Part 1: Who i will be as a learner?
What is learning design?
According to Honey and Mumford’s learning design questionnaire (1992) learning sometimes appears as a continuing period where a person has a learning experience, product reviews the knowledge, concludes from that experience and plans the next thing. A person’s choices for one or maybe more associated with phases associated with the learning period result in talents and weaknesses of learning design.
In experiential learning concept, the model of style is based on a concept of learning. The idea describes four stages in the process of learning from experience: concrete experience; reflective observation; abstract conceptualization; and active experimentation. Individual learning styles are defined by a person’s reliance on these four learning modes. (Boyatzis and Kolb, 1995)
Gagne (1984) claims these strategies “enable learners to decide on at appropriate times the intellectual skills and declarative knowledge they'll bring to keep in learning, remembering, and problem solving”.
Introduction of VARK:
The VARK is short for artistic (V), Aural (A), Read/Write (R), and Kinesthetic (K). It is a tool for student to analyze their learning style. In line with the Fleming (2009) VARK is a questionnaire that provides users with a profile of these learning choices. It is about a learner’s preferences for taking in and offering information in a learning context. The objective of VARK would be to assist learner to give some thought to their learning style in numerous means. It indicates a few ideas for learner to understand which learning practices are suited to them and exactly how they could discover effectively.
But the limitation of VARK is the fact that questionnaire does not show anything about inspiration. It just contributes to improve learning. Learners only can transform their study techniques based on their VARK outcomes (Fleming, 2009).
My learning design outcome of VARK can be as follows:
According to my VARK result, i've got nine markings in Aural. Artistic, Read/ Write as well as Kinesthetic are in seven marks. It demonstrates i'm a multimodal learning style. I could learn from different learning styles plus it implies that I have strong in Aural area.
Aural student learns by paying attention whom loves to discover aural directions. In reality, my consequence of the VARK is closes match to my own learning style as I often utilize various learning practices under different situations. Including, i favor go to team conversations, lecture and guide. In school, i enjoy go to the lecture to lectern the instructor to description. Within the final 12 months project, i like discuss with my group people and explain new idea to other people. Additionally we follow my group frontrunner guidelines to get some helpful information from the web for our project.
Having said that, we additionally as a Visual style learner. Artistic learner prefers demonstrations inside their learning and certainly will learn through descriptions. In my working experience, I work with Wellcome supermarket, my supervisor demonstrated that how exactly to put items regarding shelves and said all services and products by which area. I am able to effortlessly have the meaning and memorize it due to leaving a powerful impression in my own mind.
Get help with your essay today, from our professional essay writers!
registered writers in the topic of philosophy are ready and waiting to help you with your studies.
- Get assistance with your essay
- View professionally written samples
For the kinesthetic student, i favor experiencing things rather than just read the notes through the learning process. As an example, i have to studies on my own when purchasing a new cell phone, in the place of reading the leaflet of this items.
Finally, VARK outcome can indicate my learning designs. Often i prefer training earnestly, often i favor paying attention just. That’s why i've multimodal choices. In reality, I have to spend more attention in different learning styles. VARK is extremely ideal for helping me personally to understand more about my learning choices.
Introduction OF MBTI:
The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) originated by Katherine Cook Briggs and Isabel Briggs Myer. It based on the theories of psychologist Carl Jung (Morgan and Barbour, 2008). Hutchinson (1997) shows how personality indicators for instance the MBTI can he used in a practical solution to comprehend variations in just how people behave and to help out with team building events and communication in a small business environment.
The MBTI scales measure a preference for four measurements: (Saggino, Cooper and Kline, 2001)
Which represents the orienting toward the outer world of individuals and things and/or internal realm of principles and ideas.
Which reflects the individual’s preference for factual realistic or international possibilities perception.
Which represents reaching judgments by impersonal and rational processes or by subjective processes.
The procedure of visiting a summary about one thing or becoming alert to something.
In combination, the MBTI is a sixteen-type personality profile instrument. (Goby and Lewis, 2000)
However, based on Coe (1992), he stated that “the MBTI has several restrictions. First, it does not show any indication about people’s values and motivations. 2nd, the MBTI does not measure pathology. Third, the MBTI does not determine exactly how well the most well-liked functions are performed.”
My MBTI result for my Personality:
According to my MBTI outcomes, the above result shows that my preferred design of MBTI is ESFJ and ESFP which are 72% and 66 percent respectively. It shows the absolute most dominant function is extrovert, sensing, in addition to feeling.
The ESFJ, the most important choices are Extraverted experiencing. This implies I focus on building harmony into the working environment. I enjoy build rapport with people and create an optimistic atmosphere. I care for people’s welfare. Also I like to keep everybody happy while having a great relationship with other people. We appreciate other people’s contributions, seek to produce the role that others perform, and invest a lot of work in building good relationships. We you will need to over come differences of opinion in order to find ways in which individuals can agree.
For the ESFP, the main choices are Extraverted Sensing. I bring items to fruition through getting things done, and having them done now. I am extremely action-oriented, coping with whatever tasks the present situation presents. We frequently spur others into action too. I utilize your experience and use tools or processes that We have knowledge. We attempt to have an instantaneous impact on things, injecting a feeling of urgency, and looking to achieve clear goals and visible outcomes.
Base regarding outcome, MBTI assists me personally to know the personality. We agree totally that i'm an extravert person. As I have worked as Wellcome Supermarket, i discovered that building the good atmosphere can increase the relationship within the business. I additionally like to build a good relationship with customers that i like work into a happiness environment. Additionally i will be a vice-president of my additional schools’ alumni association. I like to share my research path with other people.
Besides that we also concern on what team member’s feeling in the place of my feel and invest many work in building good relationships. Therefore I am a sense person. As a sensing person, once I have always been doing projects, I would like to concentrate on the facts that assist my performing procedure. Additionally, i love to ask my classmates that has experienced those circumstances previously to make a much better choice.
Those two character types (ESFJ and ESFP) are differing in Judging and Perception. This preference is all about the entire process of arriving at a conclusion about one thing or becoming alert to something. I also think the judging is my character. I love to make an idea and proceed with the guideline to operate within an occasion restriction. When I have always been doing last 12 months task, I hope myself and my team members follow our plan and to meet with the requirement.
Get help with your essay today, from our expert essay writers!
certified authors within the subject of philosophy are prepared and waiting that will help you along with your studies.
- Get assistance with your essay
- View professionally written samples
Introduction of BELBIN
The Belbin team-role stock is a well-known and established measure for identification of specific group functions (Senior and Swailes, 1998). Belbin’s particular focus on the establishment of roles within a group, where in fact the assumptions of duties and responsibilities depends on a measure of self-discovery combined with a notion of the needs associated with the team in general. Belbin identify 9 team roles about various needs of an organization including plant, resource investigator, co-coordinator, shaper, monitor evaluator, group worker, implementer, complete finisher and professional.
My BELBIN result for my Team Role:
According to my Belbin report, the most accepted functions that we suitable are group worker and experts where we scored about 80 and 100 respectively.
Professional means those that have the precise knowledge and skills to accomplish their tasks. This type of people is enthusiastic in providing unique knowledge and skills to complete the group objectives. They will only add on just a limited front side and dwell on specialized personal interest. They only start thinking about their very own particular area ahead out an answer, so that they cannot offer a wider perspective. Including, i'm interested in computer. I prefer to complete something about data analysis and search information from the web. In last year task, I use my knowledge to investigate the investigation data and present in conclusion on that component. Additionally we offer tech support team in presentation.
Team worker represents the individuals that co-operative, mild, perceptive and diplomatic. They choose to assist other people and usually listen, builds and avert the friction in the group. They've been indecisive in crunch circumstances. For instance, I usually pay attention to others’ guidelines in my own work. Additionally i have to cooperate with my peers to accomplish the works.
To summarize, I believe these tests are very dependable. According to the test results, i understand and comprehend myself more. I will be an extravert person who wants to talk with other people and learn from various learning styles. I could cooperate with others and concern their feeling. We provide my computer knowledge for people and provide some advice for them.
For that reason, these tests assist me personally identify myself and inform me just how to improve myself. It makes me personally think more and give consideration to which task is suitable and interesting in my experience. Basically desire to be a leader, i have to find out more different designs and enhance my weaknesses. It's going to be a good advantage to my future career.
- Boyatzis, R.& Kolb, D. (1995) ‘From learning designs to learning abilities: the professional skills profile’, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 10(5), pp. 3-17
- Boyle, G (1995) ‘Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI): Some Psychometric Limitations’, Humanities & personal Sciences documents, Bond University
- Briggs, K. and Myers, I. (2009) totally free Personality Test: MMDI web site, offered by: http://www.teamtechnology.co.uk/mmdi-re/mmdi-re.htm (Accessed nineteenth November 2009)
- Coe, C.K., (1992) The MBTI: prospective uses and misuses in personnel management, offered at: http://www.allbusiness.com/human-resources/343006-1.html (Accessed: nineteenth November 2009)
- Fleming, N. (2009), FAQ of VARK formal site, offered by: http://www.vark-learn.com/english/page.asp?p=faq (Accessed: nineteenth November 2009)
- Goby, V. & Lewis, J. (2000) “Using Experiential Learning Theory therefore the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in Teaching company Communication”, company Communication Quarterly, 63(3), pp. 39-48.
- Jackson, C. & Lawty-Jones, M. (1996) “Explaining the overlap between personality and learning styles”, Journal of Personality and Individual Differences, 20, pp. 293-300.
- Lessem, R. & Baruch, Y. (2000) “Testing the SMT and Belbin Inventory in Top Management Teams”, Leadership and Organization developing Journal, 21(1/2), pp.75-83
- Morgan, A. &Barbour, K. (2008) “An initial study in to the character types of undergraduate business pupils.” Procedures of this Academy of Educational Leadership, 13(1), pp.33-38
- Saggino, A. & Cooper, C. & Kline, P. (2001) “A confirmatory element analysis of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator”, Personality and Individual variations, 30(1), pp. 3-9.