In this case study two principles are used to understand the ethical issues on downloading movies and TV. But before it is explained the theories should be understood clearly. It is an ethical issue for the downloader and legal steps can be taken and copyright infringement notice can be given to the downloader. But there are no laws that criminalize Australians downloading and watching content for their own individual use (www.smh.com.au, 2016).
Application of ethical theory to the analysisConsequentialism: This theory determines the consequence of the action taken by an individual. The outcome of an action is determined by applying this theory, when an individual engage in doing some work they should think about the outcome from that work according to their environmental surrounding. This means that an individual should not do a task that has a negative impact on the environment. As a personal he should think that he is doing right or wrong job and its consiquences (Carlson, 2013).
Based on the topic downloading movie or tv from internet an individual should consider his ethical values and judge himself that what would be the effect if he downloads an content that is copyright protected (Vossen, 2014). The person should not always think about his profit rather than put some concentration on the effect that would be caused for their work done.Non-Consequentialism: In this theory the personal engaged in doing some job doesn’t think about the consequence of the work they do. The consequence is judged after carrying out the task and on that basis the next action is taken. Ethics plays as the least part in Non Consequentialism the major focus of the individual is on completing his task (Nye et al., 2015).
Illegal Downloading “is” Stealing
There are many laws against the copyright and breaking this law can cause a huge fine on the downloader. If anyone is caught downloading paid media with copyright protection the copyright owner can file a case against him and it can cause fine or jail. Downloading the media is wrong, and everyone should have a moral value and similar punishment is given for stealing media from the store.
No punishment or fine should be given for downloading music or movies that are free in the internet. Youtube is completely free for the user to watch music videos and if online videos can be seen on youtube for free then anyone can have it on their computer also. Anyone can search the internet to listen for a free song but cannot download it; it is unreasonable that the download of the free content causes legal violation. It is similar to record a TV show from the cable box.
Some people may think that they pay for the cable connection but internet is also not free, it is rather more expensive than a cable connection, people can put the recorded show in the internet and it should not be illegal for downloading it. Some people pirate it for money and selling the video content for money is definitely a piracy and they should be fined for that (Aaltonen & Salmi, 2013). Some people have the point of view that, when they get the media for free then why would they pay money to buy it, the moral sense of the public should grow up and there should be more awareness regarding piracy of the web content. Downloading a media that doesn’t have a negative impact on the economy should not be considered as an illegal activity.
There are many effective solutions to solve downloading of movies illegally such as.
This problem can be solved by implementing some regulations on the source site from where the media is available.
The owner of some media can apply new legislation policies for the medium through which the media is made available to the user.
The price for which the content should be available to the user should be such that the user would pay happily.
More awareness to discourage the Australians for using pirate sites and increase their ethical value should be done.
The original content should be made available to the web on their release this reduces the piracy to a great level.
The school college and public wifi provider should be responsible to track the internet usage and for the infringement notice.
In this study the topic “Downloading movies and TV is not a crime” is studied in details and we conclude that the media that is free to watch on the internet should be free to download and the users should not get copyright infringement notice for that. The usage of internet to download paid content from torrent engines or other downloader should be considered as an illegal activity and fine can be imposed for that. As this causes a huge loss in the economy, the artists creates music CDs or DVDs that costs them and it should not be made available to the people at free of cost.
Aaltonen, M., & Salmi, V. (2013). Versatile delinquents or specialized pirates? A comparison of correlates of illegal downloading and traditional juvenile crime. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 14(2), 188-195.
Carlson, E. (2013). Consequentialism reconsidered (Vol. 20). Springer Science & Business Media.
Cockrill, A., & Goode, M. M. (2012). DVD pirating intentions: Angels, devils, chancers and receivers. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 11(1), 1-10.
Life, D., News, D., & crime, D. (2014). Downloading movies and TV is not a crime. The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 27 May 2016, from
Nye, H., Plunkett, D., & Ku, J. (2015). Non-Consequentialism Demystified.
Robertson, K., McNeill, L., Green, J., & Roberts, C. (2012). Illegal downloading, ethical concern, and illegal behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(2), 215-227.
Vossen, C. (2014). Cyber Attacks Under the United Nations Charter. Critical Reflections on Consequentialist Reasoning. Critical Reflections on Consequentialist Reasoning.(August 11, 2014).
Wang, X., & McClung, S. R. (2012). The immorality of illegal downloading: The role of anticipated guilt and general emotions. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 153-159.