Should Smoking Be Banned in Public Places? - DebateWise Essay

Last updated: March 2, 2017

Should Smoking Be Banned in Public Places?

Yes because...Smoking should definatly be prohibited in public areas. The places they do allow cigarette smoking might lose some cash, however it could also be helpful with the health problems that happen. People beleive that someone who is not in the smoking cigarettes part of the general public spot will never be afflicted with the smoke, but smoke is able to distribute in a room and impact the people around. Smoking causes a lot of issues not merely for the smoker, however for the folks around. If some one had been to build a protest for people to end smoking in public areas, I bet that each non- cigarette smoker would say they ought to.

>>>>
I doubt your pubs are shutting down JUST BECAUSE smokers choose never to go. Oh by your logic, if some body is a pyromaniac and always has the need to light fires that its okay in order for them to run around in public places with fire, the non pyromaniacs should just avoid the fire. No big deal right?

No because...

smoking is up to the patient maybe not other people if people don't like smoke aviod the individuals who are smoking. I might perhaps not say that smoking should really be prohibited, but i actually do perhaps not believe it is necessary that people should go because far to own in order to avoid another person purely for them being a smoker. What I think they ought to do is get back to a smoking part with air vents leading upwards and from individuals within the smoking part, rendering it more unlikely that when a door is opened on smoking part, that smoke goes down. Also, businesess aren't losing some money, there are pubs which were here for decades throughout me that are being totally turn off. All because individuals will not go there because they cannot smoke.

Should Smoking Be Prohibited in Public Places?

Yes because...Obviously, the cloud of smoke exactly disturbs others; specially non-smokers feeling. Imagine sitting in a restuarant struggling to benefit from the meal because of the smoke from neighbor's dining table. It ought to be banned because the portion of non-smokers is more than active cigarette smokers so non-smokers have directly to clean air and smoke is more dangerous than in fact smoking and.

>>>
So are you currently saying pyromaniacs can light fires as they be sure to and theyre simply being discriminated against simply because they dont occupy wall road?

No because...

so can be you stating that the non-smokers of America don't have rights which America is all about most winning? presently we have been getting the occupy wall surface street that will be demoting the minority ruling. Because the non-smokers of America tend to be more populous than the cigarette smokers, does not mean that smoking must certanly be banned just to please them.

Should Smoking Be Banned in Public Places?

Yes because...Firstly, being in highschool and being surrounded by smoke after school isnt even a little bit pleasent. All the older kids smoke therefore the youger children always be influenced by the Juniors and Seniors. They are going to ultimately begin and gett to the habit of smoking. Its additionally really unhealthy. Next, being in a restaurant and having to smell that smoke while consuming isn't only disrepectful and annoying and once once more maybe not healthier. I respect those that smoke cigarettes away.
another explanation is smoking will end up a tendency, which lures some teenagers to do so. In fact, accordintg to some reliable studies, variety of smokers are quickly increasing these day. Naturally, we are able to smoke if this can influence no one. We together make some tigh and strict regulation for cigarette smokers if we dont wish to have any undesirable influences on our next generations.

>>>
You want to solve jobless by killing everybody else with cancer tumors? O.o

No because...

it seems clear if you ask me that a lot of men and women have their viewpoints against smoking cigarettes. nonetheless, smoking nevertheless has some positive aspect to economic edges. As an example, numerous countries all over the world, particularly tropical countries, like Cuba as well as England give consideration to smoke as a significant product to export to many other countries to have money or change other commodities. for that reason, they can use that money to buy some different types of industries. also, within my nation, selling cigarettes normally a straightforward job that everyone else can do to earn more cash, in spite of how old these are typically. Thus, this could easily bring some jobs for folks and partially solve rate of unemployment.

Should Smoking Be Banned in public areas?

Yes because...second-hand smoke is harmful, exactly like smoking cigarettes is. I must say I believe cigarette smoking in public areas must be banned, because it's not only harming the fitness of smokers, but in addition the health of others around them. I think, smoking in public places, specially places with lots of people is a pretty selfish action to take. i realize that carbon monoxide smoke is very annoying, because everytime i walk past some body smoking cigarettes, I usually feel that I need to hold my breath. smoking cigarettes really harms individuals lung area, but therefore can second-hand smoke. ah sorry, we misspelled the name. i implied «yes of course»

>>>
The issue with designated cigarette smoking areas isn't alway the general public, but also the employees. Imagine if stated company does not have cigarette smoking workers? Say in a restaurant they've a smoking area despite air flow. The bigger the area, the more expensive the vent, the more expensive the vent the greater effective it needs to be, the more powerful it needs to be the louder it really is. This could disrupt the non smokers as its simply an annoying sound designed to feed the poor addicts their poison. But imagine if we wanted to dull down the power or take away the vent altogether? Keep the area away from the non smokers appears okay but now you're asking the waiter/waitress, busboy, manager, cleaning crew, bar tender, ect. to endure these areas to provide, neat and target customers regardless of whether they smoke or otherwise not. No a manager doesn't have to go through and would then be making it their very own decision, however the other staff nevertheless has to do their work. Asking a restaurant to employ just employees that 'dont mind' inhaling the 2nd hand smoke is, for me, far fetched and from line. It really is bad sufficient that smokers reach go outside every 30 minutes to smoke cigarettes for 5-10 moments while non smokers have to work work work work all day long without those breaks. Now we are going to declare that cigarette smokers get jobs over them simply because cigarette smoker must inhale their cancer sticks?

No because...

Yes, it's a real issue. The smoke bothers every non-smoker. But a whole ban is not necessary. After all, those public places can save up some funds to allow them to build unique areas for non-smokers and people areas will be vent. In this way would thank both parts: the part of population that smokes and love smoking cigarettes while at a restaurant together with element of populace that does not smoke and dislike the smoke. So if somebody wants to smoke cigarettes, let him do. As long as it doesn't socialy harm anybody. By using this special areas for smokers, everybody else could be happy while the restaurants would make profit.
P.S.: sorry for my bad english but it is not my indigenous language. But i hope i proved my point.

Should Smoking Be Prohibited in Public Places?

Yes because...

although individuals state that cigarette smoking may be the cigarette smokers choice… its not… its in a few means however in all… its their option whether or not they wish to pay to die, but our choice whether we want them to in a position to smoke around us all, it isn't just harming them when they smoke cigarettes it is also harming united states. By cigarette smoking in public places most of the individuals who head to those places have to inhale their smoke although they've a made a selection to not smoke, they do not have a say in whether cigarette smoking will undoubtedly be a component in our life or not. However if it had been prohibited cigarette smokers could smoke in their house and vehicles, and harm themselves rather than other people.
P.S. Sorry if it didnt sound right, but I do believe u can get the points that I became attempting to make.
: )

No because...

nobody said you had to attend public places with smoking. So if ya'll want to grumble get someplace else.!

Should Smoking Be Prohibited in Public Places?

Yes because...Only 25% associated with material goes to the cigarette smoker additionally the sleep is kept for us. Those who have asthma must carry their inhaler in case of a smoker or cigarettes.

>>
If you wish to classify cigs as a harmful tool and claim it «the straight to bare arms» I quickly would have to believe everybody else that ever smokes in public areas ought to be arrested for trying homicide and for placing other people in harms means. We're a county constructed on equality, exactly why are you taking my right of being cancer tumors free away? We fought for the self-reliance and im glad we have it!

No because...

Um… HELLO? It is called the next amendment!!! The 2nd amendment means you've got the directly to keep hands, and a smoking is like a gun.Even though cigs are bad, they have been categorized as a harmful tool that can cause serious damage or harm. Additionally, right now we have been both inhaling campfire, barbecues, and also cannabis smoke! I actually do perhaps not see a ban on those items and I do not see a ban on cars? Do you? Think about we just ban vehicles? Also tabacco is a legal drug so is marijuana, so that you cannot just ban it! Also, we looked up that the smoke from cigarette smokers creates 0.00092per cent of carbon dioxide emissions on the planet! I've tons more but i am planning to run out of battery, so my final point is the fact that we're building our own natural disasters, like building energy flowers! Just two from the 50000 power plants on the planet produce more carbon dioxide versus smoke from smokers does in a year!

Should Smoking Be Banned in Public Places?

Yes because...

Smoking has to be banned due to individuals with asthma can not or barley breathing whenever smoke cigarettes is just about. Also in places like Disneyland, there was a couple of «smoke-zones» but however, in the event that you walk pass them you'll nevertheless inhale the smoke that they are smoking.

No because...

boo hoo!cry me a river.

Should Smoking Be Banned in public areas?

Yes because...

Non-smokers shouldn't must experience the bad choices of cigarette smokers. Non-smokers whom encounter smokers «Lighting up a ciggy» suffer because poorly since the cigarette smokers do. I do not believe it is right that some of the non-smokers need certainly to suffer, smokers just think about on their own not individuals around them which sickens me personally and I believe that it is time that non-smokers got some justice. I don't provide a fuck about the smokers, all We care about are the those who never smoke cigarettes who possess to suffer. Most of the smokers into the whole fucking globe may as well dig on their own a hole and smoke themselves to death, it will be a favour to any or all folks =).

No because...

You would take away the rights of smokers (individuals exactly like you, just with various practices) simply because they always smoke? Your argument appears really narrow-minded and superficial. Ignorance isn't bliss, therefore rather than continuing on your pointless rant about how «bad» smokers are, how about you accept the fact that not everybody gets the same standpoint as you do.By just how, to want sick upon several individuals is discrimination.

Should Smoking Be Banned in public areas?

Yes because...

i think, smoking must be prohibited in public areas. That is because non-smokers should not be forced to secondhand smoke against their might. Although it is an evident etiquette to not smoke cigarettes when surrounded by people, many cigarette smokers don't appear to care so much about any of it. For example, it isn't that hard to find a person smoking cigarettes at a bus stop no matter if there are young girls around him/her. There must be rules restricting people who have small regard the well-being of others. Another reason smoking must be banned in public areas could be because of the garbage problem. Few smokers dispose of their smoking butts in to the trash cans. Most of them just throw it regarding the roads. The roads will likely to be much cleaner if smoking is prohibited. However, cigarette smokers really should not be addressed unfairly. There ought to be more places in which only cigarette smokers can smoke easily. Therefore cigarette smoking ought to be banned in public places but more smoking areas is built and.

No because...

Secondhand smoking is an issue, I agree. But a complete ban of smoking in public is unecessary. In fact, i really believe that with a ban, more individuals will decide to smoke since it may well be more of a rebellious / unlawful act (like medications in the present culture). To your remark about «rules limiting those who have little respect for the wellbeing of others», I have no one thing to say but shame you. Cigarette smoking is a selection via see your face. You cannot inform that is a smoker from just taking a look at them (unless impacted greatly by cigarette smoking), just like you simply cannot tell who is a thief from yet another client at a store. Because they smoke, doesn't mean that they are out for individuals who don't. I have friends whom smoke cigarettes, who're excellent individuals, yet i actually do perhaps not smoke myself. Cannot make judgements upon a small grouping of individuals predicated on stereotypes.Overall, I think that smoking cigarettes should not be banned in public places, but that businesses / businesses should certainly control if cigarette smoking must certanly be permitted.

Should Smoking Be Banned in Public Places?

No because...

look, everybody should not be so botherd about smoking cigarettes and live along with it. All cigarette smokers go outside to possess a smoke (at the very least in nations in which it really is banned inside), non smokers stay in the pub (or anywhere you might be). Non smokers complain about everyones wellness, but smokers are not stupid, they understand it can harm them.
no certainly not this will be a tipicall lie okay bye

Yes because...

If we shouldn't ban smoking because smokers are very well alert to medical issue, should we remove the rate limitations on most of the highways besides? Folks aren't stupid, they realize that rate driving may be dangerous in addition they do not care or they'll stop carrying it out… So people must certanly be permitted to drive for as fast as they need whether this may result in motor vehicle collisions which could do harms to other individuals. And smoking cigarettes must certanly be allowed too due to the fact cigarette smokers are not stupid plus don't care about their own health no matter if the smoke they produce can harm others. Identical principle right here, and obviously speed limitations is on, so should the ban of smoking? Tbh we're seriously not thinking about the method that you manage your quality of life; we do not care in the event that you care or quit or such a thing, we simply don't wish one to harm us in the same way we don't wish a vehicle hitting on us.yea this is also true

Should Smoking Be Prohibited in public areas?

No because...just what kills the most is Drinking you've got Heart problems, Liver, Cancer, Drunk Drivers,Talk about wellness, place the no cigarette smokers sign up so cigarette smokers may have rights too, have them away, We are old enough to make exactly what life we would like put a baned in it or build a bubble to put all none smokers in or build places only for cigarette smokers keep subscribes to help keep none cigarette smokers away. observe they enjoy it, THEY DO SAY WE'VE A FREE CANADA? WHERE

thank you
joanne bc

Yes because...http://lungcancer.about.com/od/whatislungcancer/f/lungcancerdeaths.htm

^135,000 perish per year from lung cancer tumors caused by smoking cigarettes in the US
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6089353/ns/health-addictions/t/alcohol-linked-us-deaths-year/#.T5fZG7OmiRw

^ 75,000 die per year from alcohol associated deaths in the US

What kill the absolute most is Smoking` you'd lung cancer, in addition to a rise in the likely-ness of cardiovascular disease, stroke. Besides lung cancer you are vulnerable to many other cancers including pancreas, stomach, esophagus, kidney, mouth, neck and vocal folds. Though smoking doesn't have effects like dui it does kill infants inside womb if the mom is smoking. Plus it launch of toxic chemicals into the atmosphere that change non-smokers into victims. Your free canada could be the non poluted atmosphere, the safer environment produced by the shrinking of public cigarette smoking

http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/health_effects/effects_cig_smoking/

Yes, I completely agree with your argument that we have all the proper to smoke. But whatever they don't possess the right doing should inflict the problems onto us who possess taken the free option not to ever. Passive smoking cigarettes is enough to offer someone COPD, Lung Cancer and Cardiovascular illnesses, so just why should we suffer because you wish to practise a disgusting habit?

Should Smoking Be Banned in public areas?

No because...

What provides the government the proper to inform us to put signs up to state smokers allowed or even to tell cigarette smokers to remain out? This is certainly similar to the white only/no blacks indications there used to be. They're rightly considered discriminatory that smoking cigarettes indications should meet the same fate.

Yes because...You are sooooo incorrect. the signs don't state «no smokers» they do say «no smoking». They are not saying you can't get in, they have been saying you can't smoke in their. It is not saying you might be any less of someone, you are actually using it this way which ultimately shows an indication of despair, to tell the truth. It isn't an attack against you (or kind of person) but against an action. Its just like the way you cannot take a gun on an airplane. They truly aren't saying hunters cant go on the airplane, they cannot be waving a gun around regarding plane.

They're perhaps not demanding you give up smoking but enforcing you respect those around you that do n't need to die of cancer tumors. Learn something for as soon as, please.

Should Smoking Be Prohibited in public areas?

No because...They should begin aided by the drinking and driving and never worrier about the cigarette smokers if the none smokers dont like well its to bad its maybe not there life its our life its our health and wellness YOU SEE MORE AND MORE PEOPLE KILLING OTHERS BY DRINKING AND DRIVING AND JAY WALKING THINK ABOUT CREATING DRINKING INSIDE PARKS AS WELL AS ON THE STREET WHERE THE CIGARETTE SMOKERS AREN'T PERMITTED TO BE AROUND YET SOMEHOW WE'LL GET FINED WHY DONT THEY WORRIER REGARDING CARS BUSES FIRETURCKS ITS ALL POLUTION THAT WHERE MOST OF US GET SICK FROM CAN THERE BE POLUTION ITS NOT THE SMOKERS AND INGESTING AND DRIVING CAUSE LIVER FAILER THE GOVERNMENT is total incorrect towards cigarette smokers the us government MUST LOOK AT THE INGESTING AND DRIVING AND SO THEY USED TO declare COMPLIMENTARY CANADA WHEREIN BULLSHIT THE ABSOLUTE MOST NONE CIGARETTE SMOKERS ARE VICTIMS OF ALCOHOALISIM ANYWAYS THEY NEED TO PUT THIS ON FACEBOOK TO DISCOVER WHAT INDIVIDUALS declare CONCERNING THE SMOKER CAUSE THERE'S MORE SMOKERS THEN NONE SMOKERS

ALINE CHARBONNEAU

they're buses, automobiles, vehicles, suttles, airplanes they need to place a ban on those ideas be noticed side in the moring take an excellent wiff which killing united states smoking is only 1 percent of what's killing us

Yes because...i would really like to begin this counter-debate by saying the truth is more drunk driving fatalities than smoker fatalities because news reporters report motor vehicle collisions, perhaps not cancer victims.

Secondly, Please, do a little research: http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/health_effects/effects_cig_smoking/

I'd like to quote: «More fatalities are caused each year by tobacco usage than by all fatalities from individual immunodeficiency virus (HIV), illegal drug use, alcohol use, car accidents, suicides, and murders combined»

Third, id prefer to inform you your debate being typed in random caps is making me personally feel that you do not really understand a lot of everything you're referring to. Debating in a naive way only makes me feel like your information is built on viewpoint alone. Well, maybe it is also your insufficient periods and concerns marks. You dont have any end to sentence and its particular difficult to follow.

None-the-less cigarette smoking is killing people, like it or not. Your free canada may be the cleaner atmosphere. When it comes to buses, automobiles, trucks while the type, what has a much better purpose? Cigarettes for cancer of cars for transportation? Not only this, but arguing the manner in which you are could only end up in the loss of another thing thats great.

Should Smoking Be Banned in Public Places?

No because...

The actual only real people who concern on their own with other peoples cigarette smoking are either those that stay to make a dollar from product sales of snake oil or mindless automatons that think what they're told. SHS doesn't cause cancer. It does not cause cardiac arrest. It generally does not cause asthma attacks. If you think any one of those, you might be simply a useful idiot. NO MATTER IF IT DID...Lets suppose that one tenth of 1 percent for the population were in fact vunerable. (In truth, the actual truth, you're 4 times prone to perish from a meteor impact than SHS; but we digress) Should a company owner that has taken all threat of starting a small business that suits the 99.9% have to appeal to the 1/10per cent? The world is a rough destination cupcake. I didn't cause your trouble, so I have always been perhaps not obliged to bankrupt myself to cater to you. Don't like the cigarette smoking? Keep and good riddance!

Yes because...

are you currently one particular individuals who are like «hmmm i don't believe this though they did a report and i didn't»? because thats everything you're saying.

Should Smoking Be Prohibited in public areas?

No because...

If by general public places you suggest any place where people are obligated to get, I'm able to see banning it for the comfort of all concerned. Such places would add any publicly funded building e.g. libraries, post offices, federal government workplaces etc… in privately owned organizations where people elect to go like restaurants, pubs, cinemas, malls etc… NO! Smoking or non-smoking should be no one else's option nevertheless the owner's. Do not like the owner's choice, cannot get.

Yes because...

Making the non-smokers battle though their days just because a smoker can not pay their addiction for a couple of hours just shows just how poor cigs actually allow you to be, it demonstrates the purpose which they ought to be prohibited from general public places.

Should Smoking Be Banned in Public Places?

No because...

It real

Yes because...

This is not an argument it is a declaration of reality (or perhaps). Plus its more of an argument for idea as it suggests that smokers never value the effect they are wearing others as well as desire to exacerbate the issue by 'puff[ing] in [yo]ur face'. Should this be the actual situation then legislation is necessary to avoid them being a public nuisance.

Should Smoking Be Banned in public areas?

No because...

Its our option if we wanna damage ourselves perhaps not yours!

Yes because...

Only if you a, dont damage others by ever smoking close to them and exposing them to smoke and b, buy your personal health care (or rather spend up to you are taking from the medical system).

Should Smoking Be Prohibited in Public Places?

No because...

you will find areas in which cigarette smokers can smoke, so they need not ban it. some individuals that smoke should know that should you see others standing around they must have respect and get and smoke cigarettes someplace else. Non-smokers should also have a brain and believe if you notice someone smoking then disappear or inquire further if they can stay and smoke cigarettes some wherein else. but in-hailing other peoples smoke is irritating.

Yes because…


160shares

Category: HealthPoliticsSociety

How to cite this essay: