Shooting an Elephant LitChart Teacher Edition Essay

Introduction

Plot Overview

DetailedSummary
& AnalysisThemes

Quotes

CharactersSymbols

Theme Wheel

George Orwell works due to the fact sub-divisional police officer of Moulmein, a city inside Uk colony of Burma. Because he is, like the remaining English, a military occupier, he is hated by much of the village. Although Burmese never ever stage a complete revolt, they express their disgust by harassing Europeans at every possibility. Burmese journey Orwell during soccer games and hurl insults at him as he walks across the street. The young Buddhist priests torment him probably the most.

From outset, Orwell establishes that the power dynamics in colonial Burma are far from black-and-white. While he holds symbolic authority and army supremacy, Orwell continues to be powerless to end the jibes and punishment he gets from oppressed Burmese.

ActiveThemes

Colonialism

' data-html='true' data-placement='auto bottom' data-toggle='popover' data-trigger='hover'>Power' data-html='true' data-placement='auto bottom' data-toggle='popover' data-trigger='hover'>

The abuse he is suffering from Burmese confuses Orwell, because he could be “theoretically—and secretly” on the part, and against the oppressive Uk empire he serves. His work handling wretched prisoners gives him a close-up view of “the dirty work of Europe” and makes him feel accountable for their role in colonialism. He's yet to comprehend your British empire is waning, and can quickly be replaced with a whole lot worse regimes. However, while Orwell considers the empire an unconscionable tyranny, he still hates the insolent Burmese whom torment him. This conflicted mind-set is typical of officers within the Uk Raj, he explains.

Colonialism causes contradictory thinking and pits various sets of Orwell’s axioms against each other. His morality staunchly opposes the abuses that result from kingdom and his own part because kingdom, but he is unable to overcome their visceral urge to avenge the indignities he suffers as a result of the Burmese. His knee-jerk resentment at being humiliated—coupled with an implied sense that people humiliating him should see him as effective and their better—seems become because effective as his higher-order ethics.

ActiveThemes

Colonialism

' data-html='true' data-placement='auto bottom' data-toggle='popover' data-trigger='hover'>Principles' data-html='true' data-placement='auto bottom' data-toggle='popover' data-trigger='hover'>

Related Quoteswith Explanations

1 day, a incident takes places that offers Orwell understanding of the actual nature of imperialism together with reasons behind it. He gets a call from another policeman, informing him that a rogue elephant is causing damage into the town. Orwell heads toward the affected region. On your way, locals explain your elephant is not wild, but instead a domesticated the one that has had an attack of “must.” “Must” does occur when tame elephants, held in chains, break their restraints and get berserk. The Burmese have now been not able to restrain the elephant. Its “mahout,” or handler, pursued it into the wrong direction and it is now twelve hours away. On its rampage, the elephant has damaged public and private home and killed livestock.

Orwell can better comprehend imperialism through his run-in with all the elephant since the elephant functions as a symbol of colonialism. Like, just like the Burmese who've been colonized and who abuse Orwell, the elephant has been provoked to destructive behavior when you are oppressed. While its destructive behavior, together with Burmese’ more slight rebelliousness might not be unequivocally good things, they have been made understandable offered the oppressive conditions both the elephant while the Burmese have experienced to endure.

ActiveThemes

Colonialism

' data-html='true' data-placement='auto base' data-toggle='popover' data-trigger='hover'>

Orwell goes to a nearby where the elephant was final spotted, which will be among the town’s poorer districts. He tries to determine the state of affairs, but, as is typical in their experience of Asia, he finds that the story makes less much less sense the greater amount of he learns about this. The neighborhood’s inhabitants give such conflicting reports that Orwell nearly concludes your entire tale had been a hoax. Abruptly, he hears a commotion nearby and rounds a corner to locate a “coolie”—a laborer—lying dead inside mud, crushed and skinned alive by the rogue elephant. The mutilated corpse has been in excruciating pain. Orwell requests a subordinate to create him a gun strong enough to shoot an elephant.

Just as that Orwell will not comprehend precisely how he fits into the power dynamics of colonial Burma, he has also difficulty finding a clear-cut narrative of the elephant’s rampage. Evidently, colonialism plus the energy dynamics it entails are way too convoluted to be contained within one simple perspective.

ActiveThemes

Colonialism

' data-html='true' data-placement='auto bottom' data-toggle='popover' data-trigger='hover'>

Related Quoteswith Explanations

Orwell’s subordinate returns with all the gun, and locals reveal that the elephant is in a nearby rice paddy. Orwell walks towards the industry, and a sizable group from the neighbor hood follows him. The townspeople, have been previously bored with the destructive elephant, have observed the weapon and are also excited to see the beast shot. Orwell seems uncomfortable—he hadn't planned to shoot the elephant, and asked for the rifle just for self-defense.

Once more, the Burmese may actually wield power over Orwell, subverting the colonial hierarchy. He's not any longer an authority figure, but alternatively a spectacle, and the force of this Burmese’ anticipation is starting to make Orwell feel he cannot totally get a grip on exactly how he handles this matter.

ActiveThemes

Colonialism

' data-html='true' data-placement='auto bottom' data-toggle='popover' data-trigger='hover'>Power' data-html='true' data-placement='auto bottom' data-toggle='popover' data-trigger='hover'>Performance' data-html='true' data-placement='auto base' data-toggle='popover' data-trigger='hover'>

The audience reaches the rice paddies, and Orwell places the elephant standing beside the road. The pet is calmly eating grass. Killing an elephant is similar to destroying “a huge and costly bit of equipment,” and after seeing the peaceful creature, Orwell realizes that he must not shoot it. Orwell suspects that the animal’s attack of “must” will soon be over. He comprises their brain to merely watch the elephant to ensure it does not become aggressive once again, and doesn't plan on harming it.

Just as he empathizes because of the oppressed Burmese, Orwell recognizes your elephant is a calm creature which has been driven to rebellion by its mistreatment. Because it is both a harmless animal and a valuable piece of property, its clear that there's no ethical or practical reason to hurt the elephant. Remember that the Uk most of Burma had been essentially an invaluable piece of property—another metaphorical link involving the elephant and colonialism.

ActiveThemes

Colonialism

' data-html='true' data-placement='auto bottom' data-toggle='popover' data-trigger='hover'>Principles' data-html='true' data-placement='auto bottom' data-toggle='popover' data-trigger='hover'>

However, after he makes this choice, Orwell glances right back during the audience behind him. It offers swelled to over two thousand people, all of who are excitedly expecting to begin to see the elephant’s demise. Orwell feels as though he is a magician tasked with entertaining them, and understands that he's now compelled to shoot the elephant.

Orwell reneges on his ethical and practical conclusions very nearly as quickly as he means they are. By being positioned in front of an audience, Orwell was forced to defend myself against a performative persona which makes him work counter to every reasonable impulse he has.

ActiveThemes

Colonialism

' data-html='true' data-placement='auto base' data-toggle='popover' data-trigger='hover'>Power' data-html='true' data-placement='auto base' data-toggle='popover' data-trigger='hover'>Principles' data-html='true' data-placement='auto bottom' data-toggle='popover' data-trigger='hover'>Performance' data-html='true' data-placement='auto bottom' data-toggle='popover' data-trigger='hover'>

Related Quoteswith Explanations

Their incapacity to resist the crowd’s bloodlust makes Orwell realize that their authority over the locals is a hollow type of energy. Orwell, the imperialist, cannot do just about anything besides what the Burmese anticipate him to do. He could be constrained with to “impress” the empire’s topics by embodying the “conventionalized figure” of Western authority. In this way, Orwell reflects, “when the white man turns tyrant it really is his own freedom which he destroys.” Orwell understands that he committed to killing the elephant the minute he ordered he be brought a rifle. He entertains the possibility of doing absolutely nothing and permitting the elephant live, but concludes that this would result in the audience laugh at him. Their entire mission as a colonialist, he says, just isn't to be laughed at—thus, sparing the elephant isn't an option.

Inside important moment associated with the tale, Orwell articulates the paradox of colonialism. By restricting the freedom of other people, the British have really forced on their own to consider a small, exaggerated role so that you can keep their grip on authority—and hence limited their particular freedoms much more sharply. He cannot tolerate mistreatment from the Burmese, although he realizes that he, as a colonist, is within the wrong. It is deeply ironic, and tragic, that Orwell is compelled to entrench himself further in barbarism, simply because he seems that propriety dictates he achieve this. This is the paradox of colonialism—that colonial propriety involves force the colonizer to behave barbarously.

ActiveThemes

Colonialism

' data-html='true' data-placement='auto bottom' data-toggle='popover' data-trigger='hover'>Power' data-html='true' data-placement='auto base' data-toggle='popover' data-trigger='hover'>Principles' data-html='true' data-placement='auto base' data-toggle='popover' data-trigger='hover'>Performance' data-html='true' data-placement='auto bottom' data-toggle='popover' data-trigger='hover'>

Still, Orwell will not wish to kill the beast. It appears “grandmotherly” to him; killing it would be a kind of murder. Furthermore, killing an elephant is a waste of a costly commodity. The locals tell Orwell that the elephant has held to it self, but may charge if provoked. Orwell decides that the easiest way to carry out the situation would be to approach the elephant to test its temperament and just damage the animal if it behaved aggressively. But for this would endanger Orwell, and even worse still, he would look like an idiot in the event that elephant maimed him in front of the natives.

Orwell’s compassionate reasoning helps it be appear as if his nobler impulses may yet prevail. Unfortuitously, their desire not to be laughed at trumps his other motivations—in reality, he is more afraid of humiliation—and possibly for the method that humiliation might affect the neighborhood's sense of him as an expert figure—than he is of physical damage! It is clear your conventions of imperialism make Orwell feel compelled to execute a certain inhumane and irrational role. In spite of their reasoned introspection, he cannot resist what that the part forces him to make in order to show his power.

ActiveThemes

Colonialism

' data-html='true' data-placement='auto base' data-toggle='popover' data-trigger='hover'>Power' data-html='true' data-placement='auto base' data-toggle='popover' data-trigger='hover'>Principles' data-html='true' data-placement='auto base' data-toggle='popover' data-trigger='hover'>Performance' data-html='true' data-placement='auto base' data-toggle='popover' data-trigger='hover'>

Related Quoteswith Explanations

There was only one thing Orwell can do. He loads the gun, lies on the road, and takes aim during the elephant. The audience sighs in expectation. Orwell aims at the elephant’s head—too far forward hitting the mind, he thinks—and fires. The audience roars in excitement, as well as the elephant appears suddenly weakened. After a little bit of time, the elephant sinks to its knees and begins to drool. Orwell fires once more, plus the elephant does not fall—instead, it wobbles straight back onto its feet. A third shot downs the elephant. Because it tumbles to the ground, however, it trumpets and appears to grow also larger, and its particular autumn shakes the earth on which Orwell lies.

The description of this elephant’s physical stress is excruciating, and Orwell plainly promises to emphasize the barbarity of their choice and actions. It's particularly notable that the elephant appears to be at its many magnificent just like it falls. This illustrates that at the elephant’s minute of physical beat, it only becomes an even more powerful symbol associated with the irrational savagery of colonialism.

ActiveThemes

Colonialism

' data-html='true' data-placement='auto bottom' data-toggle='popover' data-trigger='hover'>Power' data-html='true' data-placement='auto bottom' data-toggle='popover' data-trigger='hover'>Principles' data-html='true' data-placement='auto bottom' data-toggle='popover' data-trigger='hover'>Performance' data-html='true' data-placement='auto bottom' data-toggle='popover' data-trigger='hover'>

Related Quoteswith Explanations

The elephant lies on a lawn, breathing laboriously. Orwell waits because of it to perish, nonetheless it continues to inhale. He fires at its heart, nevertheless the elephant scarcely generally seems to notice the bullets. Orwell is distressed to start to see the elephant laboring to die, demonstrably in agonizing discomfort, so he fires their smaller-caliber rifle into its human body countless times. These bullets do nothing; the elephant continues to inhale torturously. Orwell departs the scene, struggling to bear the elephant’s putting up with any more. He could be later on told that the elephant took a half hour to die. Soon thereafter, the Burmese stripped the meat off its bones.

There's nothing humane about Orwell’s killing of the elephant. He will not even understand enough about marksmanship—or elephants—to destroy the elephant painlessly. In the same way, the Uk empire is inhumane perhaps not from prerequisite, but alternatively away from reactionary ignorance regarding both the land it's colonized and pernicious way that colonization acts on both colonized together with colonizer. Meanwhile, the Burmese’ readiness to eat the elephant underscores the desperation of these situation, and also the manner in which colonial oppression has made them give attention to survival rather than ethical outrage during the elephant’s brutal death.

ActiveThemes

Colonialism

' data-html='true' data-placement='auto base' data-toggle='popover' data-trigger='hover'>Principles' data-html='true' data-placement='auto bottom' data-toggle='popover' data-trigger='hover'>

Related Quoteswith Explanations

Orwell’s option to kill the elephant had been controversial. The elephant’s owner had been upset, but, as an Indian, had no appropriate recourse. Older British consented with Orwell’s option, but younger colonists thought it absolutely was inappropriate to kill an elephant because it killed a coolie, since they're of opinion that elephants are more valuable than coolies. Orwell notes that he is lucky the elephant killed a person, since it gave their own actions appropriate justification. Finally, Orwell wonders if some of their comrades understood he killed the elephant “solely to avoid looking a fool.”

The aftermath of Orwell’s killing of elephant illustrates the way the colonial cycle perpetuates itself. Those harmed by the physical violence are either silenced—like the elephant—or lack recourse—like its owner. Other people, from more detached perspectives, can rationalize barbaric actions with appropriate justifications started in racism that underpins colonization. The important point of Orwell’s final observation is that, while logic can be look over into colonialism from a distance, the true inspiration of its savagery is simply the triumph of irrational insecurity and role-playing over ethics or individual compassion.

ActiveThemes

Colonialism

' data-html='true' data-placement='auto bottom' data-toggle='popover' data-trigger='hover'>Power' data-html='true' data-placement='auto bottom' data-toggle='popover' data-trigger='hover'>Principles' data-html='true' data-placement='auto bottom' data-toggle='popover' data-trigger='hover'>Performance' data-html='true' data-placement='auto base' data-toggle='popover' data-trigger='hover'>

Related Quoteswith Explanations

Cite This Page

Choose citation design:

Sobel, Ben. «Shooting an Elephant “Shooting an Elephant”.» LitCharts. LitCharts LLC, 7 Sep 2014. Web. 27 Might 2019.

Sobel, Ben. «Shooting an Elephant “Shooting an Elephant”.» LitCharts. LitCharts LLC, 7 Sep 2014. Internet. 27 May 2019.

Sobel, Ben. "Shooting an Elephant “Shooting an Elephant”." LitCharts LLC, September 7, 2014. Retrieved May 27, 2019. https://www.litcharts.com/lit/shooting-an-elephant/summary-and-analysis.

Sobel, Ben. «Shooting an Elephant “Shooting an Elephant”.» LitCharts LLC, September 7, 2014. Retrieved May 27, 2019. https://www.litcharts.com/lit/shooting-an-elephant/summary-and-analysis.

Important Quote and Explanation from

(read the complete quote with explanation and citation information)

Previous

Overview

Next

Themes

OK

LitCharts uses snacks to personalize our solutions. By utilizing our website, you acknowledge you have actually look over and understand our Cookie Policy, online privacy policy, and Terms of provider.

How to cite this essay: