Critical Reflection: Scientific Management Theory Essay

Question:

Discuss about the Critical Reflection for Scientific Management Theory.

Answer:

Introduction

The paper provides reflection on the work of group presentation and also discuss various management theories that are effective for the reflection paper. The paper also provides reflection on the decision-making process along with the group formation process for preparing the presentation.

Reflection

The group presentation that was performed in the academic activity is quite impressing and effective as the team members are all known to me. In most of the time, it can be seen that working with the group that also in college and university is quite challenging. This is due to the fact that decision making is quite difficult for the group members. The preparation of group presentation provides a view on the working concept of various people in the group (Azadnia et al., 2015). The first stage that is being utilized in the presentation is the formation of the group and for this Tuckman model was used. The model has four stages and they are forming, storming, norming and performing (Fiore, and Georganta, 2017). Forming the first stage where the team is assembled as well as the task is being distributed. Then the second stage of Storming is obtained where the entire team addresses the task by suggesting various ideas (Natvig, and Stark, 2016). This phase helps me to build up a suitable relationship with the other team members. The third stage is the norming where the team members start to resolve their issues. And the fourth stage is the performing where the hard work is essential to the team members.

In the teamwork for preparing the presentation the most difficult phase is to obtain a suitable decision for the presentation. In this entire group member came up with the view that majority opinion will get the priority regarding the process of decision making. In this system of a majority opinion, 1% difference will have the great value for the decision-making process (Romiszowski, 2016). The scientific management theory provides the view that the decision is made with the help of particular data and information (Waring, 2016). This help the organization to make an effective decision for the firm. This theory helps me and all the team member to make an effective decision regarding the various facts within the presentation. From this group work, it helps me to develop a suitable process for communication along with decision-making process within the field. The theory of human relationship management provides the view on a need of the workers along with the need of the company adopting various policies (Gond et al., 2016). This theory allows me to develop a suitable presentation that is generally required for the project.

While performing this group works my communication skill has developed and also this allows me to work in a better way within the team. During the preparation of the presentation, the most difficult part that is faced by the team is that everyone is agreeing with one concept. While performing in a team the most effective part is to listen to others and then make some decision. This is one of the vital things that I have learned from the group presentation which allow me to have the capability of listening to others. This group taught me to do qualified research for the various project that would help me in my future development. Working in the team is quite challenging but it helps me to develop my skill and my knowledge in various part. The most important thing that I learned from this teamwork is the way to perform suitable decision-making process for the particular thing. In future also it will help me to develop the working process and my career to make vital and appropriate decisions.

Conclusion

The paper concludes the fact that working within a team is both effective and challenging. It directly depends on the people how they develop the things and manage to work within a team. Working within a group is essential to develop various skill within the people.

References

Azadnia, A.H., Saman, M.Z.M. and Wong, K.Y., 2015. Sustainable supplier selection and order lot-sizing: an integrated multi-objective decision-making process. International Journal of Production Research, 53(2), pp.383-408.

Fiore, S.M., and Georganta, E., 2017. Collaborative Problem-Solving and Team Development: Extending the Macrocognition in Teams Model through Considerations of the Team Life Cycle. In Team Dynamics Over Time (pp. 189-208). Emerald Publishing Limited.

Gond, J.P., Cabantous, L., Harding, N. and Learmonth, M., 2016. What do we mean by performativity in organizational and management theory? The uses and abuses of performativity. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(4), pp.440-463.

Natvig, D. and Stark, N.L., 2016. A Project Team Analysis Using Tuckman's Model of Small-Group Development. Journal of Nursing Education, 55(12), pp.675-681.

Romiszowski, A.J., 2016. Designing instructional systems: Decision making in course planning and curriculum design. Routledge.

Waring, S.P., 2016. Taylorism Transformed: Scientific management theory since 1945. UNC Press Books.

How to cite this essay: