Question:
Answer:
Introduction
While organizational change as described by Caetano (2012) is a necessity of time to endure business prosperity, Bennis and Nanus (2011) and Boston (2012) asserts that change is crucial for the long-term performance of the organization. Apparently, organizations may lose their market share and product or service reputation if they failed to adeptly prepare for the changing situations and working environment (Boston, 201). Further, different scholars have described the significance of organizational change differently (Caldwell, Hasan, & Smith, 2015). However, there is the consensus that for continued performance and sustainability, organizational change will be an indispensable ingredient.
While advocating organizational change is a singular element, the next remains on who is to initiate such changes in the organizations; take up practical actions and steps; who is the individual(s) in charge Ahmad. Researchers and scholars have had similar ground that the functions of the leader or leadership is important while resolving the concern of organizational change or managing organizations. Kilkelly (2014) observed that the functions of leadership is a primary while pursuing and managing organizational change. Additionally, Kilkelly observed that an effective leader could be the source of effective organizational change. Senior and Fleming in ‘Organizational Change’ discussed the role of leadership for current and future changing working environments. They perceived that an organization’s leadership is that organizations change agent, and was responsible for initiating change. As noted, leadership is vital and especially its implication for organizational change; change that is a need of the time aimed at continued performance and sustainability (Kattan, De Pablos Heredero, Montes Botella, and Margalina, 2016). Indeed, a leader could play a requisite role in determining the anticipated shape of an organization and assuming the required actions and steps, which are ingredients for the process.
As such, it is important to address the concern of what type of leadership is then feasible to elicit the needed change in this 21st-century organizations. At that point, Hamill (2011) categorically counted that the function of the leader was as fundamental for handling organizational change, as was for enduring the process to achieve organizational performance and survivability. Considering the complexity and how challenging the process of change may be as observed by Encombe (2008), it essential to have an effective and competent leadership that will adequately man the process and manage the situation (Bennis, 2011). Bennis further acknowledges that exceptional attributes, characteristics, and qualities are needed to develop a leader to bring forth organizational change and success in the long term.
Problem Statement
With globalization, the world has gradually transformed into a small global village; where there is an upsurging incidence of competitions and contentions amongst organizations (Gesell, 2010; Kwangduck Park, 2016). The scenario has become so vicious that only the most effective and prudent approach for organizations seeking performance and / or survival is by establishing and implementing innovative strategies in their operationalization, that are change oriented (Gesell, 2010). Markedly, organization change depicts today’s necessity. It is vital to any organization’s survival (Lo, Ramayah, Isa, and Jais, 2013). Indeed, originations are not only aware of this glare necessity but are also keen to equip themselves for the current and future changing trends as they pursue performance and sustainability. However, Yahaya and Ebrahim (2016) note that despite its significance, the pursuit of organizational change is remarkably very complex, challenging and gradual (Bennis and Nanus, 2012). The empirical review has indicated that more than 70% of organization-initiated changes have failed to achieve their goals (Nolan, 2007). Undeniably, leadership plays an indispensable role in realizing such organizational change, and thus the needed transformation. The pursuit of organizational change will need very highly competent and efficient leadership, which is well-versed and capable of achieving the most anticipated shape for the organization (Weidman, 2002; Northouse, 2004; Nolan, 2009). Additionally, leadership will help appropriately address the concern of organizational change.
Nonetheless, leadership in its sole state is insufficient (Weidman, 2002); but the effective and competent leadership that will adequately man the change process and manage the situation is what is needed to comprehend, appreciate, formulate and execute the most appropriate and needed change for the 21st century organizations (Senior and Fleming, 2006). But, the concern stands on what exceptional attributes, characteristics, skills, talent, competencies, and qualities are a prerequisite for an effective leadership that is looked up to bring the needed change (Caldwell, Hasan and Smith, 2015). Notably, visionary leadership executed under an innovative approach is vital in making this changes occurs successfully (Gesell, 2010; Bass, 2013). Significantly, it will also be necessary to understand the relationship between such effective leadership and the anticipated organization performance (Pardey, 2008). Previously, scholarly and research efforts have been driven towards the role of leadership paying attention to leadership characteristics and competencies to solve various organizations’ issues. They engaged various theories and styles to handle and manage the various organizations’ issues. However, they failed to address the relationship between effective leadership and organizational change.
As such, to narrow this gap, this study will examine the role that organizational leaders execute while seeking organization effectiveness; through performance and survivability, especially now and in the future. The study will assume the leader as the individual responsible for organizational change or one who is bestowed with overseeing institutional transformation; being a change agent. The leader is perceived as possessing not only the leadership capability but also, the competence quality. Indeed, the 21st century is marred with rapid transformations in technology, advancements in markets, changing consumer preferences and attitudes; thereby compelling the existent organizations to re-evaluate and re-view their way of business. Particularly, it is vital for these organizations to identify, understand, and adopt transformations in their business models as a response to the continued global and market changes noted above.
Research Objectivess
The study will evaluate the role played by leaders in achieving effectiveness in managing 21st-century organizations. To achieve this core objective, the study will also;
Assess the concept of effective leadership and the various types of effective leadership behaviourb.Examine the major competencies (Cognitive, Functional, and Social) practices important for developing an effective organizational leaderc. Evaluate the influence of effective leadership on organizational changed. Determine to what level the achieved organizational change contributes to organizational performancee. Determine the challenges faced by global leaders in the 21st century organizationsResearch QuestionsThe study will also seek k to address the following questions;
In what manner does leadership behaviour relate to organizational change?
In what manner does leadership behaviour relate to organizational performance?
Justification of the Project
In order to meet the ever-changing business environment and the highly competitive trends, organizations need to transform their business models based on the technologies, trends, and future concerns. The dire necessity requires the most effective and competent leadership for organizations (Nolan, 2009). As stated by Hamill (2011) it should be a leadership that is not only well-versed and capable of understanding and analyzing the 21st century’s business trends, but also proves effective and helpful to achieve management effectiveness. There is much significance of leadership when it implores vision and foster change through an innovative approach to achieving that vision prosperously. Hence, noting the essentiality of this background, the study will, therefore, explore this assertion through analysis of theoretical and empirical literature as well as engage case-study analysis in the study’s sample population. It will immensely draw inferences from the realms of organizational change, leadership competencies, and sustainable performance. Thus, a model entailing visionary and innovative leadership will be developed highlighting the relationship between leadership and sustained organizational performance anchored upon leadership characteristics, especially vision and innovativeness.
Expected Research Output/Outcome
Figure 1 Conceptual Framework
The above framework will help the study evaluate the role played by leaders in achieving effectiveness in managing 21st-century organizations.
Research Hypotheses
From the above depiction, the study will also test the following Null Hypothesis;
H (1): Leadership competencies have no influence on effective leadership
H (1): Effective leadership has no influence on organizational performance
Methodology
Notably, the study will engage a set of research techniques. Firstly, it will review previous literature, including theoretical and empirical review relevant to the subject matter (Bryman and Bell, 2007; Sharples, 2011). The descriptive research design will also include both qualitative and quantitative approaches (Sahin et al., 2011). The two approaches embed the blueprint for data collection, data measurement, and data analysis as related to the study objectives and questions. In so doing, for the data collection techniques, the study will employ case studies, surveys, and questionnaires. Data sources will include personal interviews, questionnaires, observations and interviews for primary data and library searches for secondary data (Smallbone et al., 2012). Further, data analysis will take the form of frequency and descriptive characteristics to characterize the study’s sample. This will include frequency distributions (tables, graphs, means, pie-charts etc.). Additionally, the study will employ a linear regression analysis (Cooper and Schindler 2001; Babbie 2013) to evaluate the relationship between effective leadership and sustained organizational performance anchored upon leadership competencies.
Moreover, the study research process will be hierarchical in nature taking into consideration the research stages as advanced by Kumar (1998) to explain the phenomenon of effective leadership as influencing organizational change, and thus organization performance (Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill 2003). The resultant outcome will offer an explanatory illustration of the subject matter, especially for the 21st-century organizations.
Organization of the Study
The study will involve;
Chapter One - that will present the background of the study, research problem, objectives and research questions, justification and the scope of the study
Chapter two – that will present the theoretical and empirical review, conceptual framework, and a critique of the review of literature
Chapter Three – that will present the research methodologies; including research design, data collection techniques & tools, data analysis techniques, data validity & reliability
Chapter Four – will present the research findings from analysis
Chapter Five – will present the summary of findings, conclusions and recommendations as pertains effective leadership and its role in achieving organization change, and eventually organizational performance.
Gantt Chart
The study will be performed based on the following schedules;
Research Task | Duration (Days) |
Chapter One | April – June 2016 |
Chapter Two | June 2016 |
Chapter Three | July 2016 |
Chapter Four | August – September 2016 |
Chapter Five | September – October 2016 |
Final Report | October 2016 |
Project Budget and Budget Justification
To achieve the study’s objectives and address the various research questions, the study will have to stick to a budget projection.
Research Task | Duration (Days) | Budget Projection |
Chapter One | April – June 2016 | $250 |
Chapter Two | June 2016 | $250 |
Chapter Three | July 2016 | $2200 |
Chapter Four | August – September 2016 | $700 |
Chapter Five | September – October 2016 | $100 |
Final Report | October 2016 | $500 |
Total | $4000 |
References
Ahmad, A., Halim Abdul Majid, A., & Lazim Mohd Zin, M. (2015). The Measurement of the Effectiveness of Leadership Styles for Organizational Commitment in Pakistan. Asian Social Science.
Babbie, E. (2013). The practice of social research (3rd Ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth Pub. Co.
Bass, B., Stogdill, R., & Stogdill, R. (2013). Bass & Stogdill's handbook of leadership (4th Ed.). New York: Free Press.
Bennis, W. & Nanus, B. (2011). Leaders: the strategies for taking charge. New York: Haper And Row,24(4), 503-508.
Boston, M. (2012). Management Decision and Research Center. Washington, DC, VA Health Services Research and Development Service, Office of Research and Development (Dept. of Veterans Affairs).
Bryman, A. & Bell, E. (2007). Business research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Caetano, A. (2012). Mudan?a organizacional e gest?o de recursos humanos. Observat?rio Do Emprego E Forma??o Profissional. Lisboa: Colprinter - Ind?stria Gr?fica, Lda, 25(3), 177-196.
Caldwell, C., Hasan, Z., & Smith, S. (2015). Virtuous leadership – insights for the 21st century. Journal of Mgmt Development, 34(9), 1181-1200.
Cooper, D. & Schindler, P. (2001). Business Research Methods (7th Ed.). Sydney: McGraw-Hil.
Dyos, A. (2005). Developing leaders to support a new vision at Genesis. Strategic HR Review, 4(5), 10-11.
Encombe, J. (2008). Equipping leaders for the 21st century. Strategic HR Review, 7(5), 23-27.
Hamill, P. (2011). Embodied leadership: towards a new way of developing leaders. Strategic HR Review, 10(5), 5-10.
Kattan, M., De Pablos Heredero, C., Montes Botella, J., & Margalina, V. (2016). Factors of Successful Women Leadership in Saudi Arabia. Asian Social Science, 12(5), 94.
Kilkelly, E. (2014). Creating leaders for successful change management. Strategic HR Review, 13(3), 127-129.
Kwangduck Park,. (2016). An Analysis on Relation between leadership styles and Organizational Performances in Long-Term Care Facilities. Korean Comparative Government Review, 20(1), 49-73.
Lo, M., Ramayah, T., Isa, A., & Jais, M. (2013). Leadership styles and financial services performance.IJMP, 6(4), 299.
Nolan, S. (2007). Leadership in the 21st century. Strategic HR Review, 6(5), 2-2.
Nolan, S. (2009). Followership. How Followers Are Creating Change and Changing Leaders. Strategic HR Review, 8(3).
Northouse, P. (2004). Leadership. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
Pardey, D. (2008). Next generation leaders. Strategic HR Review, 7(3), 32-36.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2003). Research methods for business students. Harlow, England: Prentice Hall.
Weidman, D. (2002). Executive Perspective: Redefining Leadership for the 21st Century. Journal Of Business Strategy, 23(5), 16-18.
Yahaya, R. & Ebrahim, F. (2016). Leadership styles and organizational commitment: literature review.Journal Of Mgmt Development, 35(2), 190-216.