Crime Afforded Equal Recognition In Society Essay

Question:

Discuss About The Crime Afforded Equal Recognition In Society.

Answer:

Introduction

The word ‘victim’ could be associated with an individual who has encountered some form of misfortune or suffering, however, when the word ‘victim’ is thought of policing perspective it is used to refer to complainant of the crime. Therefore, there are crime that are bigger than the others, all the criminals not be treated the same. However as much as crimes are committed it does not means that these individuals should be treated differently in the society when they get reformed. They have the right of their own and should be accorded equal dignity to all as well as the politics of difference where everyone is recognized for a particular distinctiveness. However, on my view, I disagree with this statement because the society today does not recognition that all the crime are the same since they believe each crime has its own magnitude and the punishment is not the same. This annotated bibliography aims to critically analyse the statement ‘All victims of crime are afforded equal recognition in society’. To support this statement I will raise various there are points and use a crime type to of a student who steals money to pay his fees. There are four academic sources which have been selected for the annotated essay.

Adam, H., 2017. Divided Memories: Reckoning with a Criminal Regime. In Justice and the Politics of Memory (pp. 17-36). Routledge.

According to Adam (2017) he has highlighted that recognition is to equal dignity which is accorded to all. This therefore means that victims of crime should not be judged by the society, it is important for the individuals in the society to understand the circumstances surrounding the crime. According to Schlosberg observed that lack of recognition in the social realms clearly demonstrate some levels of inflict damage to oppressed persons and communities in the cultural realms. On the issue of this statement he highlighted that wrongdoing is perpetrated by the society as unlawful act. In the society we live today individuals do not view the crimes as the same. There are those crimes which are highly judged for instance you cannot compare a bank robber with conmen. These two crimes are treated differently in regards to the fines that are imposed yet; both of them are crimes that were committed. There is need for a development of criteria and definitions of crimes which are not restricted to specific laws, but more universal in nature.


Lanier, M.M., Henry, S. and Desire'JM, A., 2014. Essential criminology. Hachette UK.

Based on this book, the authors have highlighted that crimes have different degree of seriousness. Each crime which is committed involves assessing various factors such as the physical effect of the conduct on the victim, psychological trauma, and the monetary value of the property crimes. An example is given of a student who lacks fees and has seen an opportunity that stealing money will solve his problem and he would go back to school. In the long run he believes that this act will help him even though it is a crime. In such a case even though it is a crime to steal the student has decided to help himself. This has physical effect on the conduct of the student. Despite going to all this trouble, the society will judge the student for the crime committed and would not recognize the basis of doing that wrongful act.

Reid, S.T., 2015. Crime and criminology. Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.

According to the Titus (2015), society discriminates criminal victim because of the deed they did in the past. The society we live today, discriminate against the criminals to a great extent. Individuals do not like to be associated with them despite the magnitude of the crime that was committed. Many do not believe that criminals could change and give them a second chance to correct their mistake. An example, an ex-convict who has finished his sentence and moves back to his former neighborhood would encounter a cold society. Not many would want to be associated with him despite going through the system to correct his mistakes. More often, there are cases of mistaken arrest and individuals have been sentenced, even after finishing such sentence and come back to their society many do not want to know the circumstances that led to their arrest. They are also treated different in the society.

Weisburd, D., 2015. The law of crime concentration and the criminology of place. Criminology, 53(2), pp.133-157.

David (2015) in this article focuses on how crime has been perpetrated by powerful groups as well as organizations for example such as the transnational corporations are more often treated by the state as the civil as opposed to the criminal matters. In this case it reflects on the capacity of the powerful in shaping the laws in ways which would not criminalize their activities. From this it can be said that there are some favoritism when it comes to certain entities. Even though crimes are committed in those organizations, it is shaped as civil matter rather than criminals. There are some individuals who commit the crimes yet they are favored by the system. This makes the statement that victims of crimes are recognized in the society the same to be wrong. There are some individuals in these large corporations that are shielded by the state when they do run and the law is twisted in manner to favor them.

Conclusion

I take the stand to disagree with the statement that victims of crimes are afforded equal recognition in the society. This is not true, in the current society we live in. victim of crime are judged differently depending on the degree of the seriousness of the crime which is committed. Different crimes are viewed on different magnitude. A conman and a murderer are viewed different because of the kind of crime committed. Moreover, there are also situation where corporations are protected by the state and laws has being changed to suit their needs. in some instances the crime is treated as civil rather than criminal matters. Therefore, ‘All victims of crime are afforded equal recognition in society’ statement is untrue.

References

Adam, H., 2017. Divided Memories: Reckoning with a Criminal Regime. In Justice and the Politics of Memory (pp. 17-36). Routledge.

Lanier, M.M., Henry, S. and Desire'JM, A., 2014. Essential criminology. Hachette UK.

Reid, S.T., 2015. Crime and criminology. Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.

Weisburd, D., 2015. The law of crime concentration and the criminology of place. Criminology, 53(2), pp.133-157.

How to cite this essay: