Rhetorical Analysis: Superman and Me Essay

Throughout contemporary civilization, reading is practiced utilizing the belief it is the gateway to education. The necessity of literacy in degree, and even a basic very early education, is noted in most classrooms today. In reality, most companies even consider literacy become a mandatory skill for some applicants, since it is assumed that a lot of grownups within time can read effectively. Even yet in my own experience, my moms and dads and instructors have advocated reading. From very early recitations of “See place Run” in kindergarten, to the nightly ritual of this bedtime story, reading is highly emphasized in my own childhood. I've memories of my father using me personally to bookstores and libraries as a young child, encouraging me to locate a book that'll inspire my imagination, including increase my reading proficiency. Even though my history is quite unique of that writer Sherman Alexie, in their essay “Superman and Me,” Alexie describes the importance of reading that people both hold dear. This will be obvious in his examples, as well as his style.

Alexie starts their essay with an anecdote about their introduction to reading, as he discovered to learn through a combination of Superman comics and their father’s publications (Alexie, 1997), and quickly transitions to the thesis of his essay: reading is a crucial skill for success. That is made evident by Alexie’s argument that reading ended up being a means of “saving [his] life” (Alexie, 1997, p. 326). Throughout his essay, Alexie juxtaposes their experience as a Native US student with a thirst for knowledge, with all the expectations on most Native US students, who have been expected by society not to are interested in training. The difference that Alexie drew between him and objectives of Native American pupils had been that Alexie had an almost obsessive interest in reading, which aided him “save their life” and start to become a fruitful writer. Mcdougal continues to compare their experience as a reader to the expectations which are set from him, stating that he ended up being an “Indian [child] whom [was] expected to be stupid” (Alexie, 1997, p. 326) inside classroom. Alexie argues that by reading “anything that had terms and paragraphs,” and cultivating a pastime in literacy, he had been “[refusing] to fail” (Alexie, 1997, p. 326). Alexie’s design also tries to persuade the reader to concur with the need for reading.

With mostly anecdotal proof, Alexie seems to be using an ethical mode of appeal. As previously mentioned previously, the writer over and over repeatedly uses the saying “trying to truly save my life” while discussing their reading habits. This repetition is employed to give you increased exposure of the importance of reading, in addition to to reinforce their thesis. Repetition normally based in the eighth paragraph, by which Alexie begins nearly every sentence with all the combination, “I read…” (Alexie, 1997, p. 326). This usage of anaphora is essential since it is another try to stress their experiences reading, as well as the general importance he puts on work of reading to ensure success. Alexie views reading not only as a kind of leisure, and as a way out of a life devoid of function. Alexie’s use of simple sentences in this same paragraph also attracts a broad market, without alienating poor readers.

Alexie concludes his essay with an event as a teacher, planing a trip to reservations, and wanting to appeal to pupils that bored with reading, stating that he's “trying to truly save our lives” (Alexie, 1997, p. 327). This cyclical occasion does not strengthen their argument for the significance of reading, but it does recommend his personal desire for reading as a means to ensure success. Alexie does conclude the essay with a persistent thesis, although he lacks proof outside of individual experiences. His utilization of repetition, anaphora, and easy sentences seems to appeal to a large market base, that is suitable for his argument of importance of reading. By including all visitors along with his easy form of writing, he's not alienating any bad readers, for whom the essay could be essential. In summary, in my opinion that Alexie formed a thorough, ethical argument, through their usage of anecdotal evidence and simple, informal style.


Alexie, Sherman. (1997) “Superman and Me.” The small Norton Reader, Very First edition, Melissa A. Goldthwaite. Ny: W. W. Norton & business, Inc., 2016, pp. 323-327


How to cite this essay: