Ethical Decision Making Framework Essay

Question:

Analysis Ethical Decision Making Framework?

Answer:

Introduction

In this report, the moral and ethical dilemma regarding a certain case study been analyzed and prepared. The report has been prepared using different frameworks for ethical decision making and as a result, a clear analysis is available.

The question number 1 has asked about the benefits of the action. The answer is addressed in the following.

Benefits of the Chosen Action

Vulnerability: The benefit of the chosen action is that the vulnerability caused in terms of production will be significantly removed and a steady rate of growth will be maintained.

Stakeholders:

Public: Public will not be directly affected with this action. However, due to a certain cap in the productivity from the employees, the customers will be satisfied with the services.

The Organization Selling IS products and Services: The company will enjoy a steady growth in production as the employees are expected to provided high productivity to gain their wages (Malle et al. 2015).

Individual IS Business Analyst: Individually, the employees are expected to work hard and earn maximum sales productivity for the company in order to earn their full payments, hence, they will benefit the company as a whole.

The Organization’s Business Clients: Clients will not be directly affected with this action. However, due to a certain cap in the productivity from the employees, the clients will be satisfied with the services (Van Cranenburgh and Arenas 2014).

The IS Industry: The industry will enjoy a steady growth in production as well as revenue the employees are expected to provided high productivity to gain their wages.

Harm Caused by the Action

Vulnerability: Due to the possible dissatisfaction among the employees, the vulnerability in the sales production will increase resulting in poor productivity and loss of revenue for the organization.

Stakeholders:

Public: There is no direct effect on the public from the harms of the action. However, due to a certain cap in the productivity from the employees, they may get dissatisfied and provide poor sales productivity resulting in public dissatisfaction.

The Organization Selling IS products and Services: The company will not enjoy a steady growth if the employee are dissatisfied and failed to deliver sufficient sales productivity even if it means curtail in the salary of the employee (Kahane et al. 2015).

Individual IS Business Analyst: Due to a certain cap in the productivity for the individual employees, they may get dissatisfied and provide poor sales productivity resulting in public dissatisfaction.

The Organization’s Business Clients: Clients will not be directly affected with this action. However, due to a certain cap in the productivity from the employees, they may get dissatisfied and provide poor sales productivity resulting in public dissatisfaction (Shrage 2013).

The IS Industry: The industry will not enjoy a steady growth if the employee are dissatisfied and failed to deliver sufficient sales productivity even if it means curtail in the salary of the employee.

Benefits if action is universalised

Vulnerability: The benefit of the universalization of the chosen action is that the vulnerability caused in terms of production will be significantly removed and a steady rate of global growth will be maintained.

Stakeholders:

Public: Public from all over the world will not be directly affected with the universalization of the action. However, due to a certain cap in the productivity from the global employees, worldwide customers will be satisfied with the services (Friesdorf, Conway and Gawronski 2015).

The Organization Selling IS products and Services: The company will enjoy a steady growth in production as the employees are expected to provided high productivity to gain their wages.

Individual IS Business Analyst: Individually, the employees are expected to work hard and earn maximum sales productivity for the company in order to earn their full payments, hence, they will benefit the company as a whole (Hursthouse 2013).

The Organization’s Business Clients: Global business clients will not be directly affected with this action. However, due to a certain cap in the productivity from the employees, the global clients will be satisfied with the services.

The IS Industry: Global industry will enjoy a steady growth in production as well as revenue the employees are expected to provided high productivity to gain their wages.

Harm if action is universalised

Vulnerability: Due to the possible dissatisfaction among the employees, the vulnerability in the sales production will increase resulting in poor productivity and loss of revenue for the organization on a global scale.

Stakeholders:

Public: Global public will not be directly affected with this action. However, due to a certain cap in the productivity from the employees, they may get dissatisfied and provide poor sales productivity resulting in public dissatisfaction.

The Organization Selling IS products and Services: The organization will not enjoy a steady growth if the employee are dissatisfied and failed to deliver sufficient sales productivity even if it means curtail in the salary of the employee (Morris and McDonald 2013).

Individual IS Business Analyst: Due to a certain cap in the productivity for the individual employees, they may get dissatisfied and provide poor sales productivity resulting in public dissatisfaction.

The Organization’s Business Clients: Global business clients will not be directly affected with this action (Ganz, Wagner and Toren 2015). However, due to a certain cap in the productivity from the employees, they may get dissatisfied and provide poor sales productivity resulting in public dissatisfaction on a global scale.

The IS Industry: Global IS industry will not enjoy a steady growth if the employee are dissatisfied and failed to deliver sufficient sales productivity even if it means curtail in the salary of the employee.

Contradiction if universalised

Vulnerability: Vulnerability on a global scale will be decreased for the company due to high sales productivity but on the other hand, the internal vulnerabilities of the company will persist.

Stakeholders:

Public: Due to universalization, the company can have global reach and will be able to serve customers globally, but the loss of employee morale and satisfaction will contradict this possible beneficial service for the customers (Weiss 2014).

The Organization Selling IS products and Services: Company will have access to global market and will be able to do in-sourcing but due to reduction in productivity, international clients may get dissatisfied.

Individual IS Business Analyst: The violation of rights will enrage the employees and will force them to resign from the organization (Noddings 2013).

The Organization’s Business Clients: Due to universalization, the company can have global reach and will be able to serve clients globally, but the loss of employee morale and satisfaction will contradict this possible beneficial service for the clients.

The IS Industry: Industry will bring together the global market and will be able to do in-sourcing but due reduction in productivity, international clients may get dissatisfied.

Used as means to end, violating their rights

Vulnerability: Vulnerability on a internal scale of the company will increase due to violation of employee rights and payments.

Stakeholders:

Public: The company will try to reach the global market with universalization and will be able to serve customers globally, but they will definitely be violating the rights of the employees if they pay their employees based on the sales targets achieved by them.

The Organization Selling IS products and Services: Company will have access to global market and will be able to do in-sourcing but due to violation of the policies, internal employees may get dissatisfied (Baskerville and Wood-Harper 2016).

Individual IS Business Analyst: Individually, the employees will get dissatisfied and will also loose motivation and morale for providing high sales productivity.

The Organization’s Business Clients: The company will experience global trends due to universalization, but the loss of employee morale and satisfaction will contradict this possible beneficial service for the clients (Shapiro and Gross 2013).

The IS Industry: The industry will experience globalization but due reduction in productivity, international clients may get dissatisfied, resulting in negative impacts on the industry.

Violating rights, seen as unjust (to powerless), action-taker has more power

Vulnerability: Vulnerability on an internal scale of the company will increase due to violation of employee rights and payments.

Stakeholders:

Public: Universalization is not sufficient for the organization unless it stops violating rights of the employees as well as the customers. The employees have their rights to receive full salary from the company that they are not given unless sales targets are met.

The Organization Selling IS products and Services: The higher authority of the organization should take sufficient steps to ensure the rights of the employees are not violated by the company’s policies (Ford and Richardson 2013).

Individual IS Business Analyst: The business analysts will get dissatisfied with the violation of rights and will not provide sufficient sales productivity.

The Organization’s Business Clients: If the organization continues violating the rights of the employees, the productivity will decrease and the business clients will not get best quality services or products from the organization (Christians et al. 2015).

The IS Industry: Industry will bring together the global market and will be able to do in-sourcing but due reduction in productivity, international clients may get dissatisfied.

Full Framework Analysis

Framework

Public

Vulnerability

Company

Individual

Clients

Industry

Benefits of this action?

Public will not be directly affected with this action.

The benefit of the chosen action is that the vulnerability caused in terms of production will be significantly removed

The company will enjoy a steady growth in production

Individually, the employees are expected to work hard and earn maximum sales productivity

Clients will not be directly affected with this action

The industry will enjoy a steady growth in production as well as revenue

Harm caused by this action?

Public will not be directly affected with this action

Due to the possible dissatisfaction among the employees, the vulnerability in the sales production will increase

The company will not enjoy a steady growth if the employee are dissatisfied

Due to a certain cap in the productivity for the individual employees, they may get dissatisfied

Clients will not be directly affected with this action

The industry will not enjoy a steady growth if the employee are dissatisfied

Benefits if action is universalised?

Public from all over the world will not be directly affected with the universalization of the action

The benefit of the universalization of the chosen action is that the vulnerability caused in terms of production will be significantly removed

Global companies will enjoy a steady growth in production

Individually, the employees are expected to work hard and earn maximum sales productivity for the company

Global Clients will not be directly affected with this action

Global industry will enjoy a steady growth in production as well as revenue

Harm if action is universalised?

Global public will not be directly affected with this action.

Due to the possible dissatisfaction among the employees, the vulnerability in the sales production will increase resulting in poor productivity

Global companies will not enjoy a steady growth if the employee are dissatisfied

Due to a certain cap in the productivity for the individual employees, they may get dissatisfied and provide poor sales productivity resulting in public dissatisfaction

Global clients will not be directly affected with this action.

Global industry will not enjoy a steady growth if the employee are dissatisfied

Contradiction if universalised?

The company will try to reach the global market with universalization and will be able to serve customers globally, but they will definitely be violating the rights of the employees if they pay their employees based on the sales targets achieved by them

Vulnerability on a global scale will be decreased for the company due to high sales productivity

Company will have access to global market

Thee loss of employee morale and satisfaction will contradict the possible beneficial services for the clients

The company will experience global trends due to universalization

The industry will experience globalization but due reduction in productivity, international clients may get dissatisfied, resulting in negative impacts on the industry

Used as means to end, violating their rights?

The company’s payment policy may violate the rights of the employees

Vulnerability on a internal scale of the company will increase

Company may violate the rights of employees

Individually, the employees will get dissatisfied

Employee dissatisfaction will result in negative effect on the company in the global market

Industry will be negatively impacted

Violating rights, seen as unjust (to powerless), action-taker has more power?

The higher authority has the power to ensure the rights of the employees are not violated

Vulnerability on a internal scale of the company will increase

Higher authorities need to take suitable actions to stop violating the employee rights

Individually, the employees will get dissatisfied

Employee dissatisfaction will result in negative effect on the company in the global market

Industry will be negatively impacted

Conclusion

In this report, the moral and ethical dilemma regarding a certain case study been analyzed and prepared. With the help of the tables provided, the moral and ethical dilemma has been analyzed and documented.

References

Baskerville, R.L. and Wood-Harper, A.T., 2016. A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research. In Enacting Research Methods in Information Systems: Volume 2 (pp. 169-190). Springer International Publishing.

Christians, C.G., Fackler, M., Richardson, K., Kreshel, P. and Woods, R.H., 2015. Media ethics: Cases and moral reasoning. Routledge.

Ford, R.C. and Richardson, W.D., 2013. Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature. In Citation classics from the Journal of Business Ethics (pp. 19-44). Springer Netherlands.

Friesdorf, R., Conway, P. and Gawronski, B., 2015. Gender Differences in Responses to Moral Dilemmas A Process Dissociation Analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, p.0146167215575731.

Ganz, F.D., Wagner, N. and Toren, O., 2015. Nurse middle manager ethical dilemmas and moral distress. Nursing ethics, 22(1), pp.43-51.

Hursthouse, R., 2013. Normative virtue ethics. ETHICA, 645.

Kahane, G., Everett, J.A., Earp, B.D., Farias, M. and Savulescu, J., 2015. ‘Utilitarian’judgments in sacrificial moral dilemmas do not reflect impartial concern for the greater good. Cognition, 134, pp.193-209.

Malle, B.F., Scheutz, M., Arnold, T., Voiklis, J. and Cusimano, C., 2015, March. Sacrifice one for the good of many?: People apply different moral norms to human and robot agents. In Proceedings of the tenth annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 117-124). ACM.

Morris, S.A. and McDonald, R.A., 2013. The role of moral intensity in moral judgments: An empirical investigation. In Citation Classics from the Journal of Business Ethics (pp. 463-479). Springer Netherlands.

Noddings, N., 2013. Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education. Univ of California Press.

Shapiro, J.P. and Gross, S.J., 2013. Ethical educational leadership in turbulent times:(Re) solving moral dilemmas. Routledge.

Shrage, L., 2013. Moral dilemmas of feminism: Prostitution, adultery, and abortion. Routledge.

Van Cranenburgh, K.C. and Arenas, D., 2014. Strategic and moral dilemmas of corporate philanthropy in developing countries: Heineken in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of business ethics, 122(3), pp.523-536.

Weiss, J.W., 2014. Business ethics: A stakeholder and issues management approach. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

How to cite this essay: