Diversity Democracy Dissent: Compatibility With Representation Essay

Question:

Discuss about the Diversity Democracy Dissent for Compatibility with Representation.

Answer:

Democracy is a governing inspiration where citizens have the privilege of electing their representative as the government in an independent and liberal environment (Bl?hdorn 2013). In this paper, the principle of authentic democracy has been analysed with its compatibility in the current political environment throughout the globe. Criticising the democratic representation is another aspect of this paper. The fundamental structure and practical implementation of democracy have been analysed with its operational classification and implementation. The position of youth perception and its effect on current political conflicts has been criticised in this paper with an appropriate example of various democratic approaches. The fundamental, practical and conceptual differences between Procedural Democracy and Authentic Democracy have been discussed to find the most applicable modification of modern politics.

Democracy is a system of governing a nation by empowering the citizen’s rights and decision making within any operational field of the government. In more simple approach, democracy is a governing idea where citizens have the right to elect their government in an independent and liberal environment (Cohen and Allen 2013). However, there are some ideological conflicts among various definitions of proper democratic practices. Moreover, the democratic practice allows the common people to select their representatives as a governing body to rule the nation as per the boundaries of respective constitutions. However, Democracy does not only mean free and independent election system. Rather, appreciating the privileges of common citizens and their rights in every aspect of governing the nation is the pillar of the democratic approach. From the early stage of modern civilization, democracy had a different way of exposure (Cooke 2018). Democratic structure of each nation is individual considering individual national and cultural identities.

As per the most modern democratic approaches, democracy is more related to participation of people, human rights, rules of low and constitutional practices rather than focusing on the elective power of the people. This diverted implementation is causing frequent political and socio-cultural chaos across the world. Legal equality, political freedom, and constitutional rule are the three main pillar of a democratic nation. On the other hand, other parts of the human civilization also include the judicial review as a part of their democratic structure.

Democracy can be classified into two ideological approaches namely Procedural Democracy and Authentic Democracy. Procedural democracy is largely related to capitalist democracy, while authentic democracy is more emphasised on direct approach of socialised democracy (Foster 2013). For both of these practices, corruption can make meaning of democracy nothing but an empty slogan. Procedural democracy is more emphasised on the bill of rights and protect minorities. However, authentic democracy encourages the independent and liberal civilisation having equal legal and economical constraints. Authentic democracy is more focused providing basic needs of citizens like health, food, shelter and education in exchange for very less amount of domestic value (Gardiner et al. 2014).

From the age of evaluated monarchy system, the authentic democracy has been dominated by other democratic ideologies. However, according to some researcher, only democracy cannot provide political and personal freedom unless the institutions of civil society are also present. Most of the western countries follow the democratic approach of Parliamentary sovereignty while maintaining judicial independence (Mirra et al. 2013). However, other parts of the human civilization also include the judicial review as a part of their democratic structure. Authentic democracy is possible only in presence of constitutional laws and the basis of the proper conception of political and governing approaches.

Recently, there is a tendency of claiming the agnosticism and sceptical relativism implementing the philosophy and the fundamental approach correspond to democratic forms of political structure. From the Democratic point of view since the ultimate social decisions cannot be acceptable which is determined by the majority, it will be considered as a subject to variation according to different political trends (Rizvi 2013). According to the history, a democracy without values and constitution can easily transfer into biased and disguised totalitarianism. Removing misconception of democracy in youth by transparent understanding of origin to an implementation of democratic approaches can lead the society towards the ideal stability. Some of the researchers claim that authentic democracy is the most direct and proper approach to democracy. However in terms of implementation of authentic democracy has been proven wrong throughout the history of democratic revolution.

The concept of authentic democracy is simpler, while it is more complex for executing within a cosmopolitan environment. However, most of the cases the significant distractions come from the elected government and major political groups (Schusler and Krasny 2015). Lack of concept about democracy and ideological conflict within constitutional practices are the major causes of this operational failure. On the other hand, some of the democratic countries have successfully implemented the authentic democracy within a particular period of history. Ancient Athens is one of the ideal examples of direct or authentic democracy where the governing body voted themselves on major factors. The majority of assembly's vote decided most of the court case in Ancient Athens.

According to some experts, authentic democracy or direct democracy is not implemented anywhere in the worlds. Rather, the idea of democracy has been converted into liberalist oligarchy. This diverted implementation is causing frequent political and socio-cultural chaos throughout the globe (Shiller 2013). Preventive liberal execution of constitutional rules and election system are making this whole situation more complicated leading towards the ultimate destruction. However, there is no optimum implementation of a democratic approach to stop the beginning of political annihilation. The stability of this political imbalance is possible only in presence of proper conception of political and governing approaches amongst the young generation of the globe.

On the other hand, incorporating youth in a political movement is not the ideal way to access this stability. Rather, removing misconception of democracy by transparent understanding of origin to the implementation of democratic approaches can lead the society towards the ideal stability (Taft and Gordon 2013). The moral and cultural simplicity can be the only way to teach the new generation about effective and unbiased democratic system. The human civilization should also include the authentic democracy influenced judicial practices as a part of their democratic structure in order to hold the stable political environment irrespective of any geographical and demographical differences.

As per the above discussion, it can be said, that the fundamental structure and practical implementation of democracy can be classified according to its operational classification and implementation. However, for both Procedural Democracy and Authentic Democracy practices, corruption can make meaning of democracy nothing but an empty slogan. On the other hand, conceptual lack of democracy and ideological conflict within constitutional practices are the major causes of this operational failure. However, some of the democratic countries have successfully implemented the authentic democracy within the certain period of history. Moreover, authentic democracy is more focused providing basic needs of citizens like health, food, shelter and education in exchange for very less amount of domestic value. From the above discussion, it can be stated that only democracy cannot provide political and personal freedom unless the institutions of civil society are also present. Therefore, removing misconception of democracy by a clear understanding of origin to the implementation of democratic approaches can lead the society towards the ideal stability.

References:

Bl?hdorn, I., 2013. The governance of unsustainability: ecology and democracy after the post-democratic turn. Environmental politics, 22(1), pp.16-36.

Cohen, E. and Allen, A., 2013. Toward an ideal democracy: The impact of standardization policies on the American Indian/Alaska Native community and language revitalization efforts. Educational Policy, 27(5), pp.743-769.

Cooke, M., 2018. Five arguments for deliberative democracy. In Democracy as public deliberation (pp. 53-87). Routledge.

Foster, D.L., 2013. The nature of authentic governance: A treatise on democratic rhetoric and rhetorical democracy(Doctoral dissertation, University of Denver).

Gardiner, M.E., Howard, M.P., Tenuto, P.L. and Muzaliwa, A.I.I., 2014. Authentic leadership praxis for democracy: A narrative inquiry of one state superintendency. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 17(2), pp.217-236.

Mirra, N., Morrell, E.D., Cain, E., Scorza, D.A. and Ford, A., 2013. Educating for a critical democracy: Civic participation reimagined in the Council of Youth Research. Democracy and Education, 21(1), p.3.

Rizvi, F., 2013. Williams on democracy and the governance of education. In Views beyond the border country (pp. 145-169). Routledge.

Schusler, T.M. and Krasny, M.E., 2015. Science and Democracy in Youth Environmental Action–Learning “Good” Thinking. In EcoJustice, Citizen Science and Youth Activism(pp. 363-384). Springer, Cham.

Shiller, J.T., 2013. Preparing for democracy: How community-based organizations build civic engagement among urban youth. Urban education, 48(1), pp.69-91.

Taft, J.K. and Gordon, H.R., 2013. Youth activists, youth councils, and constrained democracy. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 8(1), pp.87-100.

How to cite this essay: