Concepts And Theories Of Deepwater Horizon Essay

Question:

Discuss about the important concepts and theories such as the organisational structures, culture, engineering risk, risk management, systems engineering with the help of Deepwater Horizon oil spill and drilling case.

Answer:

Introduction

Operational failures occur in several organizations across all the industries. The operational failures have consequences of minor inconveniences to some of the major catastrophes. One of such catastrophe was the Gulf Oil Disaster. On April 20, 2010 an explosion tore in the Deepwater Horizon drilling. Once the drilling of Macondo well deep under the waters was completed the economic, human, and the environmental disaster began (Wolf & Mejri, 2013). The explosion led to the death of 11 crew members along with severely injuring others. The disaster had its scope over the week as the four million barrels of oil was gushed uncontrollably along with threatening the precious habitats and livelihoods of the people. The case of Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling offers number of lesions for the future operations managers that can be used for preventing such disasters. (National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon , 2011).

This report will focus on understanding the important concepts and theories such as the organisational structures, culture, engineering risk, risk management, systems engineering with the help of Deepwater Horizon oil spill and drilling case. The investigation report of the disaster indicated that this disaster was preventable if progressive guidelines and practices were followed.

Discussion

Systems engineering

System engineering is one of the effective approaches that help in realizing successful systems. It is a robust approach that is used for creating, designing and operating the system. System engineering can also be termed as the collaborative approach when number of disciplines is working together. The Macondo well project was one such project that involved number of disciplines (Aronson, 2017). This project involved a system thinking that can be referred to as a holistic approach in different parts of the system work together to achieve the overall objective of the project. There are seven major parts involved in the system engineering. These seven parts are discussed below:

Source: (Sebokwiki, 2017)

In order to ensure that a system works efficiently it is essential for all of its parts to work in coordination towards the actual goal. In this case of Macondo well project there was an absolute failure oaf system thinking model. This is because each of the parts of the system was working is a different direction.

The organization structure can be defined as the activities associated with the activities such as the coordination, task allocation and the supervision that are directed towards an organizational objective. Organizations now need to be flexible, innovative and efficient enough so as to operate effectively in a complex environment along with achieving a competitive advantage. There are number of theories associated with the organizational structures such as Neoclassical Organization Theory, classical organization theory and the system theory. One of the organization structure theories that can be applied in the case of BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling is the system theory. According to this theory of organization structure the parts of an organization are interrelated. The failure of oil spill and offshore drilling negatively affected all the parts of BP (Ingersoll et al., 2012). Further the case analysis indicated that the organization structure of BP was not effective as there was a lack of effective communication, leadership and the procedures. The Macondo disaster is the result of both the technical failure and the failure of the management. There were conflicts and confusion between the managers about who was accountable for the critical decision making (Goldenberg, 2010). Further there was not effective communication as the critical information was not communicated to the well sire engineers (Roberts, 2011).


Organizational culture encompasses the behaviour and values that contribute the overall psychological and social environment of the organization. Tanase (2015) also stated that organization culture is one of the important aspects that has an impact on the success or failure of an operation. Fleury (2009) has also defined organization culture as the pattern of basic shared assumption that by learnt by a group for the solving the problem. The culture of the organization is important in terms of teaching the new members the correct way of thinking, perceiving and acting in relation to the problems (Lehman, 2010).

There were major flaws in the organizational culture of BP that led to a huge operational failure or a disaster. The flaws in the organizational culture of BP can be demonstrated with the help of a fact that there was a lack of a culture of leadership responsibility. Being one of the biggest companies in the area of oil and gas the organization culture the focus of BP should be on creating an organizational culture in which individuals take ownership of the safety issues with a determination. Further, the disaster was preventable if BP had a functional safety culture. (Desson & Clouthier, 2004). BP had an organization culture with incentives on an increase in the productivity but there was no increase in the protection of the workers (Cholan & Makin, 2013). The lack of functional safety culture had a major impact on the balance between protection and production that further affects the barriers that can be used for preventing the failures. Therefore it can be said that BP needs to develop a safety culture by maintaining a balance between production and protection (Roberts, 2011).

Engineering risk can be defined as the effect of flaw or the deficiency in the engineering or the design of the project. The engineering risks are also known as the design risks. (Kremljak & Kafol, 2014). There were number of design or the engineering risks involved in the explosion of Macondo well. The engineering team was involved in making number of decisions related to the design of the well. The engineers at the site made the decisions that complicated the cementing resulting in the explosion disaster. For example engineers decided to install the rupture disks in the well; they decided to avoid the trapped annular spaces etc. The explosion of Macondo well was the result of multiple actions. There was complex and an interlinked series of judgements, human failures, and engineering design risks and the team interfaces. There were many engineering risks involved in the Macondo well project that resulted in the explosion of the well. The engineering decisions taken by the engineers of BP increased the overall risk of cementing failure (Larsen, 2017).

Proper risk management in the complex projects such as the Macondo well project requires a constant awareness of all he potential risks involved in the project. Risk management utilizes the strategies and approaches or the barriers that can address likelihood as well as the consequences of the failure (Kielland, 2011).

Deepwater drilling is one of the most challenging and risky task. The companies involved in the risk assessment in Macondo failed to analyze the risks along with developing the risk mitigation plan. This further resulted in a biased decision making in context of saving time and money along with increasing the risk of blowout.


There was an improper risk management in the Macondo well project as one of the simple approach decision tree was used for evaluating the cement. The decision tree encouraged a simple linear approach in which the complex risks such as the failure in the cementing was forgotten because of the incomplete indicators (Bea, 2011).

Further in the Macondo well project the uncertainties, hazards and the risks were not identified and managed (Houck 2010). The requirements to prevent the blowout were waived out. The consequences associated with the blowout were insignificant. The likelihood and consequences of the failures were underestimated. As a result, the emergency responses, preventive measures, cleanup process was significantly inadequate (Wellintegrity, 2011).

Project management principles

Project management can be defined as the practice associated with initiating, planning, executing as well as controlling the work so as to achieve a specific objective or goal. Project management is one of the composite activities with number of dimensions. The complexity of the project depends on the class and level of the project. In essence it can be said that project management is the discipline associated with the planning, organizing, managing, leading and controlling the organizational resources (Wideman, 2009).

A successful project follows some important project management principles that are listed below: Structure of the project, project definition, risk recognition, clear goals, transparency in status of the project, responsibility of the project manager, and success of the project (Little, 2011). Macondo well project was one of the most important and complex projects that did not fulfil many of the principles of project management. This led to the failure of the project and making it a huge disaster (Cholan & Makin, 2013).


Communication is one of the most important aspects of project management as it helps in creating transparency and clearing the goals and activities essential for the completion of the project. There was an inadequate communication that contributed to the blowout (Mustaro & Rossi, 2013). The decision makers and the engineers at the site did not communicate at the site leaders who were responsible for making the decisions (National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon , 2011).

There was a lack of clear, timely and detailed procedures to the site leaders and the crew involved in the project. The team of BP‘s onshore Macondo was however rushing to provide the procedures and design the operations on the rigs. As a result the employees on the rig wee not informed about the upcoming operations. There were number of problems associated with the risk management process used by the BP’s project managers and the engineers. An ineffective risk assessment process has led to wrong decision making that led to the project failure. There was no formal process of risk assessment that led of delayed decision making. The risk management process was inefficient, the decision were taken in isolation rather than considering the overall impact of the solutions on the project (Roberts, 2011).

The above discussion highlights the fact the Macondo project failure can be attributed to any one of the factors or the actions. There are number factors associated with the same and these factors have been identified in this essay. Starting from the organizational structure of BP, the structure of the organization was not effective enough to promote open communication among the managers and the workers. The structure of the organization was complex in nature that further created confusions and conflicts between the people involved in the project. All these factors have a significant negative impact on the organization culture of BP. The focus of such a big oil drilling company should have been on the maintaining a safety culture but the organization focused on offering the incentives and improving the productivity with increasing the safety measures and practices for the workers. A lack of safety culture in the organization further led to an inefficient risk management system. The risk assessment process of the organization focused on saving the cost and time with the help of simple evaluation techniques such decision tree.

Conclusion

The Macondo blowout was one of the disasters that led to the loss of people, financial losses along with severely affecting the environment. The essay above has focused on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling case with the help of concepts such as organisational structures, culture, engineering risk, risk management, systems engineering. There were number of technical and non-technical factors that were associated with the blowout. The easy has however focused on the non-technical factors associated with the Macondo blowout. There were some major flaws in the organization structure, organization culture and the risk management process of BP that led to such a devastating disaster. It is important for BP and other on drilling companies to develop a safety culture so that the overall safety of the workers and projects can be ensured. The major focus of the companies should be on increasing the safety rather than the productivity of the organization. This case has provided number of useful lessons for the future oil drilling projects. All the sub systems of an organization need to work together to successfully complete a project.

References

Aronson, D 2017, Overview of system thinking, viewed 23 May 2018,

Bea, RG 2011, Risk Assessment and Management, viewed 23 May 2018,

Cholan, J & Makin, T 2013, The Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill, viewed 23 May 2018,

Desson, K & Clouthier, J 2004, 'Organizational Culture – Why Does It Matter?', Symposium on International Safeguards International Atomic Energy Agency. Vienna, Austria, pp. 1–9, viewed 23 May 2018,

Fleury, MTL 2009, 'Organizational Culture and Renewal of Competences', Brazilian Administration Review, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1-14.

Goldenberg, S 2010, BP oil spill blamed on management and communication failures, viewed 23 May 2018,

Ingersoll, C, Locke, RM & Reavis, C 2012, BP and the Deepwater Horizon Disaster of 2010, viewed 23 May 2018,

Kielland, A 2011, Risk Assessment and Management: Challenges of the Macondo Well Blowout Disaster, viewed 23 May 2018,

Kremljak, Z & Kafol, C 2014, 'Types of risk in a system engineering environment and software tools for risk analysis', Procedia Engineering, vol. 69, pp.177-83.

Larsen, ER 2017, Adapting Project Management Principles and Tools for Research and Development, viewed 23 May 2018,

Lehman, DW 2010, 'Organizational Cultural Theory and Research Administration Knowledge Management', Journal of Research Administration, vol. 48, no. 2, pp.52-66.

Little, B 2011, 'The principles of successful project management: It takes careful planning, skilful leadership … and a little bit of luck', Human Resource Management International Digest, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 36-39.

Mustaro, P N & Rossi, R 2013, 'Project management principles applied in academic research projects', Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, vol. 10, pp.325-40.

National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon 2011, The Gulf Oil Disaster and the Future, viewed 23 May 2018,

Roberts, KH 2011, After the Dust Settles…, viewed 23 May 2018,

Sebokwiki 2017, Guide to the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBoK), viewed 23 May 2018,

Tanase, IA 2015, 'The importance of organizational culture based on culture transfer', 9th International Management Conference on Management and Innovation for Competitive Advantage, Bucharest, Romania, pp. 848–852, viewed 23 May 2018,

Wellintegrity 2011. BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling, viewed 23 May 2018,

Wideman, RM 2009. Fundamental Principles of Project Management. Reserach gate.

Wolf, D D & Mejri, M 2013, 'Crisis communication failures: The BP case study', International Journal of Advances in Management and Economics, vol. 2, no. 2, pp.48-56

How to cite this essay: