Freedom of religion is a principle that supports the freedom of a person or community, in public areas or private, to manifest religion or belief in training, practice, worship, and observance. Additionally includes the freedom to change an individual's faith or thinking.
Freedom of faith is recognized as by many people & most of countries to be a fundamental human right. In a nation with a situation faith, freedom of faith is generally considered to mean that the government permits spiritual techniques of other sects form state faith, and doesn't persecute believers in other faiths.Freedom of belief differs. It allows the best to think just what you, group or faith desires, but it doesn't always allow the directly to practice the faith or belief openly and outwardly in a public way.
HistoryMinerva as a symbol of enlightened knowledge protects the believers of religions (Daniel Chodowiecki, 1791)
Historically, freedom of faith has been utilized to make reference to the tolerance of various theological systems of belief, while freedom of worship has been defined as freedom of individual action. Each of these have actually existed to varying levels. Even though many countries have actually accepted some kind of spiritual freedom, this has also usually been restricted in practice through punitive taxation, repressive social legislation, and governmental disenfranchisement. Compare samples of individual freedom in Italy and/or Muslim tradition of dhimmis, literally «protected individuals» professing an officially tolerated non-Muslim religion.The Declaration for the Rights of Man and for the resident (1789) guarantees freedom of religion, provided that religious tasks usually do not infringe on public order with techniques detrimental to society.
In Antiquity, a syncretic point of view frequently permitted communities of traders to operate under their customs. Whenever street mobs of separate quarters clashed in a Hellenistic or Roman city, the matter was generally observed to be an infringement of community liberties.
Cyrus the Great established the Achaemenid Empire ca. 550 BC, and initiated a general policy of allowing religious freedom through the entire empire, documenting this on Cyrus Cylinder.
A few of the historic exceptions will be in areas where one of the revealed religions has been around a situation of energy: Judaism, Zoroastrianism, Christianity and Islam. Others have now been where in actuality the founded order has sensed threatened, as shown inside trial of Socrates in 399 BC or in which the ruler happens to be deified, like in Rome, and refusal to offer token sacrifice had been similar to refusing to just take an oath of allegiance. This was the core for resentment together with persecution of very early Christian communities.
Freedom of religious worship was created in the Buddhist Maurya Empire of ancient India by Ashoka the Great in third century BC, that was encapsulated in Edicts of Ashoka.
Greek-Jewish clashes at Cyrene in 73 advertising and 117 advertising plus in Alexandria in 115 AD offer samples of cosmopolitan towns as scenes of tumult.
The Romans tolerated most religions, including Judaism and encouraged local subjects to continue worshipping their gods. They couldn't but tolerate Christianity until it had been legalised by the Roman emperor Galerius in 311. The Edict of Milan fully guaranteed freedom of religion inside Roman Empire before Edict of Thessalonica in 380, which outlawed all religions except Christianity.
Following a time period of fighting lasting around a hundred years before 620 advertisement which mainly included Arab and Jewish inhabitants of Medina (then known as Yathrib), religious freedom for Muslims, Jews and pagans had been announced by Muhammad in Constitution of Medina. The Islamic Caliphate later on guaranteed religious freedom in conditions that non-Muslim communities accept dhimmi status and their adult men spend the punitive jizya taxation rather than the zakat compensated by Muslim citizens. Though Dhimmis weren't provided exactly the same political liberties as Muslims, they nonetheless did enjoy equality beneath the rules of property, agreement, and obligation.
Religious pluralism existed in classical Islamic ethics and Sharia, whilst the spiritual legislation and courts of other religions, including Christianity, Judaism and Hinduism, had been usually accommodated in the Islamic legal framework, as observed in the first Caliphate, Al-Andalus, Indian subcontinent, and Ottoman Millet system. In medieval Islamic societies, the qadi (Islamic judges) often could not interfere in matters of non-Muslims unless the events voluntarily choose to be judged in accordance with Islamic law, thus the dhimmi communities residing in Islamic states usually had unique laws separate through the Sharia legislation, for instance the Jews who does have their Halakha courts.
Dhimmis were permitted to run their very own courts following unique legal systems in situations that couldn't involve other religious groups, or money offences or threats to public order. Non-Muslims had been permitted to engage in spiritual techniques that were frequently forbidden by Islamic legislation, for instance the usage of liquor and pork, including religious techniques which Muslims found repugnant, for instance the Zoroastrian training of incestuous «self-marriage» where a person could marry his mother, cousin or child. According to the famous Islamic legal scholar Ibn Qayyim (1292–1350), non-Muslims had the right to engage in such religious practices no matter if it offended Muslims, under the conditions that such instances never be presented to Islamic Sharia courts and that these spiritual minorities thought that the practice under consideration is permissible based on their religion.
Despite Dhimmis enjoying special statuses in Caliphates, these people were maybe not considered equals, and sporadic persecutions of non-Muslim groups did occur in the annals of the Caliphates.
IndiaMain article: Freedom of religion in India
Ancient Jews fleeing from persecution within their homeland 2,500 years ago settled in Asia and not faced anti-Semitism. Freedom of faith edicts have now been discovered written during Ashoka the fantastic's reign in third century BC. Freedom to practise, preach and propagate any faith is a constitutional right in Modern Asia. Many major spiritual festivals for the primary communities are included in the a number of national vacations.
Although India is an 80percent Hindu country, Asia is a secular state without any state religions.
Many scholars and intellectuals believe that Asia's prevalent religion, Hinduism, is definitely a most tolerant faith.Rajni Kothari, founder associated with Centre the Study of Developing Societies has written, "[India] is a country built on the foundations of a civilisation which basically non-religious."
The Dalai Lama, the Tibetan frontrunner in exile, stated that religious tolerance of 'Aryabhoomi,' a mention of the Asia based in the Mahabharata, has been in existence inside nation from thousands of years. «Not only Hinduism, Jainism, Buddhism, Sikhism that are the native religions and Christianity and Islam have actually flourished right here. Spiritual tolerance is inherent in Indian tradition,» the Dalai Lama stated.
Freedom of faith within the Indian subcontinent is exemplified by the reign of King Piyadasi (304–232 BC) (Ashoka). One of King Ashoka's primary issues was to reform government institutes and workout ethical axioms in his try to produce a just and humane culture. Later on he promoted the axioms of Buddhism, additionally the creation of a just, understanding and fair culture happened as an essential concept for several ancient rulers with this amount of time in the East.
The significance of freedom of worship in India was encapsulated in an inscription of Ashoka:
King Piyadasi (Ashok) dear toward Gods, honours all sects, the ascetics (hermits) or people who dwell at home, he honours them with charity as well as in alternative methods. But the King, dear to your Gods, features less importance to this charity and these honours than to the vow of seeing the reign of virtues, which comprises the essential part of them. For all these virtues there is certainly a typical supply, modesty of speech. Frankly, one should never exalt a person's creed discrediting all others, nor must one degrade these others without genuine reasons. One must, quite the opposite, render to many other creeds the honour befitting them.
In the main Asian continent, the Mongols were tolerant of religions. Individuals could worship as they wished easily and openly.
Following the arrival of Europeans, Christians in their zeal to convert regional according to belief in transformation as solution of God, have also been seen to fall into frivolous practices since their arrival, though by and large you can find almost no reports of law and order disruption from mobs with Christian thinking, except maybe in north eastern area of India.
Freedom of religion in contemporary India is a simple right guaranteed in full under Article 25 of nation's constitution. Properly, every citizen of Asia has the right to profess, exercise and propagate their religions peacefully.Vishwa Hindu Parishad counters this argument by saying that evangelical Christians are forcefully (or through money) converting rural, illiterate populations and they're only wanting to stop this.
In September 2010, the Indian state of Kerala's State Election Commissioner announced that «Religious minds cannot issue calls to vote for users of a particular community or to beat the nonbelievers». The Catholic Church comprising Latin, Syro-Malabar and Syro-Malankara rites used to give clear guidelines to your faithful on exercising their franchise during elections through pastoral letters given by bishops or council of bishops. The pastoral letter issued by Kerala Catholic Bishops' Council (KCBC) in the eve for the poll urged the faithful to shun atheists.
Right now, most Indians celebrate all spiritual festivals with equal passion and respect. Hindu festivals like Deepavali and Holi, Muslim festivals like Eid al-Fitr, Eid-Ul-Adha, Muharram, Christian festivals like Christmas alongside festivals like Buddha Purnima, Mahavir Jayanti, Gur Purab etc. are celebrated and enjoyed by all Indians.
Religious intoleranceNineteenth century allegorical statue in the Congress Column in Belgium depicting religious freedom
Most Roman Catholic kingdoms kept a good rein on religious phrase through the entire dark ages. Jews had been alternately tolerated and persecuted, the most notable samples of the latter being the expulsion of all Jews from Spain in 1492. Some of those who stayed and converted had been tried as heretics into the Inquisition for allegedly exercising Judaism in secret. Regardless of the persecution of Jews, these people were the absolute most tolerated non-Catholic faith in European countries.
But the latter was at component a reaction to the growing movement that became the Reformation. As early as 1380, John Wycliffe in England denied transubstantiation and began his interpretation of the Bible into English. He had been condemned in a Papal Bull in 1410, and all sorts of their books were burned.
In 1414, Jan Hus, a Bohemian preacher of reformation, was handed a safe conduct by the Holy Roman Emperor to go to the Council of Constance. Not completely trusting in their safety, he made his will before he left. His forebodings proved accurate, and he had been burned during the stake on 6 July 1415. The Council additionally decreed that Wycliffe's remains be disinterred and cast away. This decree had not been completed until 1429.
After the autumn associated with the town of Granada, Spain, in 1492, the Muslim population had been promised religious freedom by the Treaty of Granada, but that promise ended up being short-lived. In 1501, Granada's Muslims were given an ultimatum to either convert to Christianity or to emigrate. The majority converted, but only superficially, continuing to dress and talk because they had prior to and to secretly exercise Islam. The Moriscos (converts to Christianity) were eventually expelled from Spain between 1609 (Castile) and 1614 (rest of Spain), by Philip III.
Martin Luther published their famous 95 Theses in Wittenberg on 31 October 1517. Their major aim ended up being theological, summed up within the three basic dogmas of Protestantism:
- The Bible just is infallible.
- Every Christian can interpret it.
- Human sins are incredibly wrongful that no deed or merit, only God's grace, can lead to salvation.
In consequence, Luther hoped to avoid the sale of indulgences and also to reform the Church from within. In 1521, he had been provided the chance to recant at Diet of Worms before Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor. After he declined to recant, he had been declared heretic. Partly for his or her own security, he was sequestered on the Wartburg in the belongings of Frederick III, Elector of Saxony, in which he translated this new Testament into German. He had been excommunicated by Papal Bull in 1521.
But the motion proceeded to gain ground in their lack and spread to Switzerland. Huldrych Zwingli preached reform in Zürich from 1520 to 1523. He opposed the sale of indulgences, celibacy, pilgrimages, images, statues, relics, altars, and organs. This culminated in outright war between your Swiss cantons that accepted Protestantism as well as the Catholics. The Catholics had been victorious, and Zwingli ended up being killed in battle in 1531. The Catholic cantons had been magnanimous in success.
The defiance of Papal authority proved contagious, plus in 1533, whenever Henry VIII of England ended up being excommunicated for their divorce and remarriage to Anne Boleyn, he promptly established circumstances church with bishops appointed by the crown. This is maybe not without interior opposition, and Thomas More, who had previously been his Lord Chancellor, was executed in 1535 for opposition to Henry.
In 1535, the Swiss canton of Geneva became Protestant. In 1536, the Bernese imposed the reformation regarding canton of Vaud by conquest. They sacked the cathedral in Lausanne and destroyed all its art and statuary. John Calvin, who had previously been active in Geneva ended up being expelled in 1538 in an electrical fight, but he had been invited in 1540.A U.S. postage stamp commemorating spiritual freedom plus the Flushing Remonstrance
The exact same form of seesaw back and forth between Protestantism and Catholicism had been evident in England when Mary we of England returned that nation briefly to your Catholic fold in 1553 and persecuted Protestants. However, the girl half-sister, Elizabeth I of England was to restore the Church of England in 1558, this time around completely, and started to persecute Catholics again. The King James Bible commissioned by King James we of England and published in 1611 proved a landmark for Protestant worship, with official Catholic kinds of worship being prohibited.
In France, although comfort ended up being made between Protestants and Catholics on Treaty of Saint Germain in 1570, persecution continued, most notably into the Massacre of Saint Bartholomew's Day on 24 August 1572, where a large number of Protestants throughout France were killed. Many years prior to, within «Michelade» of Nîmes in 1567, Protestants had massacred the local Catholic clergy.
Early steps and attempts in the form of toleranceThe cross of this war memorial and a menorah coexist in Oxford, Oxfordshire, England
The Norman Kingdom of Sicily under Roger II was characterized by its multi-ethnic nature and religious threshold. Normans, Jews, Muslim Arabs, Byzantine Greeks, Lombards, and indigenous Sicilians lived in harmony. Rather than exterminate the Muslims of Sicily, Roger II's grandson Emperor Frederick II of Hohenstaufen (1215–1250) allowed them to stay regarding mainland and build mosques. Perhaps not least, he enlisted them in their – Christian – army and even into his individual bodyguards.
Bohemia (present-day Czech Republic) enjoyed religious freedom between 1436 and 1520, and became the most liberal countries regarding the Christian globe throughout that time period. The alleged Basel Compacts of 1436 declared the freedom of religion and peace between Catholics and Utraquists. In 1609 Emperor Rudolf II provided Bohemia greater spiritual liberty along with his page of Majesty. The privileged position associated with the Catholic Church inside Czech kingdom had been securely established following the Battle of White hill in 1620. Slowly freedom of religion in Bohemian lands found an end and Protestants fled or had been expelled from the country. A devout Catholic, Emperor Ferdinand II forcibly converted Austrian and Bohemian Protestants.
Meanwhile, in Germany Philip Melanchthon drafted the Augsburg Confession as a typical confession the Lutherans together with free regions. It was presented to Charles V in 1530.
Into the Holy Roman Empire, Charles V decided to tolerate Lutheranism in 1555 during the Peace of Augsburg. Each state was to just take the religion of its prince, but within those states, there was clearly definitely not religious tolerance. Residents of other faiths could relocate to a more hospitable environment.
In France, through the 1550s, many attempts to get together again Catholics and Protestants and also to establish tolerance failed because the State ended up being too poor to enforce them. It took the triumph of prince Henry IV of France, who'd converted into Protestantism, and his accession on throne, to impose spiritual threshold formalized inside Edict of Nantes in 1598. It would stay in force for over 80 years until its revocation in 1685 by Louis XIV of France. Intolerance remained typical until Louis XVI, whom signed the Edict of Versailles (1787), then the constitutional text of 24 December 1789, granting civilian liberties to Protestants. The French Revolution then abolished state religion together with Declaration for the Rights of Man and of this resident (1789) guarantees freedom of religion, as long as religious tasks do not infringe on general public purchase with techniques harmful to society.
Early regulations and legal guarantees for spiritual freedom
Principality of Transylvania
In 1558, the Transylvanian Diet's Edict of Torda declared free practice of both Catholicism and Lutheranism. Calvinism, but had been forbidden. Calvinism had been included among the accepted religions in 1564. 10 years after the first law, in 1568, the exact same Diet, under the chairmanship of King of Hungary, and Prince of Transylvania John Sigismund Zápolya (John II.), following the training of Ferenc Dávid, the creator associated with Unitarian Church of Transylvania, extended the freedom to all religions, declaring that "It isn't allowed to anybody to intimidate anybody with captivity or expelling for his religion". But was above a religious threshold; it declared the equality of the religions, prohibiting all kinds of functions from authorities or from simple people, which may damage other teams or individuals for their religious values. The emergence in social hierarchy was not influenced by the faith of the individual hence Transylvania had also Catholic and Protestant monarchs, whom all respected the Edict of Torda. Having less state faith had been unique for hundreds of years in Europe. Consequently, the Edict of Torda is considered as the very first legal guarantee of religious freedom in Christian European countries.Declaration, by Ferenc Dávid of Religious and Conscience Freedom in the Diet of Torda in 1568, painting by Aladár Körösfői-Kriesch/>
Act of Religious Tolerance and Freedom of Conscience:His majesty, our Lord, in excatly what way he – together with his realm – legislated in the matter of religion on previous diet plans, in the same matter now, within Diet, reaffirms that in almost every place the preachers shall preach and explain the Gospel each according to their knowledge of it, and if the congregation want it, well. Or even, no one shall compel them for their souls would not be pleased, but they shall be permitted to keep a preacher whoever teaching they approve. Consequently none for the superintendents or other people shall abuse the preachers, no body will be reviled for their religion by anybody, based on the previous statutes, and it's also maybe not allowed that anyone should threaten someone else by imprisonment or by reduction from his post for his training. For faith may be the gift of Jesus and also this originates from hearing, which hearings is by the term of Jesus.— Diet at Torda, 1568 : King John Sigismund
Four religions (Catholicism, Lutheranism, Calvinism, Unitarianism) were named as accepted religions (religo recepta), having their representatives in Transylvanian Diet, whilst the other religions, like the Orthodoxs, Sabbatarians and Anabaptists were tolerated churches (religio tolerata), which suggested they had no power within the legislation generating with no veto rights inside Diet, however they weren't persecuted at all. Thanks to the Edict of Torda, from last decades for the 16th Century Transylvania was the only real invest Europe, in which many religions could live together in harmony and without persecution.
This religious freedom ended but also for some of the religions of Transylvania in 1638. Following this year the Sabbatarians begun to be persecuted, and forced to transform to 1 of accepted religions of Transylvania.
Habsburg guideline in Transylvania
Also the Unitarians (despite to be one of many «accepted religions») grew to become placed under an ever-growing force, which culminated after the Habsburg conquest of Transylvania (1691), additionally after the Habsburg career, the brand new Austrian masters forced in the middle of the 18th century the Hutterite Anabaptists (whom found a safe heaven in 1621 in Transylvania, following the persecution that these were subjected in Austrian provinces and Moravia) to convert to Catholicism or even to migrate overseas, which finally the Anabaptists did, leaving Transylvania and Hungary for Wallachia, than after that to Russia, and finally in the usa.
In the Union of Utrecht (20 January 1579), individual freedom of religion ended up being declared into the fight between the Northern Netherlands and Spain. The Union of Utrecht ended up being an essential step up the establishment of Dutch Republic (from 1581 to 1795). Under Calvinist leadership, holland became probably the most tolerant nation in European countries. It granted asylum to persecuted religious minorities, including the Huguenots, the Dissenters, and also the Jews who was simply expelled from Spain and Portugal. The establishment of a Jewish community in Netherlands and New Amsterdam (present-day nyc) throughout the Dutch Republic is a good example of religious freedom. Whenever New Amsterdam surrendered to the English in 1664, freedom of religion was guaranteed in full within the Articles of Capitulation. It benefitted also the Jews who'd landed on Manhattan Island in 1654, fleeing Portuguese persecution in Brazil. Through the eighteenth century, other Jewish communities had been established at Newport, Rhode Island, Philadelphia, Charleston, Savannah, and Richmond.
Intolerance of dissident forms of Protestantism also continued, as evidenced by the exodus of Pilgrims, whom sought refuge, first in Netherlands, and eventually in the usa, founding Plymouth Colony in Massachusetts in 1620. William Penn, the creator of Philadelphia, had been taking part in an incident which had a profound impact upon future United states regulations and the ones of England. In a vintage instance of jury nullification, the jury refused to convict William Penn of preaching a Quaker sermon, which was unlawful. Although the jury was imprisoned because of their acquittal, they endured by their decision and assisted establish the freedom of faith.
PolandOriginal act associated with Warsaw Confederation 1573. The start of spiritual freedom in Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth
The General Charter of Jewish Liberties referred to as Statute of Kalisz ended up being given by the Duke of better Poland Boleslaus the Pious on 8 September 1264 in Kalisz. The statute served whilst the basis the appropriate place of Jews in Poland and led to the creation of the Yiddish-speaking autonomous Jewish country until 1795. The statute granted exclusive jurisdiction of Jewish courts over Jewish issues and established a different tribunal for issues involving Christians and Jews. In addition, it guaranteed personal liberties and security for Jews including freedom of religion, travel, and trade. The statute ended up being ratified by subsequent Polish Kings: Casimir III of Poland in 1334, Casimir IV of Poland in 1453 and Sigismund we of Poland in 1539. Poland freed Jews from direct royal authority, opening up enormous administrative and financial possibilities to them.
Polish–Lithuanian CommonwealthMain article: Warsaw Confederation
The right to worship easily was a basic right fond of all inhabitants into the future Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth throughout the 15th and very early 16th century, but complete freedom of religion was formally recognized in 1573 through the Warsaw Confederation. Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth kept religious freedom legislation during a period when religious persecution was a regular event within the sleep of Europe.
United StatesSee also: Freedom of faith in United States
Most of the very early colonies had been generally speaking perhaps not tolerant of dissident kinds of worship, with Maryland being one of the exceptions. For instance, Roger Williams found it required to receive a new colony in Rhode Island to escape persecution into the theocratically dominated colony of Massachusetts. The Puritans of this Massachusetts Bay Colony were probably the most active of this brand new England persecutors of Quakers, and also the persecuting spirit was shared by Plymouth Colony additionally the colonies along the Connecticut river. In 1660, perhaps one of the most notable victims for the spiritual intolerance had been English Quaker Mary Dyer, who was hanged in Boston, Massachusetts for over and over repeatedly defying a Puritan legislation banning Quakers from the colony. As one of the four executed Quakers referred to as Boston martyrs, the hanging of Dyer in the Boston gallows marked the beginning of the end associated with the Puritan theocracy and brand new England self-reliance from English guideline, plus in 1661 King Charles II clearly forbade Massachusetts from performing anyone for professing Quakerism. Anti-Catholic belief starred in brand new England with the very first Pilgrim and Puritan settlers. In 1647, Massachusetts passed a law prohibiting any Jesuit Roman Catholic priests from entering territory under Puritan jurisdiction. Any suspected one who could not clear himself would be to be banished through the colony; an extra offense carried a death penalty. The Pilgrims of New England held radical Protestant disapproval of Christmas time. Christmas time observance had been outlawed in Boston in 1659. The ban by the Puritans ended up being revoked in 1681 by an English appointed governor, nevertheless it was not until the mid-19th century that celebrating Christmas became typical into the Boston area.
Freedom of religion was first used as a principle of federal government into the founding of this colony of Maryland, founded by the Catholic Lord Baltimore, in 1634. Fifteen years later (1649), the Maryland Toleration Act, drafted by Lord Baltimore, supplied: «No person or individuals...shall from henceforth be any waies troubled, molested or discountenanced for or according of his or her faith nor in free workout thereof.» The Act permitted freedom of worship for many Trinitarian Christians in Maryland, but sentenced to death whoever denied the divinity of Jesus. The Maryland Toleration Act ended up being repealed through the Cromwellian age aided by the help of Protestant assemblymen and a fresh law barring Catholics from openly exercising their faith had been passed away. In 1657, the Catholic Lord Baltimore regained control after making a deal with all the colony's Protestants, and in 1658 the Act had been once more passed by the colonial construction. This time, it might last a lot more than thirty years, until 1692 whenever, after Maryland's Protestant Revolution of 1689, freedom of religion ended up being once more rescinded. Besides, in 1704, an Act ended up being passed away «to avoid the growth of Popery within Province», preventing Catholics from holding political office. Complete religious toleration wouldn't be restored in Maryland before United states Revolution, whenever Maryland's Charles Carroll of Carrollton finalized the United states Declaration of Independence.
Rhode Island (1636), Connecticut (1636), New Jersey, and Pennsylvania (1682) – started by Protestants Roger Williams, Thomas Hooker, and William Penn, respectively – combined the democratic kind of federal government which have been manufactured by the Puritans and Separatist Congregationalists in Massachusetts with religious freedom. These colonies became sanctuaries for persecuted religious minorities. Catholics and later on Jews also had full citizenship and free exercise of these religions. Williams, Hooker, Penn, and their buddies had been firmly convinced that freedom of conscience had been the might of God. Williams offered probably the most profound argument: As faith may be the free work regarding the Holy Spirit, it may not be forced on you. Consequently, strict separation of church and state needs to be kept. Pennsylvania was the sole colony that retained unlimited spiritual freedom before foundation of united states of america in 1776. It was the inseparable connection between democracy, religious freedom, together with other types of freedom which became the governmental and legal basis of the new nation. In particular, Baptists and Presbyterians demanded the disestablishment of state churches – Anglican and Congregationalist – plus the security of religious freedom.
Reiterating Maryland's together with other colonies' earlier colonial legislation, the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, written in 1779 by Thomas Jefferson, proclaimed:
[N]o man will be compelled to constant or help any spiritual worship, destination, or ministry at all, nor shall be enforced, restrained, molested, or burthened in his human anatomy or items, nor shall otherwise suffer, on account of their religious opinions or belief; but that most men will be absolve to profess, and also by argument to keep up, their viewpoints in matters of religion, and that similar shall in no smart diminish, enlarge, or influence their civil capacities.
Those sentiments also discovered phrase in the First Amendment associated with the national constitution, the main united states of america' Bill of Rights: «Congress shall make no legislation respecting an establishment of faith, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof...»
America formally considers spiritual freedom in its international relations. The International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 established america Commission on Overseas Religious Freedom which investigates the records of over 200 other nations with regards to spiritual freedom, and makes guidelines to submit nations with egregious records to ongoing scrutiny and possible economic sanctions. Many individual legal rights companies have actually advised the usa to be nevertheless more active in imposing sanctions on nations which do not permit or tolerate religious freedom.
CanadaFurther information: Freedom of faith in Canada
Freedom of religion in Canada is a constitutionally protected right, permitting believers the freedom to put together and worship without limitation or disturbance. Canadian law goes further, needing that private residents and organizations offer reasonable accommodation to those, for example, with strong spiritual opinions. The Canadian Human Rights Act enables an exception to reasonable accommodation with regards to spiritual dress, like a Sikh turban, when there is a bona fide work-related requirement, such as a workplace needing a hard cap. In 2017 the Santo Daime Church Céu do Montréal received religious exemption to make use of Ayahuasca as a sacrament within their rituals.
On 25 November 1981, the us General Assembly passed the Declaration in the removal of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief. This declaration recognizes freedom of faith as significant peoples right relative to other instruments of international legislation.
But the most significant binding legal instruments that guarantee the best to freedom of faith which was passed by the worldwide community is the meeting regarding the liberties for the kid which states in its Article 14: «States events shall respect the right regarding the child to freedom of thought, conscience and faith. – States Parties shall respect the rights and duties of this moms and dads and, whenever relevant, appropriate guardians, to provide way toward son or daughter in exercise of their right in a way consistent with the evolving capacities of this youngster. – Freedom to manifest one's faith or opinions might topic and then such limits as are prescribed by law and are also necessary to protect general public security, order, health or morals, and/or fundamental liberties and freedoms of other people.»
Theistic, non-theistic and atheistic beliefs
In 1993, the UN's individual rights committee declared that article 18 associated with Overseas Covenant on Civil and Political Rights «protects theistic, non-theistic and atheistic thinking, as well as the right to not profess any religion or belief.» The committee further stated that «the freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief always involves the freedom to choose a religion or belief, like the straight to change your current faith or belief with another or even to adopt atheistic views.» Signatories toward meeting are barred from «the usage of threat of physical force or penal sanctions to compel believers or non-believers» to recant their values or transform. Despite this, minority religions still are persecuted in many elements of the entire world.
Liberal secularAdam Smith argued in favour of freedom of religion.
The French philosopher Voltaire noted in his book on English culture, Letters regarding the English, that freedom of faith in a diverse culture was deeply important to keeping comfort for the reason that nation. It was also important in understanding why England in those days ended up being more prosperous compared to the united states's less religiously tolerant European neighbours.
If one religion only were allowed in England, the us government would really perhaps become arbitrary; if there were but two, the individuals would cut one another’s throats; but as you will find such a large number, all of them live pleased plus in comfort.
Adam Smith, in his book The riches of Nations (using a disagreement first submit by their buddy and contemporary David Hume), states that eventually it really is inside desires of culture in general and civil magistrate (federal government) in particular allowing individuals to freely choose unique faith, since it helps prevent civil unrest and reduces intolerance. So long as there are enough various religions and/or religious sects running easily in a society they are typical compelled to moderate their more controversial and violent teachings, so as to be much more attractive to more individuals so have a simpler time attracting brand new converts. It really is this free competition amongst religious sects for converts that ensures stability and tranquillity in the long run.
Smith additionally points out that legislation that counter spiritual freedom and look for to preserve the energy and belief in a certain faith will, in the long run, just serve to damage and corrupt that faith, as the leaders and preachers become complacent, disconnected and unpractised within their capability to look for and win over brand new converts:
The interested and active zeal of spiritual teachers could be dangerous and troublesome only where there clearly was either but one sect tolerated in society, or where in actuality the entire of a sizable culture is split into several great sects; the instructors of every acting by concert, and under an everyday control and subordination. But that zeal should be completely innocent, in which the society is split into two or three hundred, or, perhaps, into as numerous thousand tiny sects, that no body might be considerable enough to disturb the general public tranquillity. The instructors of each sect, seeing on their own surrounded on all sides with more adversaries than buddies, could be obliged to learn that candour and moderation which are so seldom to be found one of the instructors of these great sects.
Hinduism is one of the more broad-minded religions in terms of religious freedom. It respects the proper of everybody to attain God in their own means. Hindus believe in other ways to preach attainment of God and faith as a philosophy and hence respect all religions as equal. One of the famous Hindu sayings about faith is: «Truth is one; sages call it by various names.»
JudaismWomen detained at Western Wall for using prayer shawls; photo from ladies for the Wall
Judaism includes multiple streams, such as Orthodox, Reform Judaism, Conservative Judaism, Reconstructionist Judaism, Jewish Renewal and Humanistic Judaism. However, Judaism additionally exists in lots of types as a civilization, possessing characteristics known as peoplehood, in place of strictly as a religion. Into the Torah, Jews are forbidden to apply idolatry and they are commanded to root away pagan and idolatrous methods of their midst, including killing idolaters whom lose kids for their gods, or take part in immoral activities. But these rules aren't adhered to anymore as Jews have usually lived among a multi-religious community.
Following the conquest of the Kingdoms of Israel and Judea by the Roman Empire, a Jewish state couldn't exist until 1948 utilizing the establishment of the State of Israel. For over 1500 years Jewish individuals lived under pagan, Christian, Muslim, etc. guideline. Therefore Jewish individuals in a few of these states encountered persecution. From pogroms in European countries throughout the dark ages to your establishment of segregated Jewish ghettos during World War II. At the center East, Jews were categorised as dhimmi, non- Muslims allowed to reside within a Muslim state. Despite the fact that offered legal rights within a Muslim state, a dhimmi remains perhaps not equal to a Muslim within Muslim society, the same way non-Jewish Israeli citizens aren't equal with Jewish residents in modern-day Israel.
Possibly as a result of this reputation for long term persecution, Jews in modernity have now been being among the most active proponents of religious freedom in the usa and abroad and also launched and supported anti-hate organizations, including the Anti-Defamation League, the Southern Poverty Law Center and United states Civil Liberties Union. Jews are very active in supporting Muslim alongside religious groups in the US against discrimination and hate crimes and a lot of Jewish congregations throughout the US and many individual Jews be involved in interfaith community jobs and programs.
Hawaii of Israel ended up being founded for the Jewish diaspora after World War II. Whilst the Israel Declaration of Independence stresses spiritual freedom as a fundamental principle, used the existing government, dominated by the ultra-Orthodox section associated with population has instituted legal barriers for people who cannot practice Orthodox Judaism as Jews. But as a nation state, Israel is very open towards other religions and religious methods, including public Muslim call to prayer chants and Christian prayer bells ringing in Jerusalem. Israel happens to be evaluated in research by the Pew organization as having «high» federal government limitations on faith. The us government recognizes only Orthodox Judaism in certain things of personal status, and marriages can just only be performed by religious authorities. The government provides the best financing to Orthodox Judaism, despite the fact that adherents represent a minority of residents. Jewish females, including Anat Hoffman, happen arrested at the Western Wall for praying and performing while putting on religious clothes the Orthodox feel should be reserved for guys. Ladies for the Wall have organized to market spiritual freedom within Wall. In November 2014, a small grouping of 60 non-Orthodox rabbinical pupils had been told they'd never be permitted to pray within the Knesset synagogue since it is reserved for Orthodox. Rabbi Joel Levy, director for the Conservative Yeshiva in Jerusalem, stated that he had submitted the demand for the students and saw their shock if the request was denied. He noted: «paradoxically, this decision served as a proper end to our discussion about faith and state in Israel.» MK Dov Lipman expressed the concern that lots of Knesset employees are not really acquainted with non-Orthodox and United states methods and would view «an egalitarian solution within the synagogue as an affront.» The non-Orthodox types of Jewish practice function individually in Israel, with the exception of these problems of praying at the Western Wall.
Christianityarea of the Oscar Straus Memorial in Washington, D.C. honoring the proper to worship
According on Catholic Church within the Vatican II document on spiritual freedom, Dignitatis Humanae, «the peoples person has the right to religious freedom», which is called «immunity from coercion in civil society». This concept of spiritual freedom «leaves untouched traditional Catholic doctrine regarding the ethical responsibility of men and communities toward the real religion.» Also, this right «is to be recognized within the constitutional legislation whereby culture is governed and therefore it's to become a civil right.»
Before this, Pope Pius IX wrote a document called the Syllabus of Errors. The Syllabus was comprised of phrases and paraphrases from earlier in the day papal papers, along with index sources in their mind, and delivered as a list of «condemned propositions». It doesn't explain why each particular proposition is wrong, nonetheless it cites early in the day documents that your reader can refer for the Pope's reasons for saying each idea is false. One of the statements within the Syllabus are: "[It is one to express that] Every man is absolve to embrace and profess that faith which, led by the light of explanation, he shall give consideration to true" (15); "[It is one to express that] in our day it really is not expedient your Catholic faith must certanly be held while the only faith for the State, toward exclusion of all other designs of worship"; "[It is an error to state that] ergo it's been sensibly decided for legal reasons, in certain Catholic countries, that individuals coming to live therein shall benefit from the general public exercise of these very own peculiar worship".
Some Orthodox Christians, especially those surviving in democratic nations, help religious freedom for all, as evidenced by the career for the Ecumenical Patriarchate. Many Protestant Christian churches, including some Baptists, Churches of Christ, Seventh-day Adventist Church and main line churches have actually a commitment to religious freedoms. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints also affirms spiritual freedom.
Nonetheless others, such as for example African scholar Makau Mutua, have argued that Christian insistence on the propagation of their faith to native countries as some religious freedom has led to a corresponding denial of spiritual freedom to native traditions and generated their destruction. As he states in book produced by the Oslo Coalition on Freedom of Religion or Belief, «Imperial religions have actually always violated specific conscience therefore the public expressions of Africans and their communities by subverting African religions.»
Inside their guide Breaking Asia, Rajiv Malhotra and Aravindan Neelakandan talked about the «US Church» funding activities in Asia, such as the popularly advertised campaigns to «save» bad kiddies by feeding, clothing, and educating them, utilizing the guide arguing that the funds gathered were getting used not really much for the purposes indicated to sponsors, however for indoctrination and conversion tasks. They suggest that Asia may be the prime target of a massive enterprise – a «network» of organizations, individuals, and churches – that, they argue, seem extremely specialized in the duty of making a separatist identity, history, as well as religion the vulnerable parts of Asia. They declare that this nexus of players includes not just church teams, regulators, and associated organizations, but additionally personal think tanks and academics.
Joel Spring has discussing the Christianization associated with the Roman Empire:
Christianity included new impetus toward expansion of empire. Increasing the arrogance associated with the imperial project, Christians insisted your Gospels while the Church had been the actual only real legitimate sources of religious beliefs. Imperialists could claim that these people were both civilizing the planet and distributing the real religion. By the fifth century, Christianity had been regarded as co-extensive aided by the Imperium romanum. This implied that to be human, in place of being an all natural slave, was to be «civilized» and Christian. Historian Anthony Pagden contends, «just since the civitas; had now become coterminous with Christianity, therefore to be individual – to be, which, person who was 'civil', and who was simply capable interpret properly what the law states of nature – one had now and also to be Christian.» Following the fifteenth century, most Western colonialists rationalized the spread of kingdom using the belief which they had been saving a barbaric and pagan globe by spreading Christian civilization.
IslamSee additionally: human being legal rights in Islamic countries, Human rights at the center East, Application of sharia law by country, Islamism, and governmental aspects of IslamFurther information: Marrakesh Declaration
Conversion to Islam is simple, but Muslims are forbidden to transform from Islam to a different religion. Particular Muslim-majority nations are known for their restrictions on religious freedom, very favoring Muslim citizens over non-Muslim citizens. Other countries getting the same restrictive rules tend to be liberal when imposing them. Even other Muslim-majority nations are secular and therefore cannot manage religious belief.
Islamic theologians quote the Qur'an («There is no compulsion in religion»[2:256] and «Say: O you who reject faith, i really do maybe not worship what you worship, nor can you worship the things I worship...To you be your religion, also to me personally be mine»[109:1–6], i.e., Sura Al-Kafirun) to show scriptural support for religious freedom.
Quran 2:190–194, discussing the war against Pagans through the Battle of Badr in Medina, suggests that Muslims are just allowed to combat those that plan to damage them (right of self-defense) and that if their enemies surrender, they must additionally stop because Jesus cannot like people who transgress limits.
In Bukhari:V9 N316, Jabir ibn 'Abdullah narrated that a Bedouin accepted Islam and when he got a temperature he demanded that Muhammad to cancel his pledge (allow him to renounce Islam). Muhammad refused to do so. The Bedouin man repeated his demand once, but Muhammad once again refused. Then, he (the Bedouin) left Medina. Muhammad said, «Madinah is like a set of bellows (furnace): it expels its impurities and brightens and clear its good.» In this narration, there is no proof showing that Muhammad ordered the execution of the Bedouin for planning to renounce Islam.
Additionally, Quran 5:3, which can be thought to be Jesus's last revelation to Muhammad, states that Muslims are to worry Jesus and never those that reject Islam, and Quran 53:38–39 states that certain is accountable just for an individual's very own actions. Consequently, it postulates that in Islam, within the things of practising a religion, it doesn't relate genuinely to a worldly punishment, but alternatively these actions are accountable to Jesus in afterlife. Therefore, this supports the argument contrary to the execution of apostates in Islam.
However, on the other hand, some Muslims offer the training of executing apostates who leave Islam, like in Bukhari:V4 B52 N260; «The Prophet stated, 'If a Muslim discards his faith and separates through the main human body of Muslims, destroy him.However, many Muslims believe this hadith was written into the context of war and therefore Prophet Muhammad stipulated that whichever Muslim rejects his faith, leaves from the primary human body of Muslims and betrays the Muslims in war must certanly be executed as a punishment for his treachery towards the city of Muslims. Many Muslims believe that this hadith talks about the punishment of Treason.
In Iran, the constitution recognizes four religions whoever status is formally protected: Zoroastrianism, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.The constitution, but also set the groundwork the institutionalized persecution of Bahá'ís,who happen afflicted by arrests, beatings, executions, confiscation and destruction of property, together with denial of civil rights and liberties, plus the denial of use of higher education. There isn't any freedom of conscience in Iran, as transforming from Islam to virtually any other religion is forbidden.
In Egypt, a 16 December 2006 judgment for the Supreme Administrative Council created a definite demarcation between respected religions – Islam, Christianity and Judaism – and all other spiritual beliefs; no other spiritual affiliation is formally admissible. The ruling renders users of other religious communities, including Bahá'ís, without the capability to obtain the necessary government documents to possess legal rights inside their nation, basically doubting them of most legal rights of citizenship. They can't obtain ID cards, birth certificates, death certificates, marriage or divorce or separation certificates, and passports; additionally they cannot be used, educated, treated in public areas hospitals or vote, among other activities. See Egyptian recognition card debate.
Changing religionMain article: Religious conversion
Among the absolute most contentious regions of spiritual freedom is the right of someone to change or abandon their very own religion (apostasy), and right to evangelize individuals seeking to convince other people to create such a change.
Other debates have actually focused around limiting certain types of missionary task by religions. Numerous Islamic states, yet others such as Asia, severely restrict missionary activities of other religions. Greece, among europe, has generally appeared unfavorably on missionary activities of denominations other people compared to the majority church and proselytizing is constitutionally forbidden.
A different sort of kind of review for the freedom to propagate faith has come from non-Abrahamic traditions including the African and Indian. African scholar Makau Mutua criticizes spiritual evangelism on a lawn of cultural annihilation by what he calls „proselytizing universalist faiths“ (Chapter 28: Proselytism and Cultural Integrity, p. 652):
...the (human) liberties regime incorrectly assumes a level playing industry by needing that African religions compete available on the market of tips. The liberties corpus not merely forcibly imposes on African religions the responsibility to compete – a task that as nonproselytizing, noncompetitive creeds they're not historically fashioned – and protects the evangelizing religions inside their march towards universalization… it seems inconceivable your human legal rights regime could have meant to protect the proper of specific religions to destroy other people.
Some Indian scholars have likewise argued your straight to propagate religion is not culturally or religiously basic.
In Sri Lanka, there were debates regarding a bill on spiritual freedom that seeks to safeguard native religious traditions from specific types of missionary activities. Debates have also happened in several states of Asia regarding comparable laws, particularly those who restrict conversions making use of force, fraud or allurement.
In 2008, Christian Solidarity Worldwide, a Christian peoples liberties non-governmental organisation which specializes in religious freedom, launched an in-depth report regarding peoples rights abuses faced by people who leave Islam for another faith. The report could be the product of annually long scientific study in six different countries. It calls on Muslim countries, the worldwide community, the UN additionally the worldwide media to resolutely deal with the severe violations of peoples liberties experienced by apostates.
Apostasy in IslamMain articles: Apostasy in Islam, Takfir, and Mutaween/> appropriate opinion on apostasy by the Fatwa committee at Al-Azhar University in Cairo, the greatest Islamic organization on earth, regarding the instance of a person who changed into Christianity: „Since he left Islam, he'll be invited to express their regret. If he does not regret, he will be killed pertaining to liberties and obligations of Islamic law.“
In Islam, apostasy is called „ridda“ (»turning back") and is regarded as a profound insult to Jesus. Someone created of Muslim parents that rejects Islam is known as a "murtad fitri" (normal apostate), and a person that converted to Islam and soon after rejects the faith is named a "murtad milli" (apostate from the community).
In Islamic law (Sharia), the opinion view is that a male apostate must certanly be placed to death unless he is suffering from a psychological disorder or transformed under duress, including, because of an imminent risk of being killed. A female apostate must be either performed, according to Shafi'i, Maliki, and Hanbali schools of Sunni Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh), or imprisoned until she reverts to Islam as advocated by the Sunni Hanafi college and by Shi'a scholars.
Preferably, the main one performing the execution of an apostate must be an imam. At exactly the same time, all schools of Islamic jurisprudence agree that any Muslim can kill an apostate without punishment.
However, while most scholars agree in regards to the punishment, numerous disagree on the allowable time and energy to retract the apostasy. Numerous scholars push this as far as allowing the apostate until she or he dies, making the death penalty more of a theoretical statement/exercise. S. A. Rahman, a former Chief Justice of Pakistan, contends that there is no indicator for the death penalty for apostasy in Qur'an.
Religious training may also conflict with secular law, producing debates on religious freedom. For example, despite the fact that polygamy is permitted in Islam, it really is prohibited in secular legislation in many nations. This raises the question of whether prohibiting the training infringes on the philosophy of particular Muslims. The united states and Asia, both constitutionally secular countries, took two different views of the. In Asia, polygamy is permitted, but only for Muslims, under Muslim Personal Law. In america, polygamy is forbidden for all. This is an important source of conflict between your very early LDS Church additionally the united states of america until the Church amended its place on exercising polygamy.
Comparable problems also have arisen in the context regarding the religious usage of psychedelic substances by Native United states tribes in america as well as other Native techniques.
In 1955, Chief Justice of Ca Roger J. Traynor neatly summarized the United states position on what freedom of religion cannot imply freedom from legislation: «Although freedom of conscience plus the freedom to think are absolute, the freedom to do something just isn't.» However with respect to the religious usage of pets within secular law and those acts, the united states Supreme Court choice in the case of the Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah in 1993 upheld the right of Santeria adherents to practice ritual animal sacrifice, with Justice Anthony Kennedy saying within the choice: «religious opinions do not need to be appropriate, rational, consistent or comprehensible to other people so that you can merit First Amendment protection» (quoted by Justice Kennedy through the viewpoint by Justice Burger in Thomas v. Review Board associated with the Indiana Employment Security Division 450 U.S. 707 (1981)).
In 2015, Kim Davis, a Kentucky county clerk, refused to abide by the Supreme Court choice in Obergefell v. Hodges legalizing Same-sex marriage in the us. Whenever she refused to issue marriage licenses, she became embroiled in Miller v. Davis lawsuit. Her actions caused lawyer and author Roberta Kaplan to state that «Kim Davis is the clearest example of someone who desires to utilize a religious liberty argument to discriminate.»
In 1962, the truth of Engele v. Vitale visited court within the violation regarding the Establishment Clause regarding the very first Amendment resulting from a mandatory nondenominational prayer in New York public schools. The Supreme Court ruled in opposition to their state.
In 1963, the Supreme Court ruled in the situation of Abington School District v. Schempp. Edward Schempp sued the institution district in Abington over the Pennsylvania law which required pupils to hear and sometimes browse portions associated with the bible with regards to their daily training. The court ruled in favor of Schempp therefore the Pennsylvania legislation ended up being overturned.
In 1968, the Supreme Court ruled on the case of Epperson v. Arkansas. Susan Epperson, a high college instructor in Arkansas sued over a violation of religious freedom. Their state had a law banning the teaching of evolution plus the school Epperson struggled to obtain had provided curriculum which included evolutionary concept. Epperson must choose between violating regulations or losing her task. The Supreme Court ruled to overturn the Arkansas law as it was unconstitutional.
Youngsters' legal rights
what the law states in Germany offers the term of «religious majority» (Religiöse Mündigkeit) with the absolute minimum age for minors to adhere to their own religious values no matter if their parents don't share those or cannot approve. Kiddies 14 and older have the unrestricted straight to enter or leave any spiritual community. Children 12 and older cannot be compelled to alter to another belief. Kids 10 and older have to be heard before their moms and dads change their religious upbringing to some other belief. You can find comparable rules in Austria as well as in Switzerland.
International Religious Freedom Day
27 October is International Religious Freedom Day, in commemoration associated with execution for the Boston martyrs, a small grouping of Quakers executed by the Puritans on Boston popular because of their religious opinions underneath the legislature associated with the Massachusetts Bay Colony between 1659–1661. The united states proclaimed 16 January Religious Freedom Day.
In its 2011 annual report, the usa Commission on Global Religious Freedom designated fourteen countries as «countries of specific concern». The payment president commented why these are nations whoever conduct marks them because the earth's worst religious freedom violators and human being legal rights abusers. The fourteen nations designated had been Burma, Asia, Egypt, Eritrea, Iran, Iraq, Nigeria, North Korea, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Vietnam. Other nations regarding payment's watchlist include Afghanistan, Belarus, Cuba, Asia, Indonesia, Laos, Russia, Somalia, Tajikistan, Turkey, and Venezuela.
You can find concerns about the restrictions on public religious dress in some europe (like the Hijab, Kippah, and Christian cross). Article 18 of the UN Overseas Covenant on Civil and Political Rights limits limitations on freedom to manifest a person's religion or opinions to those essential to protect public security, purchase, health, or morals or the fundamental rights and freedoms of other people. Freedom of religion as a legal concept is related to, not identical with, spiritual toleration, separation of church and state, or secular state (laïcité).
Social hostilities and federal government restrictionsFreedom of religion by nation (Pew analysis Center research, 2009). Light yellow: low restriction; red: quite high restriction on freedom of religion.
The Pew analysis Center has performed studies on worldwide spiritual freedom between 2009 and 2015, compiling worldwide information from 16 governmental and non-governmental organizations–including the us, america state dept., and Human Rights Watch–and representing over 99.5 % worldwide's populace. During 2009, almost 70 % of the world's population lived in countries categorized as having hefty restrictions on freedom of religion. This concerns restrictions on religion originating from federal government prohibitions on free speech and religious expression and social hostilities undertaken by personal people, organisations and social groups. Personal hostilities were categorized by the level of public physical violence and religion-related terrorism.
Many nations given to the protection of spiritual freedom inside their constitutions or guidelines, only 25 % of these countries were found to totally respect these rights in practice. In 75 countries governments limit the efforts of spiritual groups to proselytise as well as in 178 nations religious groups must register because of the government. In 2013, Pew classified 30% of nations as having limitations that have a tendency to target religious minorities, and 61% of nations have actually social hostilities that have a tendency to target spiritual minorities.
The countries in North and South America reportedly had a few of the lowest levels of government and social limitations on religion, while The Middle East and North Africa had been the areas utilizing the greatest. Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Iran were the nations that top the list of countries with all the overall highest degrees of restriction on religion. Topping the Pew government limitations index were Saudi Arabia, Iran, Uzbekistan, Asia, Egypt, Burma, Maldives, Eritrea, Malaysia and Brunei.
Of the world's 25 many populous countries, Iran, Egypt, Indonesia and Pakistan had the absolute most limitations, while Brazil, Japan, Italy, Southern Africa, the UK, as well as the US had some of the cheapest amounts, as measured by Pew.
Vietnam and Asia were classified as having high government restrictions on faith but were into the moderate or low range when it found social hostilities. Nigeria, Bangladesh and India had been full of social hostilities but moderate with regards to government actions.
Limitations on religion around the globe increased between mid-2009 and mid-2010, in accordance with a 2012 research by the Pew Research Center. Limitations in each of the five major parts of the entire world increased—including into the Americas and sub-Saharan Africa, the 2 regions in which overall limitations previously have been declining. In 2010, Egypt, Nigeria, the Palestinian territories, Russia, and Yemen were added to the «very high» sounding social hostilities. The five greatest social hostility scores were for Pakistan, Asia, Sri Lanka, Iraq, and Bangladesh. In 2015, Pew published that social hostilities declined in 2013, however the harassment of Jews increased.
- Cognitive liberty
- Edict of toleration
- Freedom of thought
- International Association for Religious Freedom
- International Center for Law and Religion Studies
- International Coalition for Religious Freedom
- International Religious Liberty Association
- North American Religious Liberty Association
- Religious conversion
- Religious discrimination
- Religious freedom bill
- Status of spiritual freedom by country
- Religious education in primary and additional training
- ^ «The Universal Declaration of Human Rights». The Us.
- ^ Davis, Derek H. «The Evolution of Religious Liberty as a Universal Human Right». Archived through the original on 1 February 2008. Retrieved 5 December 2006./>
- ^ Congressional Record #29734 – 19 November 2003. Google Books. Retrieved 3 September 2011./>
- ^ Cyrus Cylinder, livius.org.
- ^ Richard A. Taylor; E. Ray Clendenen (15 October 2004). Haggai, Malachi. B&H Publishing Group. pp. 31–32. ISBN 978-0-8054-0121-9./>
- ^ Njeuma, Martin Z. (2012). Fulani Hegemony in Yola (Old Adamawa) 1809-1902. African Books Collective. p. 82. ISBN 978-9956-726-95-0. Of all the various kinds of taxation known to Islamic communities, it appears just two – the zakat and also the jixya were worth focusing on in Adamawa. [...] The jizya had been the levy on non-Muslim individuals who surrendered to Islam and received the status dhimmi/>
- ^ H. Patrick Glenn, Legal Traditions of the World. Oxford University Press, 2007, p. 219.
- ^ The French scholar Gustave Le Bon (the author of Los Angeles civilisation des Arabes) writes «that even though the incidence of taxation dropped more heavily on a Muslim than a non-Muslim, the non-Muslim was free to enjoy similarly well with every Muslim all privileges afforded to the citizens of this state. The sole privilege that has been reserved the Muslims ended up being the seat of this caliphate, which, because of certain religious functions attached to it, which could not obviously be discharged by a non-Muslim.» Mun'im Sirry (2014), Scriptural Polemics: The Qur'an as well as other Religions, p.179. Oxford University Press. />ISBN 978-0199359363.
- ^ Abou El Fadl, Khaled (2007). The Great Theft: Wrestling Islam through the Extremists. HarperOne. p. 204. ISBN 978-0061189036. In accordance the dhimma status system, non-Muslims must spend a poll tax in return for Muslim protection and the privilege of living in Muslim territory. Per this method, non-Muslims are exempt from army solution, however they are excluded from occupying high positions that involve working with high state passions, like being the president or prime minister for the country. In Islamic history, non-Muslims did occupy high roles, particularly in matters that pertaining to fiscal policies or taxation collection./>
- ^ Weeramantry, C. G. (1997). Justice Without Frontiers: Furthering individual rights. Amount 1. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. p. 138. ISBN 90-411-0241-8./>
- ^ Sachedina, Abdulaziz Abdulhussein (2001). The Islamic Roots of Democratic Pluralism. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-513991-7./>
- ^ Mark R. Cohen (1995). Under Crescent and Cross: The Jews in the Middle Ages. Princeton University Press. p. 74. ISBN 0-691-01082-X. Retrieved 10 April 2010./>
- ^ al-Qattan, Najwa (1999). «Dhimmis in Muslim Court: Legal Autonomy and Religious Discrimination». Global Journal of Middle East Studies. University of Cambridge. 31 (3): 429–44. doi:10.1017/S0020743800055501. ISSN 0020-7438./>
- ^ Sherman A. Jackson (2005). Islam and also the Blackamerican: searching toward the 3rd resurrection. Oxford University Press. p. 144. ISBN 0-19-518081-X. Retrieved 10 April 2010./>
- ^ A Shameful Act: The Armenian Genocide together with Question of Turkish duty />ISBN 0-8050-7932-7
- ^ Granada by Richard Gottheil, Meyer Kayserling, Jewish Encyclopedia. 1906 ed.
- ^ «The Jews of Morocco»./>
- ^ That are the Jews of India? – The S. Mark Taper Foundation imprint in Jewish studies. University of California Press. 2000. p. 26. />ISBN 978-0-520-21323-4. https://books.google.com/books?id=ZWX6pF2PTJwC&pg=PA26.; «whenever Portuguese arrived in 1498, they brought a spirit of intolerance utterly alien to India. They soon established an Office of Inquisition at Goa, as well as their hands Indian Jews experienced truly the only example of anti-Semitism ever to occur in Indian soil.»
- ^ David E. Ludden (1996). Contesting the Nation: Religion, Community, and Politics of Democracy in India. University of Pennsylvania Press. pp. 257–58. ISBN 0-8122-1585-0./>
- ^ Rajni Kothari (1998). Communalism in Indian Politics. Rainbow Publishers. p. 134. ISBN 978-81-86962-00-8./>
- ^ «India's religious threshold lauded». Deccan Herald. Retrieved 3 September 2011./>
- ^ «Christian Persecution in Asia: The Actual Story». Stephen-knapp.com. Retrieved 3 September 2011./>
- ^ «The Constitution of India» (PDF). Archived from original (PDF) on 9 September 2014. Retrieved 3 September 2011./>
- ^ a b "'Using places of worship for campaigning in Kerala civic polls is breach of poll rule'". Indian Orthodox Herald. 18 September 2010. Retrieved 3 September 2011./>
- ^ «Roger II». Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived through the original on 23 might 2007. Retrieved 3 September 2011./>
- ^ «Tracing The Norman Rulers of Sicily». Ny Occasions. 26 April 1987. Retrieved 3 September 2011./>
- ^ Christopher Gravett (15 November 1997). German Medieval Armies 1000–1300. Osprey Publishing. p. 17. ISBN 978-1-85532-657-6./>
- ^ Thomas Curtis Van Cleveis the Emperor Frederick II of Hohenstaufen: Immutator Mundi (Oxford, 1972)
- ^ reputation for Transylvania. Volume I. Through the Beginnings to 1606. Hungarian analysis Institute of Canada and A Research Ancillary associated with University of Toronto. ISBN 0-88033-479-7. Retrieved 20 November 2016./>
- ^ Reputation for Transylvania. Amount I. from Beginnings to 1606. Hungarian analysis Institute of Canada and an investigation Ancillary of the University of Toronto. ISBN 0-88033-479-7. Retrieved 20 November 2016./>
- ^ «Destination Romania/Unitarianism, a religion created in Cluj „ Romanian National Information Agency (27 Aug 2014)
- ^ “The Story of Francis David and King John Sigismund: The Establishment of this Transylvanian Unitarian Church». Lightbringers. Retrieved 17 October 2016./>
- ^ Unitarian Universalist Partner Church Council. «Edict of Torda» (DOC). Retrieved on 2008-01-23.
- ^ «Kovács Kálmán: Erdély és a Habsburg valláspolitika a 17. század utolsó évtizedeiben» Mult-Kor (25 November 2005)
- ^ reputation for Transylvania. Amount II. From 1606 to 1830. Hungarian Research Institute of Canada and an investigation Ancillary for the University of Toronto. ISBN 0-88033-491-6. Retrieved 20 November 2016./>
- ^ Reputation for Transylvania. Volume II. From 1606 to 1830. Hungarian Research Institute of Canada and A Research Ancillary of this University of Toronto. ISBN 0-88033-491-6. Retrieved 20 November 2016./>
- ^ «Hutterite History Overview». Hutterian Brethren./>
- ^ Karl Heussi, Kompendium der Kirchengeschichte, 11. Auflage (1956), Tübingen (Germany), pp. 396–97
- ^ Clifton E. Olmstead (1960), reputation for Religion in the us, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Ciffs, N.J., p. 124
- ^ Sinkoff, Nancy (2003). From the Shtetl: Making Jews contemporary within the Polish Borderlands. Community of Biblical Lit. p. 18. ISBN 978-1-930675-16-2./>
- ^ Zamoyski, Adam. The Polish Means. New York: Hippocrene Books, 1987.
- ^ a b Rogers, Horatio, 2009. Mary Dyer of Rhode Island: The Quaker Martyr That Was Hanged on Boston typical, 1 June 1660 pp. 1–2. BiblioBazaar, LLC.
- ^ Puritans and Puritanism in Europe and America: an extensive encyclopedia. Bing Books. Retrieved 3 September 2011./>
- ^ «America's dark and not-very-distant history of hating Catholics». The Guardian. 14 June 2016./>
- ^ Pat, Perrin (1 January 1970). Crime and Punishment: The Colonial Period towards the brand new Frontier. Discovery Enterprises. p. 24./>
- ^ Mahoney, Kathleen A. (10 September 2003). Catholic degree in Protestant America: The Jesuits and Harvard in Age of the University. Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 47./>
- ^ Barnett, James Harwood (1984). The US Christmas: A Study in National Heritage. Ayer Publishing. p. 3. ISBN 0-405-07671-1./>
- ^ Schnepper, Rachel N. (14 December 2012). «Yuletide's Outlaws». The Latest York Circumstances. Retrieved 15 December 2012. From 1659 to 1681, anyone caught celebrating xmas in colony is fined five shillings. .../>
- ^ Marling, Karal Ann (2000). Merry Xmas!: Celebrating America's Greatest Holiday. Harvard University Press. p. 44. ISBN 0-674-00318-7./>
- ^ a b Zimmerman, Mark, icon of suffering Freedom, p. 19, Columbia Magazine, March 2010.
- ^ Brugger, Robert J. (1988). Maryland: A Middle Temperament. p 21, Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press. />ISBN 0-8018-3399-X.
- ^ Finkelman, Paul, Maryland Toleration Act, The Encyclopedia of American Civil Liberties, New York: CRC Press. />ISBN 0-415-94342-6.
- ^ a b Roark, Elisabeth Louise. Artists of Colonial America. p. 78./> Retrieved 22 February 2010
- ^ Christopher Fennell (1998), Plymouth Colony Legal Structure <http://www.histarch.uiuc.edu/plymouth/ccflaw.html>
- ^ Hanover Historical Texts Project <http://history.hanover.edu/texts/masslib.html>
- ^ M. Schmidt, Pilgerväter, in Die Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart, 3. Auflage, Tübingen (Germany), Band V (1961), col. 384
- ^ M. Schmidt, Hooker, Thomas, in Die Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart, 3. Auflage, Band III (1959), col. 449
- ^ Clifton E. Olmstead (1960), History of Religion in america, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., pp. 74–75, 99, 102–05, 113–15
- ^ Edwin S. Gaustad (1999), Liberty of Conscience: Roger Williams in the us, Judson Press, Valley Forge
- ^ Hans Fantel (1974), William Penn: Apostel of Dissent, William Morrow & Co., New York, N.Y.
- ^ Heinrich Bornkamm, Toleranz. In der Geschichte der Christenheit, in Die Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart, 3. Auflage, Band VI (1962), col. 943
- ^ Robert Middlekauff (2005), The Glorious Cause: The United states Revolution, 1763–1789, Revised and Expanded Edition, Oxford University Press, />ISBN 978-0-19-531588-2, p. 635
- ^ Freedom of Religion and Religious Symbols within the Public Sphere. 2.2.2 Headcoverings. Parliament of Canada. Publication No. 2011-60-E. Published 2011-07-25. Retrieved 21 December 2011.
- ^ Rochester, Rev Dr Jessica (17 July 2017). «How Our Santo Daime Church Received Religious Exemption to Use Ayahuasca in Canada». Chacruna. Retrieved 25 March 2019./>
- ^ «A/RES/36/55. Declaration in the Elimination of all of the Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination centered on Religion or Belief». Us. 25 November 1981. Retrieved 3 September 2011./>
- ^ «Religious Rights – Overseas Legal Instruments». Unesco.org. 19 November 2015. Retrieved 6 December 2018./>
- ^ «CCPR General Comment 22: 30/07/93 on ICCPR Article 18». Minorityrights.org./>
- ^ Overseas Federation for Human Rights (1 August 2003). «Discrimination against spiritual minorities in Iran» (PDF). fdih.org. Retrieved 3 March 2009./>
- ^ Davis, Derek H. «The Evolution of Religious Liberty as a Universal Human Right» (PDF). Archived through the initial (PDF) on 23 July 2011. Retrieved 3 March 2009./>
- ^ Voltaire, François Marie Arouet de. (1909–14) . «Letter VI – regarding Presbyterians. Letters on the English». www.bartleby.com. The Harvard Classics. Retrieved 25 May 2017./>
- ^ Smith, Adam (1776), riches of Nations, Penn State Electronic Classics edition, republished 2005, pp. 643–49
- ^ Smith, Adam (1776), riches of Nations, Penn State Electronic Classics version, republished 2005, p. 647
- ^ a b «Hindu Beliefs». religionfacts.com./>
- ^ Brown, Erica; Galperin, Misha (2009). The situation for Jewish Peoplehood: Can We be One?. Jewish Lights Publishing. p. 71. ISBN 978-1-58023-401-6. The 'hood' isn't just a geographic reference; its a shared identity which may be characterized by joint assumptions, gestures, particular expressions, and a bunch of familial-like behaviors that unite an otherwise dispirate groupe of men and women./>
- ^ «Pew Forum on Religion and Public lifetime: international limitations on Religion (2009» http://www.pewforum.org/files/2009/12/restrictions-fullreport1.pdf
- ^ «Police arrest 5 females at Western Wall for wearing tallitot» Jerusalem Post (11 April 2013)
- ^ Maltz, Judy (26 November 2014). «Non-Orthodox Jews forbidden from praying in Knesset synagogue». Haaretz. Retrieved 21 April 2017./>
- ^ a b c «Declaration on religious freedom – Dignitatis humanae». Vatican.va. Archived from original on 11 February 2012. Retrieved 3 September 2011./>
- ^ Pope Pius IX. «The Syllabus». EWTN./>, Worldwide Catholic Network
- ^ «We claim the privilege of worshiping Almighty God based on the dictates of our personal conscience, and invite all men exactly the same privilege, let them worship exactly how, in which, or whatever they may», the eleventh Article of Faith.
- ^ Mutua, Makau. 2004. Facilitating Freedom of Religion or Belief, A Deskbook. Oslo Coalition on Freedom of Religion or Belief.
- ^ J. D. Van der Vyver; John Witte (1996). Spiritual peoples rights in international viewpoint: appropriate perspectives. 2. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. p. 418. ISBN 90-411-0177-2./>
- ^ «Introduction». Breaking India./>
- ^ Joel H. Spring (2001). Globalization and educational liberties: an intercivilizational analysis. Routledge. p. 92. ISBN 978-0-8058-3882-4./>
- ^ United states of america, Department of State. «2010 Overseas Religious Freedom Report». International Religious Freedom Report. US Department of State. Retrieved 15 February 2012./>
- ^ Islam and Belief: aware of Religious Freedom, Abdullah Saeed (2014): 8.
- ^ a b Global Federation for Human Rights (1 August 2003). «Discrimination against spiritual minorities in Iran» (PDF). fdih.org. Retrieved 20 October 2006./>
- ^ Iran Human Rights Documentation Center (2007). «A Faith Denied: The Persecution of Baha'is of Iran» (PDF). Iran Human Rights Documentation Center. Archived through the initial (PDF) on 27 November 2007. Retrieved 3 March 2007./>
- ^ Mayton, Joseph (19 December 2006). «Egypt's Bahais denied citizenship rights». Middle East Days. Archived through the initial on 2 April 2009. Retrieved 23 January 2007./>
- ^ Otterman, Sharon (17 December 2006). «Court denies Bahai couple document IDs». The Washington Days. Retrieved 23 January 2007./>
- ^ a b c Nkrumah, Gamal (21 December 2006). «Rendered faithless and stateless». Al-Ahram weekly. Archived from original on 23 January 2007. Retrieved 23 January 2007./>
- ^ «US State Department report on Greece». State.gov. 8 November 2005. Retrieved 3 September 2011./>
- ^ Mutua, Makau (2004). Facilitating Freedom of Religion or Belief, A Deskbook. Oslo Coalition on Freedom of Religion or Belief. p. 652. ISBN 978-90-04-13783-7./>
- ^ Sanu, Sankrant (2006). «Re-examining Religious Freedom» (PDF). Manushi. Retrieved 26 July 2008./>
- ^ «No place to call home» (PDF). Christian Solidarity Worldwide. 29 April 2008./>
- ^ «Archived copy». Archived through the original on 18 November 2007. Retrieved 11 November 2007.CS1 maint: Archived copy as name (website link)/> from «Leaving Islam: Apostates talk out» by Ibn Warraq
- ^ a b Heffening, W. «Murtadd». In P.J. Bearman; Th. Bianquis; C.E. Bosworth; E. van Donzel; W.P. Heinrichs (eds.). Encyclopaedia of Islam On The Web Edition. Brill Academic Publishers. ISSN 1573-3912./>
- ^ Adbul Qadir Oudah (1999). Kitab Bhavan. Brand New Delhi: Kitab Bhavan. ISBN 81-7151-273-9./>, Volume II. pp. 258–62; Amount IV. pp. 19–21
- ^ S. A. Rahman (2007). «Summary and Conclusions». Punishment of Apostasy in Islam. Another Press. pp. 132–42. ISBN 978-983-9541-49-6./>
- ^ Pencovic v. Pencovic, 45 Cal. 2d 67 (1955).
- ^ Criminal Law and Procedure, Daniel E. Hall. Cengage Learning, July 2008. p. 266. 
- ^ Bromberger, Brian (15 October 2015). «New guide details Windsor Supreme Court victory». Bay Region Reporter. Retrieved 16 October 2015./>
- ^ «Facts and Case Overview — Engel v. Vitale». United States Of America Courts. Retrieved 3 Might 2018./>
- ^ «Abington Class District V Schempp — Situations | Laws.com». cases.laws.com. Retrieved 3 May 2018./>
- ^ «Epperson V Arkansas — Situations | Laws.com». situations.laws.com. Retrieved 3 May 2018./>
- ^ «Gesetz über die religiöse Kindererziehung». Bundesrecht.juris.de. Retrieved 3 September 2011./>
- ^ Bundesgesetz 1985 über die religiöse Kindererziehung (pdf)
- ^ «Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch Art 303: Religiöse Erziehung». Gesetze.ch. Retrieved 3 September 2011./>
- ^ Margery Post Abbott (2011). Historical Dictionary of the Friends (Quakers). Scarecrow Press. p. 102. ISBN 978-0-8108-7088-8./>
- ^ Religious Freedom Day, 2006 – A Proclamation by the President associated with usa, Religious Freedom Day, 2001 – Proclamation by the President regarding the usa 15 January 2001
- ^ «US payment names 14 worst violators of spiritual freedom». Christianity Today. 29 April 2011. Retrieved 11 July 2011./>
^ «USCIRF Identifies World's Worst Religious Freedom Violators: Egypt Cited for very first Time» (news release). United states of america Commission on Global Religious Freedom. 28 April 2011. Retrieved 11 July 2011./>
^ Yearly Report 2011 (PDF) (Report). Usa Commission on International Religious Freedom. Might 2011. Archived through the original (PDF) on 23 October 2011. Retrieved 11 July 2011./>
- ^ «France Passes Religious Icon Ban». Christianity Today. 9 February 2004. Retrieved 29 April 2011./>
- ^ «The Islamic veil across Europe». BBC News. 17 November 2006. Retrieved 2 December 2006./>
- ^ International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Retrieved 4 July 2009.
- ^ a b «Global limitations on Religion (Executive summary)». The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life. December 2009. Retrieved 29 December 2009./>
- ^ a b «Global Restrictions on Religion (complete report)» (PDF). The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Lifetime. December 2009. Archived through the initial (PDF) on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 12 September 2013./>
- ^ a b «Latest styles in Religious Restrictions and Hostilities». Pew Forum. 26 February 2015./>
- ^ Rising Tide of Restrictions on Religion (Report). Pew Research Center. 20 September 2012./>
- ^ «Table: Social Hostilities Index by nation» (PDF). Pew Analysis Center. 2012. Archived through the initial (PDF) on 5 October 2012./>
- Daniel L. Dreisbach and Mark David Hall. The Sacred Rights of Conscience: chosen Readings on Religious Liberty and Church-State Relations in the US Founding (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund Press, 2009).
- Barzilai, Gad (2007). Law and Religion. Ashgate. ISBN 978-0-7546-2494-3.
- Beneke, Chris (20 September 2006). Beyond Toleration: The Spiritual Origins of American Pluralism. Oxford University Press, United States Of America. ISBN 0-19-530555-8.
- Curry, Thomas J. (19 December 1989). Church and State in the us to the Passage of the First Amendment. Oxford University Press; Reprint edition (19 December 1989). ISBN 0-19-505181-5.
- Frost, J. William (1990) an ideal Freedom: Religious Liberty in Pennsylvania (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press).
- Gaustad, Edwin S. (2004, 2nd ed.) Faith of this Founders: Religion therefore the brand new Nation, 1776–1826 (Waco: Baylor University Press).
- Hamilton, Marci A. (17 June 2005). Jesus vs. the Gavel: Religion and Rule of Law. Edward R. Becker (Foreword). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-85304-4.
- Hanson, Charles P. (1998). Necessary Virtue: The Pragmatic Origins of Religious Liberty in Brand New England. University Press of Virginia. ISBN 0-8139-1794-8.
- Hasson, Kevin 'Seamus', the best to be Wrong: Ending the Culture War Over Religion in America, Encounter Books, 2005, />ISBN 1-59403-083-9
- McLoughlin, William G. (1971). New England Dissent: The Baptists plus the Separation of Church and State (2 vols.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Murphy, Andrew R. (July 2001). Conscience and Community: Revisiting Toleration and Religious Dissent in Early Modern England and America. Pennsylvania State University Press. ISBN 0-271-02105-5.
- Mutua, Makau (2004). Facilitating Freedom of Religion or Belief, A Deskbook. Oslo Coalition on Freedom of Religion or Belief.
- Stokes, Anson Phelps (1950) Church and State in the us, Historic developing and modern Problems of Religious Freedom in Constitution, 3 Volumes (New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers).
- Stokes, DaShanne (In Press). Legalized Segregation additionally the Denial of Religious Freedom at the Wayback Machine (archived 27 October 2009)
- Stüssi Marcel, types of Religious Freedom: Switzerland, america, and Syria by Analytical, Methodological, and Eclectic Representation, 375 ff. (Lit 2012)., by Marcel Stüssi, research fellow at University of Lucerne.
- Associated Press (2002). Appeals court upholds man's utilization of eagle feathers for spiritual practices
- American Indian Religious Freedom Act (1978)
- Policy Concerning circulation of Eagle Feathers for Native United states Religious
- Ban on Minarets: On the Validity of a Controversial Swiss Popular Initiative (2008), , by Marcel Stuessi, research other during the University of Lucerne.
- «Religious Liberty: The legal framework in chosen OSCE countries» (PDF). Law Library, U.S. Library of Congress. May 2000. Archived from initial (PDF) on 25 June 2008. Retrieved 6 April 2007.
- Utt, Walter C. (1964). «Brickbats and Dead Cats» (PDF). Liberty. Washington, D.C.: Review and Herald Publishing Association. 59 (4, July–August): 18–21. Retrieved 23 June 2011.
- Utt, Walter C. (1960). «A Plea for the Somewhat Disorganized Man» (PDF). Liberty. Washington, D.C.: Review and Herald Publishing Association. 55 (4, July–August): 15–16, 29. Retrieved 24 June 2011.
- Utt, Walter C. (1974). «Toleration is a Nasty Word» (PDF). Liberty. Washington, D.C.: Review and Herald Publishing Association. 69 (2, March–April): 10–13. Retrieved 24 June 2011.
- Zippelius, Reinhold (2009). Staat und Kirche, ch.13. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. ISBN 978-3-16-150016-9.
External linksWikiquote has quotations associated with: Freedom of religion
- Religion and Foreign Policy Initiative, Council on Foreign Relations.
- The Complexity of Religion and also the Definition of «Religion» in Overseas Law Harvard Human Rights Journal article through the President and Fellows of Harvard College (2003)
- Human Rights quick #3, Freedom Of Religion and Belief Australian Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (HREOC)
- U.S. State Department country reports
- Institute for international Engagement
- Institute for Religious Freedom
- Universal Declaration of Human Rights
- Religious Freedom while the Constitution by Christopher L. Eisgruber, Lawrence G. Sager
- Religious Freedom Publications and Resources from the Anti-Defamation League
- What is Freedom of Religion? booklet
- Religious Freedom Resources from Mormon Newsroom
- Positive liberty
- Negative liberty
- Cognitive liberty
- Social liberty
- Free will
- Moral responsibility
- Goddess of Liberty
- Gun ownership
- Public speech
- Cannabis rights
- Equality prior to the law
- Freedom from arbitrary arrest and detention
- Freedom of assembly
- Freedom of association
- Freedom from cruel and unusual punishment
- Freedom from discrimination
- Freedom from exile
- Freedom of information
- Freedom of movement
- Freedom of religion
- Freedom from slavery
- Freedom of speech
- Freedom of thought
- Freedom from torture
- Legal aid
- LGBT rights
- Presumption of innocence
- Right of asylum
- Right to die
- Right to a reasonable trial
- Right to family life
- Right to help keep and bear arms
- Right to life
- Right to petition
- Right to privacy
- Right to protest
- Right to refuse medical treatment
- Right of self-defense
- Security of person
- Universal suffrage
- Digital rights
- Equal buy equal work
- Fair remuneration
- Labor rights
- Right to a satisfactory standard of living
- Right to clothing
- Right to development
- Right to education
- Right to food
- Right to health
- Right to housing
- Right to online access
- Right to property
- Right to general public participation
- Right of reply
- Right of return
- Right to science and culture
- Right to social security
- Right to water
- Right to work
- Trade union membership
- Family planning
- Freedom from involuntary feminine genital mutilation
- Intersex human rights
- LGBT rights
- Reproductive health
- Right to sexuality
- Corporal punishment
- Freedom from genocide
- Prisoner of war
- Wartime intimate violence
- Latin Church
- Eastern Catholicism
- Eastern Orthodoxy
- Oriental Orthodoxy
- Assyrian Church associated with the East
- Ancient Church of the East
- Moravian Church
- Plymouth Brethren
- Holiness movement
- Pentecostalism (Charismatic)
- Independent Catholicism
- Bible Students
- Jehovah's Witnesses
- Oneness Pentecostalism
- Traditionalist theology
- Modernist Salafism
- Sri Vaishnavism
- Brahma Sampradaya
- Nimbarka Sampradaya
- Kashmir Shaivism
- Sant Mat
- Vattisen Yaly
- Folk Taoism
- Yao Taoism
- Satsana Phi
- Đạo Mẫu
- Batak Parmalim
- Javanese Kejawèn
- Karo Pemena
- Philippine Dayawism
- Sumbese Marapu
- Sundanese Wiwitan
- Guanche church
- Fon and Ewe
- Tambor de Mina
- Trinidad Orisha
- Longhouse Religion
- Native United states Church
- Aboriginal Australian
- Falun Gong
- Fourth Way
- Goddess movement
- New Acropolis
- New Age
- New Thought
- Agni Yoga
- Transcendental Meditation
- UFO religion
- Unitarian Universalism
- White Brotherhood
- Imperial cult
- Cook Islands
- Rapa Nui
- Jamaican Maroon
- Apostasy / Disaffiliation
- Ethnic religion
- Folk religion
- Religious experience
- Cognitive science
- Evolutionary origin
- Evolutionary psychology
- National church
- National religiosity levels
- Political science
- Video games
- LaVeyan Satanism
- Humanistic Judaism
- Irreligion by country
- Secular humanism
- Secular theology
- Separation of church and state
- Abrahamic prophets
- Mass gatherings
- New religious movements
- Religions and spiritual traditions
- Christian left
- Christian right
- Separation of church and state
- "Render unto Caesar"
- Two kingdoms doctrine
- Freedom of religion
- Christian anarchism
- Christian democracy
- Clerical fascism
- Christian communism
- Evangelical left
- Christian feminism
- Christian libertarianism
- National Catholicism
- Christian pacifism
- Political Catholicism
- Christian Reconstructionism
- Christian socialism
- Christian Zionism
- Poverty and wealth
- Catholic social teaching
- Dominion theology
- Liberation theology
- Political theology
- Middle East
- Sub-Saharan Africa
- Social Gospel
- Christian republic
- Divine right of kings
- Christianity as well as other religions
- Civil religion
- Political technology of religion
- State religion
- Classical antiquity
- Late antiquity
- Middle Ages
- Early modern period
- Age of Discovery
- Age of Enlightenment
- Scientific Revolution
- Late contemporary period
- Age of Revolution
- Industrial Revolution
- Great Divergence
- Modern era
- World War I
- Universal suffrage
- World War II
- Cold War
- Information Age
- Cradle of civilization
- Old World
- Greco-Roman world
- Romano-Germanic culture
- Carolingian Empire
- Holy Roman Empire
- Art music
- Popular culture
- Hellenistic philosophy
- Judeo-Christian ethics
- Christian philosophy
- Christian existentialism
- Christian humanism
- Secular humanism
- Continental philosophy
- Analytic philosophy
- Jewish culture
- Christian culture
- Catholic Church
- Latin Church
- Eastern Christianity
- Natural law
- Rule of law
- Equality before the law
- Human rights
- Right to life
- Freedom of speech
- Freedom of religion
- International law
- Pax Europaea
- European Union
- First World
- Free World
- GND: 4125186-6
- LCCN: sh85112662
- NARA: 10638099
- NDL: 00571078