Just what have you any idea about the “food” you might be eating?

In his documentary, Food Inc., Robert Kenner forces his market to inquire of on their own this question. Throughout their film, Kenner portrays the United states food industry as an environmentally and economically corrupt system. By exposing their audience towards practices of big factories, Kenner tries to convince united states that people are misinformed. The blend of tone and scene-shots utilized in the movie serve to support the idea that, in comparison to rural farms, the conduct of massive food businesses is selfish, unethical and eventually damaging on industry.

Documentaries can be very powerful as they combine pictures and videos with terms. Within the beginning regarding the documentary, the presenter mentions a “pastoral fantasy”. He states, “You go in to the supermarket and also you see pictures of farmers… The picket fence… plus the green grass.” This element of the movie argues your images we come across on services and products offered in supermarkets are section of a disguise. The background music that is played since these terms are increasingly being spoken is somewhat hypnotic. The tempo mimics compared to a horror film. Kenner successfully instills a worrisome feeling in his audience, making us feel as though we have been being tricked by a conniving villain. The speaker also goes as far as saying, “There is this deliberate veil, this curtain, that’s dropped between us and in which our food is from. The doesn’t want one to know the truth about what you’re consuming because in the event that you knew, you might not want to eat it.” This acutely clear and forceful statement may be the last spoken line into the introduction of this movie.

The tone and language used through the entire film serve to highlight a good contrast between big factory-based, industrial organizations and little farmlands. We hear good language to check out stunning, bright pictures whenever tiny farmland is on display, while a dark and dull tone is applied to scenes involving multi-national food processing factories. Photos of dense grey smoke and massive metal equipment are acclimatized to emphasize the synthetic, assembly line machine processes used by a few well-known businesses.

Disturbing scenes of slaughter houses are shown throughout the movie. The viewer watches as tens and thousands of densely packed pigs, cows and birds, are killed and changed on assembly lines. On the other hand, pleasant scenes of free-roaming cattle in open grasslands are opted for to express a Joel Salatin’s organic Polyface Farm in Swoope, Virginia, as Salatin’s farm is a prime exemplory instance of Kenner’s ideals.

Food Inc. does an excellent work of exposing the US public to your food industry. However, because Kenner’s views are incredibly extreme and one-sided, personally think the documentary is highly exaggerated. For instance, one part of the movie is focused on telling the story of Barb Kowalcyk, whose two-year-old son, Kevin, died after developing hemolytic-uremic problem considering consuming a hamburger contaminated with E.coli. While this is a horrifying, true story, i really believe it conveys an exaggerated message that junk food is killing our kids.

Food Inc. certainly drives house Kenner’s argument concerning the corruption of our food industry and “the very mechanized underbelly that’s been hidden from United states consumer because of the permission of our government’s regulatory agencies.” But the film continues to be incredibly polar. The documentary acknowledges only two extremes associated with the spectrum and doesn't include corporations that fall someplace in the centre (between highly industrialized factories and also the agrarian/pastoral Farmer Joel). The documentary additionally does little to identify others part associated with argument. Kenner does not compliment mass manufacturing organizations and I believe this may donate to the growth of their authority.


How to cite this essay: