York: W.W. Norton

&, 2010. Printing

McClelland, Kent. «SOC-111-01 Introduction to Sociology--Spring2000--McClelland.» 20 Feb. 200. Web.

20 Feb. 2012. <

«Sociology: Three Major Views in Sociology.» Web. 22 Feb. 2012.



How to cite this essay: