"Obsession" Movie Review Essay & Film Analysis

How to create or identify a genius? This is the main question that tries to answer the American director and screenwriter Damien Shazel the music psychological drama "Whiplash" (. Letters whip, whip), released in Russia under the name
history starts with the "Obsession", when Andrew Niemann. - a young drummer and freshman prestigious Conservatory, dreaming of becoming a great musician, and takes notes to his jazz band known teacher and conductor Terence Fletcher. In the film, it was one of the best jazz orchestras in the country, and for a young musician to get there meant to secure a successful musical career.
When he came to the first rehearsal, Andrew for the first time faced with the procedure manual, which was practiced by Fletcher. It was to create a team atmosphere of fear and universal competition. The orchestra reigns downright army discipline and bullying. When the Fletcher all team members stand and, with downcast eyes, expecting the team, if convicted of his sentence. No wonder, because despotic Fletcher throws any of the false play a note, while swearing like a trooper and throwing chairs in the musicians.
The film beautifully illustrates that fierce competition that prevails among musicians. For the sake of career and success, they are ready not only to work hard to the point of exhaustion, suffering bullying manager, but also as it is commonly called, to go over the heads of each other. Here, the question can not be a partnership of mutual assistance. Everyone is obsessed with personal selfish motives, caused by the fear of losing a competitive and stay on the sidelines of life.
The film clearly shows the attitude to the talent of the masses under capitalism. The most important mechanism for creating outstanding sports, arts and other areas of activity is the social selection. Teaching methods are intended to squeeze out the last people sweat, exhaust them. Man steady, with good instincts, sustain it for at least the consequences of such barbaric methods of training are not will be felt at the same time. But people less gifted, less capable, not stand the pace and quickly complete the training, and with it will lose any chance to implement creative career, there are also cases where due to the grueling training people remained crippled (especially relevant is in the sport). A few geniuses luckies will shine with their one-sided skills in public, while hundreds of crippled destinies will remain forever for the 'backstage' bourgeois forge talents. Such is the price of success brilliant creative figures under capitalism. Obviously, the purpose of the deposits from the representatives of the masses with our modern social system is not necessary. Makings most people are not so great that they can be developed to the level of the highest genius. So these people are not interested in, with them will not be able to get profit. And so their development in the interests of capital is not included.
Shazel in his film, perhaps unwittingly reveals a cast of contemporary society. Relationships in this musical collective is a reflection of the domination of private property and market competition under capitalism. They can not be different. An employee in this system is doomed to sell their labor, while competing with their own kind. Here, the English title of the film is more appropriate and reflects the essence: «Whiplash» - can be translated as' work from the sticks. " If earlier slaves, beating with sticks, forced to perform every whim of the owner, now slaves to the employees represented by themselves perform every whim of the employer, just to get the necessary for the good of survival. You may say that I exaggerate, you do not feel on themselves this yoke, but tomorrow, going to the store and seeing the price skyrocketed, you poskrebet pocket and very soon will be ready to do anything to feed his family.
Motive musicians playing in the orchestra of Fletcher and his suffering bullying was the same as described above, their purpose, in spite of everything, to win the competition, while maintaining its place in the famous orchestra in order to ensure their comfortable existence in the future.
in an interview with Andrew Fletcher reveals his motives, he I was obsessed with the idea to give the world a "new Louis Armstrong, Charlie Parker's new." Placing musicians in extreme conditions of severe competition, he wanted to get them to overcome the 'limit of the expected'. In the end, to find the right one brilliant musician, he has ruined the lives of many others who are in different circumstances and under different approaches could achieve high levels of performance.
As for the main character, then it is driven by their ambitious thoughts, could still overcome this 'limit' and achieve genius in understanding the author of the film. However, what is this genius? Shazel understands it in a very narrow sense, as an extremely high level of performance (in our case, the drummer). Andrew all the best years spent solely on improving their skills, practicing hours on the flight, completely abandoning his personal life. Of course, as a result of the enormous effort he has perfectly mastered the techniques of the game, but what happened to his personality ?! Giving all the time the drums, he did not develop in other directions. He reminds me of the English working 19 in., Which Engels wrote in his book "The Working Class in England." Monotonous, monotonous work of perfecting it one part of the body responsible for the fulfillment of the necessary operations, thus completely spoiling human
Andrew, like most of us, could not understand the main thing:. Elevation price was not only the defective development, but also the lives of others! In an all-out competition, the success of any one means the failure of many others. root of the problem goes deep, basic foundations of capitalist society. Production of material wealth, based on the exploitation of private property and commodity-money relations, pushes people to the competitive model of behavior. If not you, then you -. Is the leitmotif of the modern era
only team based on a partnership, where each participant does not think about their own interests and ambitions, and for the welfare of the community as a whole is able to realize the potential of each. It operates different principle: individual personal development depends on the development of all team members. However, such a system has been implemented, requires a radical restructuring of the social relations, which is possible only with the abolition of exploitation, private property and commodity-money relations.

How to cite this essay: