Politics vote Essay

to a certain position. For example, a socialist could more easily get

voted into office since their constituents would no longer be afraid of

voting third-party, since their vote would transfer should their

candidate of choice perform poorly.

The popularization of nuanced third parties would create

candidates that are not fearful of losing the support of their

constituency, since their constituency would be far more particular

than that of the current Republican and Democrat parties in the US.

They would not have to placate vast swathes of people who really

have rather different political views, yet all fall under the same party

affiliations, creating possibilities for real progress. However, the

segmentation of the two large political parties could have adverse

effects on action potential, as the more political views represented",

the more views will clash. At the same time, if majority of the

population is not ready for change, as represented by the multitude

of political parties, then the will of the people is to not make changes

to government or law structure, democracy in its simplest form. Still",

the threshold for passing bills would likely have to be lowered, since a

majority would be difficult to accomplish, since more diverse

population is being represented.

The IRV method of voting is not the most complex voting

system, PL for example has many more intricacies, but countries

with very low literacy [3] might find issue with the ability of the

population to fill out the ballot and understand how their votes

would be cast; this is not so great a problem in the United States.

The math behind the quota system3

is somewhat complicated, and

thus a population with little education could potentially not understand the inner workings of the IRV system. As opposed to low

literacy, this actually is a problem for the United States, as the

United States is ranked 27th in mathematics worldwide by UNESCO

[26]. There is an argument to be made on behalf of simply ignoring

this issue altogether, however, since the general population does not

need to understand the intricacies of the system, just how to vote.

Minority control is the most respected criticism of IRV, despite

these arguments. The introduction of IRV would certain allow

minority parties to hold seats in the Senate and House of

Representatives, and while apparently good, this might have some

harsh repercussions. Allowing small groups to have some control over

the political landscape would potentially allow extremists to blockade

bills to their desire. Many critics point to the rise of dictatorial states

throughout Eurasia in the 20th century, particularly the Nazi party’s

ability to rise through to power through a democratic system, seizing

control with a minority of seats, less that 30% [5]. This is an unjust

copmarison, however, because Hitler’s rise to power involved false

flags, domestic terrorism, and fear mongering tactics which would not

be adaptable to the present day United States [12].

How to cite this essay: