"Lucky Number Slevin" Movie Review Essay & Film Analysis

For some reason, all of my reviews are similar to essays on the topic "How much I love this movie and why." I have the right! BUT ... What if they use? I began to wonder: who is the target audience section "Reviews" and came to the conclusion that the most advisable to read them if you have not seen the movie, and going to see. Being on the ground such competitor, I try to read reviews, wearing neutral. It is reasonable. As a rule, to create something (a review does not give not to take the same kind of creation) need inspiration. By accessing the page of the film and seeing a hundred, and even more reviews, of course there is an impression that the film worthwhile, since has inspired so many people. Yes, here's the problem: instead, to find out what it is so remarkable, you see a bunch of metaphors and epithets on his masterpiece, but it's still not the kind of information which is necessary to have before viewing. In general, all my previous reviews are built in the image and likeness of the above given error, therefore, decided to rehabilitate ...

P.S. No! The film all are a masterpiece, especially for my taste. Of the more than two thousand assessments kinopoisk only fifteen films set the highest score. "Lucky Number Slevin" - one of them. I think it's about saying something.
tezisno the main points ...
What is remembered?
main thing than I remembered a picture so is her style, which puts unnecessary obvious points. What am I talking about? Watching him, I was reminded of Dashiell Hammett detective novel "The Maltese Falcon". There's a scene in which the detective talking on the phone and at the disposal of the reader only its replica, but also understand them, what they say ...
'My joy, - he started when he joined - Miles was shot ... Yes, killed ... Control yourself ... Yes ... Report this Willow .. no, I'm not for anything she will not call. You'll have to. Clever ... And do not let her into my office ... Tell him that I'll come myself to it ... One of these days ... Yes, but specifically promised nothing ... That's all. You're an angel. So far? '
That film is the same! History completed, saturated and there is no excess.
Cast
Despite the fact that the film many famous actors, it still turned out good! O - Ren Ishii will remain, perhaps the most famous line Lucy Liu, but here I liked it more. Live it kind of turned out, the real and so sweet ... When something like it, it seems that the components of the change impossible. Captain Jack "Sparrow" NEO ... ... but I will note that as Slevin, in my opinion, could be anyone (about the others did not say, not with a charming smile Morgan play it evildoers).
Director
not see that name is not particularly well known, the main thing that coped very well!
Notes
familiarized with the criticism of other reviewers ... it is necessary to say something ...
< i> the film only with a claim to originality, but in fact it is what we have seen ...
Let those fantasize! A man accused of murdering his wife and her lover ... He is not guilty ... They put him ... He runs away ... sound familiar? We've seen it all? Yes! All together combined and were «The Shawshank Redemption» . As the film ?! Ahh! That's right! And then, as though the claim to originality, but unless it is bad?
bad copy "richevskih" films ...
here it altogether inappropriate comments! Not like so bad, and the like used so good? What are you speaking about?! Well, let the poet wrote a verse chorus, so what the second plagiarist, since conceived a rivet too pentameter? Verses something different! Here and there the same situation. Get a Guy to do a remake of this picture, and you will see that this turn is not the same Slevin. Yes similarities in style is there, but it is only a plus in the treasury of the film, we are talking about the style of Guy Ritchie ...
Excessive end
That seems to me the end of the film lasted fifteen minutes by force. Where then tightened? I remember the film «Casino», where I could not understand at all, when the climax at the end of the transition. Here, everything is transparent and dynamic. Miracle, not the end!
Dialogues "by Tarantino»
No, well here again! Quentin I respect, but to attribute all of the films in which there are lots of dialog, communication with Tarantino's ridiculous. Here, for example, in the film «Serenity Mission» a lot of similarities of character dialogue, and you know why this one does not speak? All elementary! Poke his nose in a rip-off film, which is in the ranking much nicer! And again! By analogy with Richie say that this comparison is a plus film.
I could endlessly comment on this movie, well, or transfer unsubstantiated claims about him, but the already tightened Forest nowhere ... summed up!
If you, whoever you are reading this review in the hope of finding an answer to the question: "Should I watch this movie» «! Yes » - I'll tell you without a shadow of a doubt. My review is intended only to convey my attitude and to clarify a couple of points. And the film itself, in turn, can either like it or not. That's how anyone! So, as they say in the company NIKE «Just do it» ! That is to say, Come and see ...
P.S. ... and make sure that you will like it!

How to cite this essay: